Sperm precedence in experimental interspecific multiple matings of hybridizing north american tiger swallowtail butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)

Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 65-78

  Stump, Aram D ^a,b   Scriber, J Mark ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Conspecific sperm; Hybrid zone spermatophore; P. canadensis; Papilio glaucus; Polyandry

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; POLYANDRY; SPERMATOPHORE;

LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIO CANADENSIS; PAPILIO GLAUCUS; PAPILIONIDAE;

EID: 33748324459     PISSN: 00240966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (165)

1. Albuquerque, G. S., C. A. Tauber & M. J. Tauber. 1996. Post-mating reproductive isolation between Chrysopa quadripunctata and Chrysopa slonnae: mechanisms and geographic variation. Evolution 50:1598-1606.
2. Allen, G.R., D. J. Kazmer & R. F. Luck. 1994. Post-copulatory male behavior, sperm precedence and multiple mating in a solitary parasitoid wasp. Anim. Behav. 48: 635-644.
3. Andolfatto, P., J.M. Scriber & B. Charlesworth. 2003. No association between mitochondrial DNA haplotypes and a female-limited mimicry phenotype in Papilio glaucus. Evolution 57: 305-316.
4. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford Univ. NY.
5. Bella, J. L., R. K, Butlin, C. Ferris & G. M. Hewitt. 1992. Asymmetrical homogeny and unequal sex ratio from reciprocal mating-order crosses between Chorthippus parallelus subspecies. Heredity 68:345-352.
6. Bergstrom, J. & C. Wiklund. 2002. Effects of size and nuptial gifts on butterfly reproduction: can females compensate for a smaller size through male-derived nutrients? Behav. Ecol. & Sociobiol. 52: 296-302.
7. Bernasconi, G. & L. Keller. 2001. Female polyandry affects their sons' reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. J. Evol. Biol. 14:186-193.
8. Bertram, M. J., D. M. Neubam, & M. F. Wolfner. 1996. Localization of the Drosophila male accessory gland protein ACP36DE in mated female suggests a role in sperm storage. Insect Biochem. Mol. Bio. 261:971-980.
9. Birkhead, T. R. 1998. Cryptic female choice: criteria for establishing female sperm choice. Evolution 52:1212-1218.
10. Birkhead, T. R. 2000. Defining and demonstrating postcopulatory female choice again. Evolution 54:1057-1060.
11. Birkhead, T. R. & G. A. Parker. 1997. Sperm competition and mating systems, pp. 121-145. In Krebs, J. R., N. B. Davies (eds.) Behavioral Ecology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific.
12. Birkhead, T. R., A. P. Moller & W. J. S. Sutherland. 1993. Why do females make it so difficult for males to fertilize their eggs? J. Theoretical Biol. 161:51-60.
13. Birkhead, T. R., A. P. Moller & W. J. S. Sutherland. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. San Diego: Academic Press.
14. Bissoondath, C. J. & C. Wiklund. 1997. Effect of male body size on sperm precedence in the polyandrous butterfly, Pieris napi L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Behav. Ecol. 8:518-523.
15. Boggs, C. L. 1997a. Reproductive allocation from reserves and income in butterfly species with differing adult diets. Ecology 78: 181-191.
16. Boggs, C. L.. 1997b. Dynamics of reproductive allocation from juvenile and adult feeding: radiotracer studies. Ecology 78: 192-202.
17. Chapman, T., L. F. Liddle, J. M. Kalb, M. F. Wolfner, & L. Partridge. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241-244.
18. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham & L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:41-47
19. Clark, A. G., M. Aguadé, T. Prout, L. G. Harshman & C. H. Langley. 1995. Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139:189-201.
20. Clark, A. G., D. J. Begun & T. Prout. 1999. Female X male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283:212-220.
21. Clark, C. A. & P. M. Sheppard. 1962. Offspring from double matings in the swallowtail butterflies. Entomologist. August:199-202.
