History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 741-756

  Bashour, Mounir ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; CEPHALOMETRY; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTIST; EVOLUTION; FACE; HUMAN; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SURGEON; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ART; BEAUTY; CEPHALOMETRY; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; CULTURE; ESTHETICS; EVOLUTION; FACE; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; GOALS; HISTORY, 15TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 16TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 17TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 18TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HISTORY, ANCIENT; HISTORY, MEDIEVAL; HUMANS; LIBIDO; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MARRIAGE; PUBERTY; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33748260005     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000233051.61512.65     Document Type: Review

References (159)

1. Tolleth, H. Parameters of Caucasian attractiveness. In W. E. Matory (Ed.), Ethnic Considerations in Facial Aesthetic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998. P. 39.
2. Vegter, F., and Hage, J. J. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106: 1090, 2000.
3. Farkas, L. G., Hreczko, T. A., Kolar, J. C., et al. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revision of neoclassical canons. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 75: 328, 1985.
4. Farkas, L. G., Katic, M. J., Hreczko, T. A., et al. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am. J. Orthod. 86: 52, 1984.
5. Farkas, L. G., Kolar, J. C., and Munro, I. R. Geography of the Nose in an Attractive Face: A Morphometric Study. Madrid: International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1985. P. 36.
6. Tolleth, H. Aesthetics and plastic surgery. In E. O. Terino and R. S. Flowers (Eds.), The Art of Alloplastic Facial Contouring. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000. P. 3.
7. Farkas, L. G., and Kolar, J. C. Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women's faces. Clin. Plast. Surg. 14: 599, 1987.
8. Farkas, L. G., Forrest, C. R., and Litsas, L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 24: 179, 2000.
9. Dawei, W., Guozheng, Q., Mingli, Z., et al. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 21: 265, 1997.
10. Broadbent, B. H., and Golden, W. H. Bolton Standards of Dentofacial Developmental Growth. St. Louis: Mosby, 1975.
11. Sassouni, V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am. J. Orthod. 55: 109, 1969.
12. Delaire, J., Schendel, S. A., and Tulasne, J. F. An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: A new lateral cephalometric analysis. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 52: 226, 1981.
13. Burstone, C. J., James, R. B., Legan, H., et al. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J. Oral Surg. 36: 269, 1978.
14. Legan, H. L., and Burstone, C. J. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J. Oral Surg. 38: 744, 1980.
15. Obwegeser, H. L., and Marentette, L. J. Profile planning based on alterations in the positions of the bases of the facial thirds. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 44: 302, 1986.
16. Seghers, M., Longacre, J., and deStefano, G. The golden proportion and beauty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 34: 241, 1964.
17. Ricketts, R. M. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am. J. Orthod. 54: 272, 1968.
18. Ricketts, R. M. The golden divider. J. Clin. Orthod. 15: 752, 1981.
19. Ricketts, R. M. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics: The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 51: 115, 1981.
20. Ricketts, R. M. Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin. Plast. Surg. 9: 401, 1982.
21. Ricketts, R. M. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am. J. Orthod. 81: 351, 1982.
22. Marquardt, S. R. Method and apparatus for analyzing facial configurations and components. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 1997.
23. Marquardt, S. R. Method and apparatus for analyzing facial configurations and components. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 1999.
24. Bashour, M. An objective system to measure facial attractiveness. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118: 757, 2006.
25. Johnston, V. S. Method and apparatus for generating composites of human faces. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 1994.
26. Johnston, V. S., Solomon, C. J., Gibson, S. J., et al. Human facial beauty: Current theories and methodologies. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 5: 371, 2003.
27. Johnston, V. S. Why We Feel: The Science of Human Emotions. Reading, Mass.: Almquist & Wiksell, 1999.
28. Johnston, V. S., and Franklin, M. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethol. Sociobiol. 14: 183, 1993.
29. Johnston, V. S., and Oliver-Rodriguez, J. C. Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. J. Sex Res. 34: 188, 1997.
30. Hancock, P. J. B. Evolving faces from principal components. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 32: 327, 2000.
31. Hancock, P. J. B., and Frowd, C. D. Evolutionary generation of faces. In P. J. Bentley and D. W. Corne (Eds.), Creative Evolutionary Systems. London: Academic Press, 2002. P. 576.
32. Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 24: 285, 1972.
33. Adams, G. R., and Crane, P. An assessment of parents' and teachers' expectations of pre school children's social preference for attractive or unattractive children and adults. Child Dev. 51: 224, 1978.
34. Berscheid, E. A review of the psychological effects of physical attractiveness. In G. W. Lucker, K. A. Ribbens, and J. A. McNamara (Eds.), Psychological Aspects of Facial Form. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development University of Michigan, 1980. P. 1.
35. Berscheid, E., and Gangestad, S. The social psychological implications of facial physical attractiveness. Clin. Plast. Surg. 9: 289, 1982.
36. Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. H. Interpersonal Attraction, 2nd Ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
37. Dion, K. K. Childrens' physical attractiveness and sex as determinants of adult punitiveness. Dev. Psychol. 10: 772, 1974.
38. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., et al. What is beautiful is good but: A meta-analytic review of the research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychol. Bull. 110: 109, 1991.
39. Alley, T. R., and Hildebrandt, K. A. Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and Applied Aspects of Perceiving Faces: Resources for Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1988. P. 101.
40. Spencer, B. A., and Taylor, G. S. Effects of facial attractiveness and gender on causal attributions of managerial performance. Sex Roles 19: 273, 1988.
41. Etcoff, N. Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty. New York: Random House, 1999.
42. Buchanan, T., and Smith, J. L. Research on the Internet: Validation of a World-Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 31: 565, 1999.
43. Dipboye, R. L., and Fromkin, H. L. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. J. Appl. Psychol. 60: 39, 1975.
44. Quereshi, M. Y., and Kay, J. P. Physical attractiveness, age, and sex as determinants of reactions to resumes. Soc. Behav. Pers. 14: 103, 1986.
45. Cam, A., Siegfried, W. D., and Pearce, L. Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications: Impact on physical attractiveness and sex of applicant biases. Pers. Psychol. 34: 65, 1981.
46. Gilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A., and Love, K. G. Effects of applicant sex: Applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. J. Occup. Psychol. 59: 103, 1986.
47. Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., Stamper, B. G., et al. The effects of physical attractiveness and other demographic characteristics an promotion decisions. J. Manag. 16: 723, 1990.
48. Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., and Russell, J. Attractiveness and income for men and women in management. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21, 1991.
49. Roszell, P., and Kennedy, D. E. G. Physical attractiveness and income attainment among Canadians. J. Psychol. 123: 547, 1989.
50. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol. Bull. 126: 390, 2000.
51. Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., and Coats, G. The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Pers. Psychol. 56: 431, 2003.
52. Goldstein, A., and Papageorge, J. Judgments of facial attractiveness in the absence of eye movements. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15: 259, 1980.
53. Nakamura, K., Kawashima, R., Nagumo, S., et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of the assessment of facial attractiveness. Neuroreport 9: 753, 1998.
54. Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., et al. Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron 32: 537, 2001.
55. O'Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., et al. Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 41: 147, 2003.
56. Senior, C. Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron 38: 525, 2003.
57. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., and Gobbini, M. I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4: 223, 2000.
58. Kampe, K. K., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., et al. Reward value of attractiveness and gaze. Nature 413: 589, 2001.
59. Langton, S. R. H., Watt, R. J., and Bruce, V. Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4: 50, 2000.
60. Reis, V. A., and Zaidel, D. W. Brain and face: Communicating signals of health in the left and right sides of the face. Brain Cogn. 46: 240, 2001.
61. Zaidel, V. A. Functional asymmetry in the human face: Perception of health in the left and right sides of the face. Laterality 6: 225, 2001.
62. Chen, A. C., German, C., and Zaidel, D. W. Brain asymmetry and facial attractiveness: Facial beauty is not simply in the eye of the beholder. Neuropsychologia 35: 471, 1997.
63. Zaidel, D. W., Chen, A. C., and German, C. She is not a beauty even when she smiles: Possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia 33: 649, 1995.
64. Zaidel, D. W., and Fitzgerald, P. Sex of the face in Western art: Left and right in portraits. Empir. Stud. Arts 12: 9, 1994.
65. Barber, N. The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethol. Sociobiol. 16: 395, 1995.
66. Buss, D. M. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Harper Collins, 1995.
67. Miller, G. The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. London: William Heinemann, 2000.
68. Daly, M., and Wilson, M. Evolutionary theory and parental motives. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1987. P. 91.
69. Gangestad, S. W., and Thornhill, R. The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evol. Hum. Behav. 18: 69, 1997.
70. Thornhill, R., and Gangestad, S. W. Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Hum. Nat. 4: 237, 1993.
71. Symons, D. The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
72. Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. New York: D. Appleton, 1860.
73. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Hurst, 1870.
74. Miller, G. F. How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In C. Crawford and D. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Ideas, Issues, and Applications. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1998. P. 663.
75. Grammer, K., and Thornhill, R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. J. Comp. Psychol. 108: 233, 1994.
76. Donovan, J. M. Book review: Facial attractiveness. Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives. Hum. Nat. Rev. 3: 226, 2003.
77. Galton, F. Composite portraits. I.M.E. Bull. 8: 132, 1878.
78. Burson, N., Carling, R., and Kramlich, D. Composites: Computer Generated Portraits. New York: Beach Tree Books, 1986.
79. Langlois, J. H., and Roggman, L. A. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol. Sci. 1: 115, 1990.
80. Rubenstein, A. J., Langlois, J. H., and Roggman, L. A. What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty. In G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001.
