Critical variables for infusing community content into a clinical program: An empirical study

Journal of Community Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 91-105

  Ager, Richard ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical; Community practice; Curriculum design; Evaluation; Implementation research; Social work

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748354903     PISSN: 10705422     EISSN: 15433706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J125v13n03_06     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ager, R. (2001). Community practice Bibliography. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Alliance for Children and Families (2000, May 12). Conference on "Aligning education and practice: Challenges and opportunities in social work education for community-centered practice." Chopin Hall Center for Children, Chicago, IL.
3. Brown, B.S. (1995). Reducing impediments to technology transfer in drug abuse programming. Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer, (pp. 169-185). Rockville, MD: NIDA.
4. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) (2000). The change book: A blueprint for technology transfer. Kansas City: Addiction Technology Transfer Center National Office.
5. Chess, W. A. & Norlin, J.M. (1997). Human behavior and the social environment (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
6. Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
7. Domitrovich, C.E. & Greenberg, M.T. (2000). The study of implementation: Current findings from effective programs that prevent mental disorders in school-aged children. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11(2), 193-221.
8. Ewalt, P. Freeman, E.M. & Poole, D.L. (Eds.) (1998). Community building: Renewal, well-being, and shared responsibility. Washington, DC: NASW.
9. Goldstein, M.L. (1991). The utilization of student research and Gestalt organization theory in the development of alcoholism and substance abuse curriculum (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(2-A), 683.
10. Gutierrez, L. & Alvarez, A.R. (2000). Educating students for multicultural community practice. Journal of Community Practice, 7(1), 39-56.
11. Hepworth, D.H. Rooney. R.H. & Larsen, J.A. (2002). Direct social work practice (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
12. Herie, M. & Martin, G.W. (2002). Knowledge diffusion in social work: A new approach to bridging the gap. Social Work, 47(1), 85-95.
13. Johnson, A.K. (1998). The revitalization of community practice: Characteristics, competencies, and curricula for community-based services. Journal of Community Practice, 5(3), 37-62.
14. Johnson, A.K. (2000). The Community Practice Pilot Project: Integrating methods, Held, community assessment, and experiential learning. Journal of Community Practice, 8(4), 5-25.
15. Kavanagh, K.H. (1995). Collaboration and diversity in technology transfer. In T.E. Backer, S.L. David, & G. Soucy (Eds.) Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer, (pp. 42-64). Rockville, MD: NIDA.
16. Kemp, S.P. Whittaker, J.I. & Tracy, E.M. (1997). Person-environment practice: The social ecology of interpersonal helping. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
17. Kondrat, M.E. (1994). Culture and power in technology transfer: Perspectives from a critical sociology of knowledge. Social Development Issues, 16(3), 45-67.
18. Kreutziger, S. S. Ager, R. D. Harrell, E. & Wright, J. (1999). The Campus Affiliates Program: A case study in response to "The university's responsibilities in troubled times." American Behavior Scientist, 42, 827-839.
19. Mizrahi, T. (2001). The status of community organizing in the 21st century: Community practice context, complexities, contradictions and contributions. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(2), 176-189.
20. Nichols, C.A. Casebolt, A. Figueira-McDonough, J. & Netting, F.E. (2000). Change strategies for integrating women's knowledge into social work curricula. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 65-78.
21. Nichter, M. Thompson, P.J. Shiffman, S. & Moscicki, A. (2002). Using qualitative research to inform survey development on nicotine dependence among adolescents. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 68(SuppI. 1), 41-56.
22. Pressman, J. & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Prochaska, J.O. DiClemente, C.C. & Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), pp. 1102-1114.
24. Reisch, M. & Lowe, J.I. (2000). "Of means and ends" revisited: Teaching ethical community organizing in an unethical society. Journal of Community Practice, 7(1), 19-38.
25. Rogers, E. M. (1995a). Diffusion of drug abuse prevention programs: Spontaneous diffusion, agenda setting, and reinvention. In T.E. Backer, S.L. David, & G. Soucy (Eds.). Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (pp. 90-105). Rockville, MD: NIDA.
26. Rogers, E.M. (1995b). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
27. Roman, P.M. & Johnson, J.A. (2002). Adoption and implementation of new technologies in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 211-218.
28. Soine, L. (1989). The environmental contaminants education project (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 26(4), 1439 (UMI No. 9009785).
29. Tenkasi, R.V. & Mohrman, S.A. (1995). Technology transfer as collaborative learning. In T.E. Backer, S.L. David, & G. Soucy (Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (pp. 147-168). Rockville, MD: NIDA.
30. Valente, T. & Davis, R. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy, 566, 55-67.
31. Wint, E. & Sewpaul, V. (2000). Product and process dialectic: Developing an indigenous approach to community development training. Journal of Community Practice, 7(1), 57-70.