22. Cobbs, G. 1977. Multiple insemination and male sexual selection in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Amer. Natur. 111:641-656.
23. Cook, P. A. & N. Wedell. 1996. Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B 263:1047-1051.
24. Cook, P. A. & N. Wedell. 1999. Non-fertile sperm delay female remating. Nature 397:486.
25. Cook, P. A., I. F. Harvey & G. A. Parker. 1997. Predicting variation in sperm precedence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal. Society of London, Series B. 352:771-780.
26. Cordero, C. 1999. Is spermatophore number a good measure of mating frequency in female Callophrys xami (Lycaenidae)? J. Lepid. Soc. 53:169-170.
27. Coyne J. A. & H.A. Orr (2004) Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 545 pp.
28. Dasmahapatra, K.K., M.J. Blum, A. Aiello, S. Hackwell, N. Davies, E.P. Bermingham, & J. Mallet. 2002. Inferences from a rapidly moving hybrid zone. Evolution 56: 741-753.
29. Davies, N., A. Aiello, J. Mallet, A. Pomiankoswki & R. E. Silberglied. 1997. Speciation in two neotropical butterflies: extending Haldane's rule. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 264: 845-851.
30. Deering, M. D. 1998. Preferential. mate selection by males as a reproductive isolating mechanism between the swallowtail species. Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
31. Deering, M. D. & J. M. Scriber. 1998. Heterospecific mating behavior of Papilio palamedes in Florida (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Holare. Lepid. 5:49-51.
32. Deering, M. D. & J. M. Scriber. 2002. Field bioassays show heterospecific mating preference asymmetry between hybridizing North American Papilio butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J. Ethology 20:25-33.
33. Dickinson, J. L. 1986. Prolonged mating in the milkweed leaf beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the "sperm loading" hypothesis. Behavioral Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 331-338.
34. Donovan, J. 2001. Are hybrids more fit than their parental types? A test using two swallowtail butterfly species, Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) MS Thesis. Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI. 79pp.
35. Donovan, J. & J. M. Scriber. 2003. Detection and verification of a natural. primary hybridization event between two Tiger Swallowtail Butterfly species in northern Michigan. J. Lepid. Soc. 57:25-35.
36. Drummond, B. A. 1984. Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera, pp. 290-370. In Smith, R. L. (ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York.
37. Eady, P E., N. Wilson & M. Jackson. 2000. Copulating with multiple males enhances female fecundity but not egg-to-adult survival in the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 54:2161-2165.
38. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New York, pp 501.
39. Eberhard, W. G. 2000. Criteria for demonstrating post-copulatory female choice. Evolution 54:1047-1050.
40. Endler, J. 1998. The place of hybridization in evolution. Evolution 52: 640-644.
41. Evans, J. P., L. Zane, S. Francescato, & A. Pilastro. 2003. Directional postcopulatory sexual. selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421:360-363.
42. Flint, H. M. & E. L. Kressin. 1968. Gamma irradiation of the tobacco budworm: sterilization, competitiveness, and observations on reproductive biology. J. Econ. Ent. 61:478-483.
43. Gack, C. & K. Peschek. 1994. Spermathecal morphology, sperm transfer and a novel mechanism of sperm displacement in the rove beetle, Aleochara curtula (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Zoomorphology. 114:227-237.
44. Gage, A. R. & C. J. Barnard. 1996. Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size. Behav. Biol. Sociobio. 38:349-353.
45. Gage, M. J. G. 1998. Influences of sex, size, and symmetry on ejaculate expenditure in a moth. Behav. Ecol. 9:592-597.
46. Gage, M. J. G. & R. R. Baker. 1991. Ejaculate size varies with sociosexual situation in an insect. Ecol. Ent. 16:331-337.
47. Gilcrist, A. S. & L. Partridge. 2000. Why is it different to model sperm displacement in Drosophila melanogaster: the relation between sperm transfer and copulation duration. Evolution. 54:534-542.
