TWA + Plans strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine fourth-grade students

Exceptional Children

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 69-89

  Mason, Linda H ^a,c   Snyder, Katie Hickey ^b   Sukhram, Diana P ^b   Kedem, Yore ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c 210 CEDAR   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748430232     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290607300104     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baker, S., Gertsen, R., & Scanlon, D. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process, and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 65-77.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol, 2, pp. 1-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macro rules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
4. Campbell, J. R., Hombro, C. M., & Mazzeo, J. (1999). Trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2, 31-36.
5. Chall, J. S., Bissex, G. L., Conard, S. S., & HarrisSharples, S. H. (1996). Qualitative assessment of text difficulty: A practical guide for teachers and writers. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
6. Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children's minds. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
7. Cohen, M. R., Del Giorno, B. J., Harlan, J. D., McCormack, A. J., & Staver, J. R. (1986). Science. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
8. Ellis, E. S., & Graves, A. W. (1990). Teaching rural students with learning disabilities: A paraphrasing strategy to increase comprehension of main ideas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 10, 2-10.
9. Garcia, J. R., Gelo, D. J., Greenow, L. L., Kracht, J. B., & White, D. G. (1997). Our United States. Needham, MA: Silver Burdett Ginn.
10. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A metaanalysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., & PageVoth, V. (1992). Improving the compositions of students with learning disabilities using a strategy involving product and process goal setting. Exceptional Children, 58, 322-334.
12. Graves, A. W., & Levin, J. R. (1989). Comparison of monitoring and mnemonic text-processing strategies in learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 232-236.
13. Greenwald, E. A., Persky, H. R., Campbell, J. R., & Mazzeo, J. (1999). NAEP 1998 writing report card for the nation and the states. Education Statistics Quarterly, 1, 23-28.
14. Gunning, T. G. (2003). Building literacy in the content areas. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Hansen, J., & Pearson, R D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821-829.
16. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
17. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 22, 251-262.
18. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35, 1-16.
19. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2004). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241.
20. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and motivation of young struggling writers: Effects of selfregulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 295-340.
21. Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple probe technique: A variation of the multiple probe baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189-196.
22. Kintsch, W. (1983). Memory for text. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 186-204). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2001). Qualitative reading inventory-3. New York: Longman.
24. Manzo, A. V. (1969). The request procedure. The Journal of Reading, 13, 123-126, 163.
25. Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283-296.
26. Mason, L. H., Snyder, K., Jones, D. P., & Kedem, Y. [Self-regulating expository reading comprehension and informative writing: Effects for five 5th-grade students]. Unpublished data.
27. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Comprehension, Part II: Text comprehension instruction. In Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: www.nichd.nih.gov/ publications/nrp/report.htm
28. Ogle, D. M. (1989). The know, want to know, learn strategy. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children's comprehension of text (pp. 205-223). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
29. Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, R B., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 215-224.
30. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Available: http:// www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/ MR1465.pdf
31. Reid, M., & Borkowski, J. (1987). Casual attributions of hyperactive children: Implications for teaching strategies and self-control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 296-307.
32. Sadoski, M., & Pavio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Saenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31-41.
34. Sexton, M., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1998). Selfregulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on essay writing and attributions. Exceptional Children, 64, 295-311.
35. Sinatra, G. M., Brown, K. J., & Reynolds, R. E. (2002). Implications of cognitive resource allocation for comprehension strategies instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 62-76). New York: The Guilford Press.
36. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A. metaanalysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
38. Trabasso, T., Secco, T.; & Van Den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Tracey, D. H., A; Morrow, L. M. (2002). Preparing young learners for successful reading comprehension. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 219-233). New York: The Guilford Press.