A qualitative comparative analysis of welfare legitimacy

Journal of European Social Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 175-190

  Peillon, Michel ^a  

^a ST PATRICK S COLLEGE   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIAL POLICY; WELFARE LEGITIMACY;

EUROPE;

EID: 0030424730     PISSN: 09589287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/095892879600600301     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alber, J. (1988) Continuities and changes in the idea of the welfare state, Politics and Society 16 (4): 451-68.
2. Beedle, P. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983) Public opinion about taxation and welfare, Policy and Politics 11 (1): 15-39.
3. Coughlin, R. M. (1979) Social policy and ideology: public opinion in eight rich countries, Comparative Social Research 2: 3-40.
4. Coughlin, R. M. (1980) Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy. Attitudes Towards Taxes and Spending in Industrialized Societies, Berkeley, California, Institute of International Studies.
5. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, The Polity Press.
6. Flora, P. (ed) (1986) Growth to Limits. The Western European Welfare States since World War II, Berlin/New York, Walter De Gruyter.
7. Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A. J. (eds) (1982) The Development of Welfare State in Europe and America, New Brunswick and London, Transaction Publishers.
8. Habermas, J. (1976) Legitimation crisis, London, Heinemann.
9. Lewis, A. (1980) Attitudes to public expenditures and their relationship to voting preferences, Political Studies 28 (2): 284-92.
10. Marshall, T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
11. Mayntz, R. (1975) Legitimacy and the directive capacity of the political system, in L. N. Lindberg, R. Ashford, C. Crouch and C. Offe (eds) Stress and Contradiction in Modern Capitalism, Lexington Massachusetts, Lexington Books.