48. Gregory, P. G. & D. J. Howard. 1994. A post-insemination barrier to fertilization isolates two closely related ground crickets. Evolution. 48:705-710.
49. Guppy, C. S. & J. H. Shepard. 2001. Butterflies of British Columbia. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.
50. Hagen, R. H. & J. M. Scriber. 1991. Systematics of the Papilio glaucus and P. troilus groups (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): inferences from allozymes. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 94:380-395.
51. Hagen, R. H. & J. M. Scriber. 1995. Sex chromosomes and speciation in the Papilio glaucus group, pp.211-228. In Scriber, J.M., Y. Tsubaki, R. C. Lederhouse (eds.), Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientific Publishers, Gainseville, Florida.
52. Harshman, L. G. & T. Prout. 1994. Sperm displacement without sperm transfer in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 48:758-766.
53. Hellriegel, B. & G. Bernasconi. 2000. Female-mediated differential sperm storage in a fly with complex spermathecae, Scatophaga stercoraria. Animal Behav. 58:311-317.
54. Hereau, H. & J. M. Scriber. 2003. Interspecific copulation of a dark morph Papilio glaucus female and a male P. polyxenes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 57:71-74
55. Hewitt, G. M., P. Mason, & R. A. Nichols. 1989. Sperm precedence and homogamy across a hybrid zone in the alpine grasshopper Podisma pedestris. Heredity 62:343-353.
56. Howard, D. J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:109-132.
57. Howard, D. J., F G. Gregory, J. Chu & M. L. Cain. 1998. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52:511-516.
58. Howard, D. J., J. L. Marshall.L, D. D. Hampton, S. C. Britch, M. L. Draney, J. Chu & R. G. Cantrell. 2002. The genetics of reproductive isolation: a retrospective and prospective look with comments on ground crickets. Amer. Natur. 159: S8-S21.
59. Jennions, M. D. & M. Petrie. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 75:21-64.
60. Karlsson, B. 1998. Nuptial gifts, resource allocation and reproductive output in a polyandrous butterfly, Pleris napi. Ecology 79: 2931-2940.
61. Katakura, H. 1986a. Evidence for the incapacitation of heterospecific sperm in the female genital tract in a pair of closely related ladybirds (Insecta, Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Zool. Sci. 3:115-121.
62. Katakura, H. 1986b. A further study of the effect of interspecific mating on the fitness of a pair of sympatric phytophagous ladybirds. Kontyû, Tokyo 54:235-242.
63. Katakura, H. & Y. Sobu. 1986. Cause of low hatchability by the interspecific mating in a pair of sympatric ladybirds (Insecta, Coleoptera, Coccinellidae): incapacitation of sperm and death of hybrid embryos. Zool. Sci. 13:315-322.
64. Karlsson, B. 1995. Resource allocation and mating systems in butterflies. Evolution. 49:955-961.
65. Kempenaers, B., K. Foersters, S. Questian, B. C. Robertson & E. L. M. Vermeirssen. 2000. Distinguishing between female choice versus male sperm competition: a comment on Birkhead. Evolution 54:1050-1052.
66. Lamunyon, C.W 1994. Paternity in naturally occurring Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) as estimated using enzyme polymorphism. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34:403-408.
67. LaMunyon, C. W. 1999. Sperm storage by females of the polyandrous noctuid moth, Heliothis virescens. Animal. Behav. 59:395-402.
68. LaMunyon, C. W. & S. Ward. 1999. Evolution of sperm size in nematodes: sperm competition favors larger sperm. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Series B. 266:263-267.
69. Layberry, R. A., P. W. Hall & J. D. Lafontane 1998. The Butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press.
70. Lederhouse, R. C. 1995. Comparative mating behavior and sexual selection in North American Swallowtail butterflies, pp.117-131. In Scriber, J. M., Y. Tsubaki, & R. C. Lederhouse (eds.), Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida.
