Concomitant variables in finite mixture models

Statistica Neerlandica

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 362-375

  Wedel, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Concomitant variable mixture; Discriminant analysis; Logistic discrimination; Mixture regression

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035982949     PISSN: 00390402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.t01-1-00072     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aitkin, M. and D.B. Rubin (1985), Estimation and hypothesis testing in finite mixture distributions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 47, 67-75.
2. Akaike, H. (1974), A new look at statistical model identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-19, 716-723.
3. Bozdogan, H. (1987), Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions, Psychometrika 52, 345-370.
4. Clogg, C.C. and L.A. Goodman (1984), Latent structure analysis of a set of multidimensional contingency tables, Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 762-771.
5. Damien, P. and S. Walker (1999), A note on Ramaswamy, Chatterjee and Cohen's latent joint segmentation models, Journal of Marketing Research 36, 115-119.
6. Dayton, C.M. and G.B. MacReady (1988), Concomitant variable latent class models, Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 173-178.
7. Dempster, A.P., N.M. Laird and R.B. Rubin (1977), Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM-algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39, 1-38.
8. Diebolt J. and E.H.S. Ip (1996), Stochastic EM: method and application, in: W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson and D.J. Spiegelhalter (eds), Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 259-274.
9. Diebolt, J. and C.P. Robert (1994), Estimation of finite mixture distributions through Bayesian sampling, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 56, 363-375.
10. Dillon, W.R., A. Kumar and M. Smith De Borero (1993), Capturing individual differences in paired comparisons: an extended BTL model incorporating descriptor variables, Journal of Marketing Research 30, 42-51.
11. Everitt, B.S. and D.J. Hand (1981), Finite mixture distributions, Monographs on Applied Probability and Statistics, Chapman and Hall, London.
12. Foremann, A.K. (1991), Linear logistic latent class analysis for polytomous data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 87, 476-486.
13. Geisser, S. (1967), Estimation associated with linear discriminants, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 807-817.
14. Gupta, S. and P.K. Chintagunta (1994), On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models, Journal of Marketing Research 31, 128-136.
15. Hennig, C. (2000), On the identifiability of mixture regression models, Journal of Classification 17, 273-296.
16. Kamakura, W.A., M. Wedel and J. Agrawal (1994), Concomitant variable latent class models for conjoint analysis, International Journal for Research in Marketing 11, 451-464.
17. Langeheine, R. and J. Rost (1988), Latent trait and latent class models, Plenum Press, New York.
18. Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin (1987), Statistical analysis with missing data, John Wiley, New York.
19. McLachlan, G.J. (1992), Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition, John Wiley, New York.
20. McLachlan, G.J. and K.E. Basford (1988), Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering, Marcel Dekker, New York.
21. McLachlan, G.J. and D. Peel (2000), Finite mixture models, John Wiley, New York.
22. MacReady, G.B. and C.M. Dayton (1980), The nature and use of state mastery models, Applied Psychological Measurement 4, 493-516.
23. Newcomb, S. (1886), A generalized theory of the combination of observations so as to obtain the best result, American Journal of Mathematics 8, 343-366.
24. Peng, F., R.A. Jacobs and M.A. Tanner (1996), Bayesian inference in mixtures of experts and hierarchical mixtures of experts models with an application to speech recognition, Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 953-960.
25. Quandt, R.E. (1972), A new approach to estimating switching regressions, Journal of the American Statistical Association 67, 306-310.
26. Quandt, R.E. and J.B. Ramsey (1978), Estimating mixtures of normal distributions and switching regressions, Journal of the American Statistical Association 73, 730-738.
27. Sammel, M.D. and L.M. Ryan (1996), Latent variable models with fixed effects, Biometrics 52, 220-243.
28. Sammel, M.D., L.M. Ryan and J.M. Legler (1997), Latent variable models for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 59, 667-678.
29. Schwarz, N. (1978), Estimating the dimension of a model, Annals of Statistics 6, 461-464.
30. Titterington, D.M., A.F.M. Smith and U.E. Makov (1985), Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions, John Wiley, New York.
31. Wang, P., I.M. Cockburn and M.L. Puterman (1998), Analysis of patent data - a mixed-Poisson-regression-model approach, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 16, 17-41.
32. Wedel, M. and W.S. Desarbo (1995), A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models, Journal of Classification 12, 1-35.
33. Wedel, M. and W.S. Desarbo (2001), Segment profiling with mixture models, Marketing Letters, forthcoming.
34. Wedel, M. and W.A. Kamakura (1999), Market segmentation: conceptual and methodological foundations, Kluwer, Dordrecht.