The community practice pilot project: Integrating methods, field, community assessment, and experiential learning

Journal of Community Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 5-25

  Johnson, Alice K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Community assessment; Community practice; Community based practice; Experiential learning; Field education; Teaching methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937326760     PISSN: 10705422     EISSN: 15433706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J125v08n04_02     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen, C., Brown, C., and Byrd, P., 1997. The availability of mental health services:A community assessment, Cleveland, OH:Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University. Unpublished paper
2. Alliance for Children and Families. Conference on “Aligning education and practice:Challenges and opportunities in social work education for community-centered practice.”. May 12. Chicago, IL.:Chapin Hall Center for Children.
3. Annie Casey E. Foundation. 1999. Rebuilding communities initiative [Available at http://www.aecf.org/initiatives/rci/rci.htm]
4. Chow, J., and Coulton, C., 1996. Strategic use of a community database for planning and practice. Computers in Human Services, 13(3):57–72.
5. Cohen, M., Coyne, M., Croke, A., and Lester, C., 1997. A community assessment of the Fairfax Recreation Center, Cleveland, OH:Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University. Unpublished paper
6. Coulton, C., 1996. Poverty, work, and community:A research agenda for an era of diminishing federal responsibility. Social Work, 41(5):509–519.
7. Coulton, C., Pasqualone, C., Bania, N., Martin, T., Lalich, N., Fernando, M., and Li, F., 2000. “How are they managing? A six month retrospective of Cuyahoga County families leaving welfare”. In Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change, Cleveland, OH:Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University. http://povertycenter.cwru.edu/Q4_1_report1.pdf
8. Edna McConnell Clark Foundation. 1998. Programs http://fdncenter.org/grantmaker/emclar/programs.html
9. Ewalt, P., Freeman, E., and Poole, D., 1998. Community building:Renewal well-being and shared responsibility, Washington, DC:NASW Press.
10. Ford Foundation. 1998. Community Building focuses on restoring social fabric [http://www.rockfound.org/reports/community/extract.html]
11. Hardcastle, D., Wenocur, S., and Powers, P., 1997. Community practice Theories and skills for social workers, New York:Oxford University Press.
12. Ife, J., 1995. Community development:Creating community alternatives-vision analysis and practice, Melbourne, Australia:Addison Wesley Longman.
13. Jarman-Rohde, L., McFall, J., Kolar, P., and Strom, G., 1997. The changing context of social work practice:Implications and recommendations for educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(1):29–46.
14. Johnson, A., 1998a. Community practice interviews with MSASS Faculty, Cleveland, OH:Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University. Unpublished report
15. Johnson, A., 1998b. The revitalization of community practice:Characteristics, competencies and curricula for community-based services. Journal of Community Practice, 5(3):37–62.
16. Kirst-Ashman, K., and Hull, G., Jr. 1997. Generalist practice with organizations and communities, Chicago:Nelson-Hall Publishers.
17. Kretzmann, J., and McKnight, J., 1993. Building communities from the inside out:A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets, Evanston, IL:Northwestern University.
18. Kubish, A., Weiss, C., Schorr, L., and Connell, J., 1995. “Introduction”. In New approaches to evaluating community initiatives:Concepts methods and contexts, Edited by:Connell, J. P., Kubish, A. C., Schorr, L. B., and Weiss, C. H., Washington, DC:Aspen Institute.
19. Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences. April 19 1999. Principles of community based practice. Statement approved by the faculty at the Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, April 19, Cleveland, OH:editor.
20. Miller, D., and DiGuisseppe, D., 1998. Fighting social problems with information:The development of a community database-the Violence Information Network. Computers in Human Services, 15(1):21–34.
21. Milligan, S., Nario-Redmond, M., and Coulton, C., 1997. The 1995–1996 Cleveland Community Building Initiative Baseline Progress Report, Cleveland, OH:Case Western Reserve University, Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change.
22. Naparstek, A., and Dooley, D., 1997. Countering urban disinvestment through community-building initiatives. Social Work, 42(5):506–514.
23. National Community Building Network. 2000. [http://ncbn.org/docs/Events/E_LAConf/index.htm]
24. National Roundtable on Innovative Community-Based Partnerships. 2000. [http://www.americanhumane.org/upcomev.html#rtcp]
25. Rothman, J., ed. 1999. Reflections on community organization Enduring themes and critical issues, Itasca, IL:F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
26. Saleeby, D., ed. 1992. The strengths perspective, New York:Longman.
27. Schorr, L., 1997. Common purpose:Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America, New York:Anchor Books.
28. Sherraden, M., 1993. Community studies in the baccalaureate social work curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 7(1):75–88.
29. Sherraden, M., and Page-Adams, D., 1997. Asset building as a community revitaliza-tion strategy. Social Work, 42(5):423–434.
30. Kellogg W. K. Foundation. 1998. Family and neighborhood models summary report. [http://www.skkf.org/empire/?SubsystemID=e&ComponentID=660]
31. Wood, Z., Johnson, A., and Shepard, T., May 1998. The Community Practice Pilot Project:The integration of community-based family development practice & asset-based community building in foundation curriculum, May, Cleveland, OH:Man-del School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University. Unpublished report