71. Lederhouse, R. C. & J. M. Scriber. 1987. Ecological significance of a post-mating decline in egg viability in the tiger swallowtail. J. Lepid. Soc. 41: 83-93.
72. Lederhouse, R. C., M. Ayres & J. M. Scriber. 1989. Evaluation of spermatophore counts in studying mating systems of Lepidoptera. J. Lepid. Soc. 43:93-101.
73. Lederhouse, R. C., M. Ayres & J. M. Scriber. 1990. Adult nutrition affects male virility in Papilio glaucus. Funct. Ecol. 4:743-751.
74. Lefevre, G. & U. B. Jonsson. 1962. Sperm transfer, storage, displacement, and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 66:195-202.
75. Luebke, H. J., J. M. Scriber & B. S. Yandell. 1988. Use of multivariate discriminate analysis of male wing morphometrics to delineate the Wisconsin hybrid zone for Papilio glaucus glaucus and P. g. canadensis. Amer. Mid. Nat. 119:366-379.
76. Mann, T. 1984. Spermatophores. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
77. Marshall, J. L., M. L. Arnold & D. J. Howard. 2002. Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol. & Evol. 17:558-563
78. Martin, O. Y. & D. J. Hosken. 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423:979-982.
79. Neubaum, D. M. & M. F. Wolfner. 1999. Wise, winsome, or weird? Mechanisms of sperm storage in female animals. Curr. Topics. Develop. Biol. 41:67-97.
80. Newcomer, S. D., J. A. Zeh & D. W. Zeh. 1999. Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 96:10236-102241.
81. Ono, T.M., T. Siva-Jothy & A. Kato. 1989. Removal and subsequent ingestion of rival's semen during copulation in a tree cricket. Physiol. Entomol. 14: 195-202.
82. Ording, G. 2001. Island Populations and trait comparisons of tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio canadensis in the Great Lakes Region. M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
83. Orr, B. 1995. The evolution of the sphragis in the Papilionidae and other butterflies, pp. 155-164. In Swallowtail butterflies: the ecology and evolutionary biology. Scriber, J. M., Y. Tsubaki, R. C. Lederhouse (eds.), Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida.
84. Orr, B. & M. Turelli. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution. 55:1085-1094.
85. Otronen, M. 1997. Sperm numbers, their storage and usage in the fly, Dryomyza anilis. Proc.Royal Soc. London Series B. 264:777-782.
86. Pai, A. & G. Yan. 2002. Polyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles. Proc.Royal Soc.London. Series B, Biol. Sci. 269:361-368.
87. Pair, S. D., M. L. Laster & D. F. Martin. 1977. Hybrid sterility of the tobacco budworm: effects of alternate sterile and normal matings on fecundity and fertility. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 60: 952-954.
88. Parker, G. A. & L. W. Simmons. 2000. Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: ejaculatory duct dimensions and size-dependent sperm displacement. Evolution 54:924-935.
89. Parmesan, C., N. Ryrholm, C. Stefanescu, J. K. Hill, C. D. Thomas, H. Descimon, B. Huntley, L. Kaila, J. Kullberg, T. Tammaru, W. J. Tennett, J. A. Thomas & M. Warren. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographic ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 382:765-766.
90. Pavulaan, H. & D. M. Wright 2002. Pterourus appalachiensis (Papilionidae: Papilioninae), a new swallowtail butterfly from the Appalachian region of the United States. Taxonomic Report 3: 1-20.
91. Pitnick, T. & R. Snook. 2003. Sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57:1223-1236.
92. Pitnick, S. & W. D. Brown. 2000. Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice. Evolution 54: 1052-1056.
93. Pitnick, S., T. Markow, & G. S. Spicer. 1999. Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53:1804-1822.
94. Pivnick, K.A. & J. N. McNeil. 1987. Puddling in butterflies: Sodium affects reproductive success in Thyraelicus lineola. Physiol. Entomol. 12: 461-472.
