Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?

Acta Sociologica

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 283-299

  Arts, Wil ^a   Gelissen, John ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996245980     PISSN: 00016993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000169930104400401     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arts, W. A. 1995. Prinzipien der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit. Die theoretische Rekonstruktion der soziologischen Zugangsweisen. In H. Müller & B. Wegener (eds.). Soziale Ungleichheit und soziale Gerechtigkeit, pp. 107-131. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
2. Arts, W. A. & Gelissen, J. 1999a. Verzorgingsstaten in soorten: Op zoek naar ideaal-en reële typen. Mens & Maatschappij, 74, 143-165.
3. Arts. W. A. & Gelissen, J. 1999b, August. Welfare States, Solidarity, and Justice Principles: Docs the Type Really Matter? Paper presented at the Third European Sociological Association Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
4. Arts, W. A. & Hermkens, P. 1994. De eerlijke verdeling van huishoudelijke taken: Percepties en oordelen. Mens & Maatschappij, 69, 147-168.
5. Arts, W. A. Hermkens. P. & van Wijk. P. 1995. Justice evaluation of income distribution in East and West. In J. R. Kluegel D. S. Mason & B. Wegener (eds.). Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, pp. 131-150. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
6. Arts, W. A. & van der Veen, R. 1992. Sociological approaches to distributive justice and procedural justice. In K. R. Scherer (ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 143-176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bayertz, K. 1998. Solidaritt: Begriff und Problem. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
8. Becker, U. 1996. Over de typologie van welvaartsbestellen: Esping-Andersens theorie in discussie. Beleid & Maatschappij, 23, 19-30.
9. Berger, J., Fisek, R. Z., Norman, R. Z. & Wagner, D. G. 1985. Formation of reward expectations in status situations. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (eds.). Status, Rewards and Influence: How Expectations Organize Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Berger. J., Zelditch, M., Anderson. B. & Cohen, B. P. 1972. Structural aspects of distributive justice. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch & B. Anderson (eds.). Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. 2, pp. 119-146. Boston: Houghton-Miffin.
11. Bonoli, G. 1997. Classifying welfare states: A two-dimensional approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26, 351-372.
12. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. in K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (eds.). Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 136-162. Newbury Park: Sage.
13. Castles, F. G. 1996. Needs-based strategies of social protection in Australia and New Zealand. In G. Esping-Andersen (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, pp. 88-115. London: Sage.
14. Castles, F. G. & Mitchell, D. 1993. Worlds of welfare and families of nations. In F. G. Castles (ed.). Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies, pp. 93-128. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
15. d'Anjou, L., Steijn. A. & Aarsen, D. van. 1995. Social position. ideology and distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 8, 351-384.
16. Deutsch. M. 1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-150.
17. Doreian, P. & Fararo, T. J. 1997. The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
18. Eckhoff, T. 1974. Justice: Its Determinants in Social Interaction-Sociology, Law and Legal Theory. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
19. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.
20. Esping-Andersen, G. 1994. Welfare states and the economy. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (eds.). The Handbook of Economic Sociology, pp. 711-732. Princeton & New York: Princeton University Press/Russel Sage Foundation.
21. Esping-Andersen, G. 1996. Welfare states without work:.the impasse of labour shedding and familialism in Continental European social policy. In G. Esping-Andersen (ed.). Welfare States in Transition, pp. 66-87. London: Sage.
22. Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Ferrera, M. 1996. The ‘southern’ model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 6, 17-37.
24. Gelissen. J. 2001. Worlds of welfare, worlds of consent? Public opinion on the welfare state. [Doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
