Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: The regime hypothesis revisited

European Sociological Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 157-170

  Jæger, Mads Meier ^a  

^a VIVE THE DANISH CENTER FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748268574     PISSN: 02667215     EISSN: 14682672     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/esr/jci049     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Andress, H.-J. and Heien, T. (2001). Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 17, 337-356.
2. Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter? Acta Sociologica, 44, 283-299.
3. Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2002). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-the-Art Report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 237-158.
4. Bean, C. and Papadakis, E. (1998). A Comparison of Attitudes Towards the Welfare States in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985-1990. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 211-236.
5. Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003). Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies. A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations. European Sociological Review, 19, 415-427.
6. Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying Welfare States: A Two-dimension Approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26, 351-372.
7. Bonoli, G. (2000). Public Attitudes to Social Protection and Political Economy Traditions in Western Europe. European Societies, 2, 431-452.
8. Castles, F. G. and Mitchell, D. (1993). Worlds of Welfare and Family of Nations. In Castles, F. G. (Ed.) Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Europe. Dartmouth: Aldershot, 93-128.
9. Dayton, C. M. and Macready, G. B. (1988). Concomitant-variable Latent Class Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 173-178.
10. DiPrete, T. A. and Forristal, J. D. (1994). Multilevel Models: Methods and Substance. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 331-357.
11. Ebbes, P., Böckenholt U. and Wedel, M. (2004). Regressor and Random-effects Dependencies in Multilevel Models. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 161-178.
12. Edlund, J. (1999). Trust in Government and Welfare Regimes: Attitudes to Redistribution and Financial Cheating in the USA and Norway. European Journal of Political Research, 35, 341-370.
13. Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The Constant Flux. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Evans, G. (1996). Cross-national Differences in Support for Welfare and Redistribution: An Evaluation of Competing Theories. In Taylor, B. and Thompson, K. (Eds) Understanding Change in Social Attitudes. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 185-208.
17. Ferrera, M. (1996). The 'Southern' Model of Welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 17-37.
18. Flora, P. (Ed.) (1986a). Growth to Limits. The Western European Welfare States Since World War II, Volume 1: Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
19. Flora, P. (Ed.) (1986b). Growth to Limits. The Western European Welfare States Since World War II, Volume 2: Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
20. Gelissen, J. (2000). Popular Support for Institutionalised Solidarity: A Comparison between European Welfare States. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 285-300.
21. Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Heckman, J. J. and Singer, B. (1984). A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data. Econometrica, 52, 271-320.
23. Kaase, M. and Newton, K. (1998). What People Expect from the State: plus ca change... In Jowell, R., Curtice, J., Park, A., Brook, L., Thomson, K. and Bryson, C. (Eds) British - and European - Social Attitudes. The 15th Report. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 39-56.
24. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
25. Kangas, O. (1997). Self-interest and the Common Good: The Impact of Norms, Selfishness and Context in Social Policy Opinions. Journal of Socio-Economics, 26, 475-494.
26. Korpi, W. (1980). Social Policy and Distributional Conflict in the Capitalist Democracies. A Preliminary Comparative Framework. West European Politics, 3, 296-316.
27. Linos, K. and West, M. (2003). Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution. European Sociological Review, 19, 393-409.
28. Lipsmeyer, C. and Nordstrom, T. (2003). East versus West: Comparing Political Attitudes and Welfare Preferences Across European Societies. Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 339-364.
29. Mass, C. J. M. and Hox, J. H. (2004). Robustness Issues in Multilevel Regression Analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 127-137.
30. Mau, S. (2004). Welfare Regimes and the Norms of Social Exchange. Current Sociology, 52, 53-74.
31. McLachlan, G. and Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Distributions. New York: Wiley and Sons.
32. Nordlund, A. (1997). Attitudes Towards the Welfare State in the Scandinavian Countries. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 6, 233-246.
33. OECD (1999). Benefit Systems and Work Incentives. Paris: OECD.
34. OECD (2004). Social Expenditure Database. Paris: OECD.
35. Papadakis, E. and Bean, C. (1993). Popular Support for the Welfare State: A Comparison Between Institutional Regimes. Journal of Public Policy, 13, 228-254.
36. Peillon, M. (1996). A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Welfare Legitimacy. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 175-190
37. Pierson, P. (2001). Coping with Permanent Austerity. In Pierson, P. (Ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 410-456.
38. Roller, E. (1992). Einstellungen der Bürger zum Wohlfahrtsstaat der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
39. Rothstein, B. (1998). Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Scruggs, L. and Allan, J. (forthcoming). Welfare State Decommodification in Eighteen OECD Countries: A Replication and Revision. Journal of European Social Policy.
41. Shieh, Y.-Y. and Fouladi, R. T. (2003). The Effect of Multicollinearity on Multilevel Modeling Parameter Estimates and Standard Errors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 951-985.
42. Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement. European Journal of Political Science, 36, 175-205.
43. Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations. European Sociological Review, 13, 233-304.
44. Svallfors, S. (1999). Political Trust and Attitudes Towards Redistribution. A Comparison of Sweden and Norway. European Societies, 1, 241-268.
45. Svallfors, S. (2003). Welfare Regimes and Welfare Opinions: A Comparison of Eight Western Countries. Social Indicators Research, 64, 495-520.
46. Svallfors, S. (2004). Class, Attitudes and the Welfare State: Sweden in Comparative Perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 38, 119-138.
47. Taylor-Gooby, P. (1998). Commitment to the Welfare State. In Jowell, R., Curtice, J., Park, A., Brook, L., Thomson, K. and Bryson, C. (Eds) British - and European - Social Attitudes. The 15th Report. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 57-75.
48. Wedel, M. (2002). Concomitant Variables in Finite Mixture Models. Statistica Neerlandica, 55, 362-375.