95. Presgraves, D. C. 2002, Patterns of postzygotic isolaation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56: 1168-1183.
96. Price, C. S. 1997. Conspecific, sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388:663-666.
97. Price, C. S., K. A. Dyer & J. A. Coyne. 1999. Sperm competition between Drosophila males involves both displacement and incapacitation. Nature 400:449-452.
98. Price, C. S., C. H. Kim, C. J. Gronlund & J. A. Coyne. 2001. Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex. Evolution 55:81-922.
99. Price, C. S., C. H. Kim, J. Posluzny & J. A. Coyne. 2000, Mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54:2028-2037.
100. Qvarnström, A. 2001. Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol. & Evol. 16:5-7.
101. Raffa, K.F., N.Y. Havill & E.V. Nordheim. 2002. How many choices can your test animal compare effectively? Evaluating a critical assumption of behavioral preference tests. Oecologia 133: 422-429.
102. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
103. Rieseberg L. 2001 Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 351-358.
104. Robinson, T., N. A. Johnson & M. J. Wade. 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation: intraspecific and interspecific sperm precedence in Tribolium spp., flour beetles. Heredity 73:155-159.
105. Sadek, M. M. 2001. Polyandry in field-collected Spodoptera littoralis moths and laboratory assessment of the effects of male mating history. Ent. Exper. Appl. 98:165-172.
106. Sakaluk, S. K. & A. K. Eggert. 1996. Female control of sperm transfer and intraspecific variation in sperm precedence: antecedents to the evolution of a courtship food gift. Evolution 50:694-703.
107. Sakaluk, S. K., J. M. Schaus, A-K. Eggert, W. A. Snedden & P. L. Brady. 2002. Polyandry and fitness of offspring reared under varying nutritional stress in decorated crickets. Evolution 56:1999-2007.
108. Schwarz, D., B.J. Matta, N.L. Shakir-Botteri, and B.A. McPheron. 2005. Host shift to an invasive plant triggers rapid animal hybrid speciation. Nature 436: 546-549.
109. Scriber, J. M. 1982. Foodplants and speciation in the Papilio glaucus group, pp. 307-314. In Visser, J. H. & A. K. Minks (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International. Symposium on Insect Plant Relationships. PUDOC, Wageningen, Netherlands.
110. Scriber, J. M. 1990. Interaction of introgression from Papilio glaucus canadensis and diapause in producing 'spring form' Eastern tiger swallowtail butterflies, P. glaucus. Great Lakes Entomol. 23:127-138.
111. Scriber, J. M. 1993. Absence of behavioral induction in oviposition preference of Pailio glaucus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Great Lakes Entom, 26: 81-95.
112. Scriber, J. M. 1994. Climatic legacies and sex chromosomes: latitudinal patterns of voltinism, diapause size and host-plant selection in 2 species of swallowtail butterflies at their hybrid zone. pp. 133-171. In H.V. Danks (ed.) Insect life-cycle polymorphism: theory, evolution and ecological consequences for seasonality and diapause control. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
113. Scriber, J. M. 1996. Tiger tales: natural. history of native North American swallowtails. Amer. Ent. 42:19-32.
114. Scriber, J. M. 2002a. The evolution of insect-plant relationships; Chemical. constraints, coadaptation and concordance of insect/plant traits. Entomologia Expt. & Appl. 104:217-235.
115. Scriber, J. M. 2002b. Latitudinal and local geographic mosaics in host plant preferences as shaped by thermal units and voltinism in Papilio spp. (Lepidoptera). European J. Entomol. 99: 225-239.
116. Scriber, J. M. & S. Gage. 1995. Pollution and global climate change: plant ecotones, butterfly hybrid zones, and biodiversity, pp 319-344. In Scriber, J.M., Y. Tsubaki, R. C. Lederhouse, (eds.), Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientific Publishers, Inc., Gainesville, Florida.