25. Giddens. A. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Later Modem Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26. Goodin. R. E. Heady, B., Muffels. R. & Dirven, H.-J. 1999. The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Goodman, R. & Peng. I. 1996. The East Asian welfare states: peripatetic learning, adaptive change, and nation-building. In G. Esping-Andersen (ed.). Welfare Stales in Transition, pp. 192-224. London: Sage.
28. Greenleaf, E. A. 1992. Measuring extreme response style. Public Opinion Quarterly. 56, 328-351.
29. Gundelach. P. 1994. National value differences: modernization or institutionalization? International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 35, 37-58.
30. Hegtved. K. A. 1992, When is a distribution rule just? Rationality and Society. 4, 308-331.
31. Hill, M. 1996. Social Policy: A Comparative Analysis. London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
32. Jasso, G. 1989. The theory of the distributive justice force in human affairs: analysing the three central questions, in J. Berger, M. Zelditsch & B. Anderson (eds.). Sociological Theories in Progress, pp. 354-387. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Jasso, G. & Wegener, B. 1997. Methods for empirical justice analysis: Part 1. Framework, models, and quantities. Social Justice Research. 10, 393-430.
34. Kahneman. D. & Tversky. A. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
35. Kangas. O. E. 1997. Self-interest and the common good: the impact of norms, selfishness and context in social policy opinions. Journal of Socio-Economics, 26, 475-494.
36. Kluegel, J. R. & Miyano, M. 1995. Justice beliefs and support for the welfare state in advanced capitalism, in J. R. Kluegel, D. S. Mason & B. Wegener (eds.). Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, pp. 81-105. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
37. Leibfried. S. 1992. Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community. In Z. Ferge & J. E. Kolberg (eds.). Social Policy in a Changing Europe, pp. 245-279. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
38. Leventhal, G. S. 1976. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (eds.). Equity Theory: Towards a General Theory of Social Interaction, pp. 91-131. New York: Academic Press.
39. Lindenberg. S. 1993. Framing, empirical evidence, and applications. In: Jahrbuch für neue politische Oekonomie, pp. 11-38.
40. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Lindenberg. S. 1997. Solidarity: its micro foundations and macro dependence. A framing approach. In P. Doreian & T. J. Fararo (eds.), The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
41. Marshall. G. Swift, A. & Roberts, S. 1997. Against the Odds? Social Class and Social Justice in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Marshall. G., Swift. A., Routh, D. & Burgoyne. C. 1999. What is and what ought to be: popular beliefs about distributive justice in thirteen countries. European Sociological Review, 15, 349-367.
43. Miller, D. 1976. Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Miller, D. 1992. Distributive justice: what the people think. Ethics. 102, 555-593.
45. Montanari. I. 2001. Modernization, globalization and the welfare state: a comparative analysis of old and new convergence of social insurance since 1930. British Journal of Sociology 52, 469-194.
46. Oorschot. van, W. 1997. Nederland over solidariteit. Sociaal Bestek. 59, 27-32.
47. Oorschot. van. W. & Komter. A. 1998. What is it that ties… ?-Theoretical perspectives on social bond. Sociale Wetenschappen. 41, 5-24.
48. Peillon. M. 1996. A qualitative comparative analysis of welfare state legitimacy. Journal of European Social Policy. 6, 175-190.
49. Rescher. N. 1966. Distributive Justice: A Constructive Critique of the Utilitarian Theory of Distribution. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
50. Schwinger. T. 1980. Just allocation of goods, decisions among three principles, in G. Mikula (ed.). Justice and Social Interaction, pp. 95-125. Bern: Huber.
51. Sklair, L. 1991. Sociology of the Global System. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
52. Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
53. Svallfors, S. 1993. Dimensions of inequality: a comparison of attitudes in Sweden and Britain. European Sociological Review, 9, 267-287.
54. Svallfors. S. 1997. Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: aa comparison of eight Western nations. European Sociological Review. 13, 283-304.
55. Swift, A., Marshall. G. Burgoyne, C. & Routh. D. 1995. Distributive justice: Does it matter what the people think? In J. R. Kluegel, D. S. Mason & B. Wegener (eds.). Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, pp. 15-47. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
56. Törnblom. K. 1992. The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. R. Scherer (ed.). Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 177-236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.