117. Scriber, J. M., M. D. Deering, L. Francke, W. Wehling & R. C. Lederhouse. 1998a. Notes on the butterfly population dynamics of 3 Papilio species in south central. Florida (Highlands County). Holarctic Lepid. 5:53-62.
118. Scriber, J. M., M. D. Deering & A. Stump. 1998b. Evidence of long range transport of a swallowtail butterfly (Papilio glaucus L.) on a storm front into northern Michigan. Great Lakes Entomol. 31:151-160.
119. Scriber, J. M., R. Dowell,, R. C. Lederhouse & R. H. Hagen. 1990. Female color and sex ratio in hybrids between Papilio glaucus glaucus and P. eurymedon, P. rutulus and P. multicaudatus (Papilionidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 44:229-244.
120. Scriber, J. M., R. C. Lederhouse, & R. Dowell. 1995. Hybridization studies with North American swallowtails, pp. 269-282. In Scriber, J. M., Y. Tsubaki, R. C. Lederhouse (eds.), Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientific Publishers Inc., Gainesville, Florida.
121. Scriber, J. M. and Ording, G. 2005. Ecological speciation without host plant specialization: origins of a new cryptic Papilio species (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)(SIP-12) Ent. Exper. Appl. 115:247-263
122. Scriber, J. M., A. Stump, & M. Deering. 2003. Hybrid zone ecology and tiger swallowtail trait clines in North America, pp 367-391. In Boggs, C., W. Watt, P. Ehrilich (eds.), Ecology and evolution taking flight: butterflies as model study systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
123. Scriber, J. M., H. Romack & M. D. Deering. 2006. Not all bilateral gynandromorphs in the Papilio glaucus group of tiger swallowtails are interspecific hybrids: new specimens from field populations. Holarctic Lepid. in press.
124. Shapiro, L. H. 2000. Reproductive costs to heterospecific mating between two hybridizing katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 93:440-446.
125. Silberglied, R. E., J. G. Sheperd & J. L. Dickinson. 1984. Eunichs: the role of apyrene sperm in Lepidoptera. Amer. Nat. 123:255-265.
126. Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, New Jersey. 448 pp.
127. Simmons, L. W. & R. Achmann. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of sperm-use patterns in the bush cricket, Requena verticalis. Evolution. 54:942-952.
128. Simmons, L. W. & M. Siva-Jothy. 1998. Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection, pp.341-434. In Birkhead, T. R., A. P. Møller (eds.), Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London.
129. Simmons, L. W., G. A. Parker & P. Stockley. 1999. Sperm displacement in the yellow dung fly, Scataphaga stercoraria: an investigation of male and female processes. Amer, Nat. 153:302-314.
130. Siva-Jothy, M. T. & R. E. Hooper. 1996. Differential. use of stored sperm during oviposition in the damselfly, Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39:389-393.
131. Smedly, S.R. & T. Eisner. 1996. Sodium: a male moth's gift to its offspring. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 93: 809-813.
132. Smith, R. L. 19S4. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, San Diego, California, 687pp.
133. Sperling, F. A. H. 1990. Natural hybrids of Papilio (Insecta: Lepidoptera): poor taxonomy or interesting evolutionary problem? Can. J. Zool. 68:1790-1799.
134. Sperling, F. A. H. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA variation and Haldane's rule in the Papilio glaucus and P. troilus species groups. Heredity 71: 227-233.
135. Sperling, F. A. H. 2003. Butterfly molecular systematics: from species definitions to higher level phylogenies. Pp 431-458 In: Boggs, CL, Watt WB, & Ehrlich PR (eds) Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution taking flight. Univ. Chicago Press.
136. Stjernholm, F. & B. Karlsson. 2000. Nuptial gifts and the use of body reserves for reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly, Pieris napi. Proc. Roy. Soc. London. B 267: 807-811.
137. Stockley, P. 1997. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol. & Evol. 12:154-159.
138. Stump, A. D. 2000. Lack of cryptic reproductive isolation between Papilio canadensis and Papilio glaucus and population genetics near their hybrid zone. M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
139. Sugawara, T. 1979. Stretch reception in the bursa copulatrix of the butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora, and its role in behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. A 130:191-199.
140. Thornhill, R. & J. Alcock. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 547.
141. Tregenza, T. 2003. The battle between the sexes. Nature. 423:929-930.
142. Tregenza, T. & N. Wedell. 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature. 415:71-73.
143. Tregenza, T. N. Wedell, D. J. Hosken & P. I. Ward. 2003. Maternal eeffects on offspring depend on female mating pattern and offspring environment in yellow dung flies. Evolution 57: 297-304.
144. Tschudi-Rein, K. & G. Benz. 1990. Mechanisms of sperm transfer in female Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 83:1158-1164.
145. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton & J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and Speciation. Trends Ecol. & Evol. 16: 330-343.
146. Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial. feeding in insects: review of empirical studies. Biological. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 73: 43-78.
147. Via, S. 2002. The ecological genetics of speciation. American Naturalist 109: S1-S7
148. Waage, J. K. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916-918.
149. Wade, J. M., H. Patterson, N. Chang & N. A. Johnson. 1993. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation in flour beetles. Heredity 71:163-167.
150. Ward, P. I. 1993. Females influence sperm storage and use in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:313-319.
151. Ward, P. I. 1998. A possible explanation for cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly, Scatophaga stercoraria (L.). Ethology 104, 97-110.
152. Ward, P. I. 2000. Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly, Scatophaga stercoraria (L.). Evolution 54:1680-1686.
153. Watanabe, M. 1988. Multiple matings increase the fecundity of the yellow swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L., in summer generations. J. Insect Behav. 1:17-29.
154. Watanabe, M. & M. Hirota. 1999. Effects of sucrose intake on spermatophore mass produced by male swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus L. Zool. Sci. 3:509-516.
155. Watanabe, M. & K. Sato. 1993. A spermatophore structured in the bursa copulatrix of the small white Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) during copulation and its sugar content. J. Res. Lepid. 32:26-36.
156. Watanabe, M., M. Bon'no & A. Hachisuka. 2000. Eupyrene sperm migrates to spermatheca after apyrene sperm in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J. Ethology 18:91-99.
157. Wedell, N. & P. Cook. 1998. Determinants of paternity in a butterfly. Proc. Royal. Soc. London, Series B. 265:625-630.
158. Wedell, N, M., J. G. Gage & G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudencce and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:313-320.
159. Wiklund, C. 2003. Sexual selection and the evolution of butterfly mating systems, pp 67-90. In Boggs, C., W. Watt, & P. Ehrlich (eds.), Ecology and evolution taking flight: butterflies as model study systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
160. Wiklund, C., A. Kaitala, V. Lindfors & J. Albenius. 1993. Polyandry and its efffect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Behav. Ecol. & Sociobiol. 33: 25-33.
161. Wilson, N., S. C. Tubman, P. E. Eady & G. W. Roberstson. 1997. Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. Proc. Royal. Soc. London, Series B. 264:1491-1495.
162. Woods, H. A., C. E. Sorensen, A. Stephenson & J. F. Harrison. 2001. A simple allozyme method for distinguishing all life stages of Manduca sexta and M. quinquemaculata. Entomol. Expt. Appl. 98:109-113.
163. Yasui, Y. 1998. The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol. & Evol. 13: 246-250.
164. Zeh, J.H. & D. W. Zeh. 1994. Last-male sperm precedence breaks down when females mate with three males. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 257: 287-292.
165. Zeh, J. A. & Zeh, D. W. 2001. Reproductive mode and genetic benefits of polyandry. Animal Behav. 61:1051-1063.