81. Hamilton, W. D., and Zuk, M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218: 384, 1982.
82. Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., and Musselman, L. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychol. Sci. 5: 214, 1994.
83. Rhodes, G., Sumich, A., and Byatt, G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychol. Sci. 10: 52, 1999.
84. Rhodes, G., and Tremewan, T. Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychol. Sci. 7: 105, 1996.
85. Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M, et al. Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001.
86. Rosch, E. H. Principles of categorization. In E. H. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1978. P. 27.
87. Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A, et al. Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001.
88. Bashour, M. The Human Face and Its Eyes: An Analysis of Their Mathematics, Aesthetics, and Anthropometrics. Toronto: Institute of Medical Sciences and Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 2004.
89. Marquardt, S. R. Marquardt Beauty Analysis (Web site). Available at: www.beautyanalysis.com. Accessed on March 5, 2005.
90. Alley, T. R., and Cunningham, M. R. Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol. Sci. 2: 123, 1991.
91. Benson, P. J., and Perrett, D. I. Synthesising continuoustone caricatures. Image Vision Comput. 9: 123, 1991.
92. Enquist, M., and Arak, A. Neural representation and the evolution of signal form. In R. Dukas (Ed.), Cognitive Ecology. Chicago: Chicago Press, 1998. P. 21.
93. Enquist, M., and Johnstone, R. A. Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 264: 1345, 1997.
94. Ghirlanda, S., and Enquist, M. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control. Anim. Behav. 56: 1383, 1998.
95. Fink, B., Grammer, K., and Thornhill, R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. J. Comp. Psychol. 115: 92, 2001.
96. Steinberger, E., Rodriguezrigau, L. J., Smith, K. D., et al. The menstrual-cycle and plasma testosterone levels in women with acne. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 4: 54, 1981.
97. Schiavone, F. E., Rietschel, R. L., Sgoutas, D., et al. Elevated free testosterone levels in women with acne. Arch. Dermatol. 119: 799, 1983.
98. Moller, A. P., and Swaddle, J. P. Developmental Stability and Evolution . New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
99. Leung, B., and Forbes, M. R. Fluctuating asymmetry in relation to stress and fitness: Effect of trait type as revealed by meta-analysis. Ecoscience 3: 400, 1996.
100. Moller, A. P. Developmental stability and fitness: A review. Am. Nat. 149: 916, 1997.
101. Moller, A. P., and Thornhill, R. A meta-analysis of the heritability of developmental stability. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 1, 1997.
102. Moller, A. P., and Thornhill, R. Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 151: 174, 1998.
103. Thornhill, R., and Gangestad, S. W. Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychol. Sci. 5: 297, 1994.
104. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., and Lewis-Jones, D. I. Developmental stability, ejaculate size, and sperm quality in men. Evol. Hum. Behav. 19: 273, 1998.
105. Waynforth, D. C. Male mating strategies among the Mayas of Belize (men). Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, 1999.
106. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H., et al. Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 18: 223, 1997.
107. Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M, et al. Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 5: 659, 1998.
108. Mealey, L., Bridgstock, R., and Townsend, G. C. Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: A monozygotic co-twin comparison. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76: 151, 1999.
109. Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W., and Thornhill, R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266: 1913, 1999.
110. Fink, B., and Penton-Voak, I. Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11: 154, 2002.
111. Alley, T. R. The effects of growth and aging on facial aesthetics. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and Applied Aspects of Perceiving Faces: Resources for Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1988. P. 51.
112. Henss, R. Perceiving age and attractiveness in facial photographs. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21: 933, 1991.
113. Mathes, E. W., Brennan, S. M., Haugen, P. M, et al. Ratings of physical attractiveness as a function of age. J. Soc. Psychol. 125: 157, 1985.
114. Zebrowitz, L. A., Olson, K., and Hoffman, K. Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64: 453, 1993.
115. Eibl-Ebesfeldt, I. Human Ethology. New York: Aldine DeGruyter, 1989.
116. Alley, T. R. Infantile head shape as an elicitor of adult protection. Merrill Palmer Q. Dev. Psychol. 29: 411, 1983.
117. Pittenger, J. B., and Shaw, R. E. Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: Implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1: 374, 1975.
118. Todd, J. T., Mark, L. S., Shaw, R. E., et al. Perception of human growth. Sci. Am. 242: 132, 1980.
119. Hildebrandt, K. A., and Fitzgerald, H. The infant's physical attractiveness: Its effects on bonding and attachment. Infant Ment. Health J. 4: 3, 1983.
120. McCabe, V. Abstract perceptual information for age level: A risk factor for maltreatment. Child Dev. 55: 267, 1984.
121. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., and Philhower, C. L. Dimensions of facial physical attractiveness: The intersection of biology and culture. In G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001. P. 193.
122. Cunningham, M. R. Sociobiology as a supplementary paradigm for social psychological research. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981. P. 69.
123. Cunningham, M. R. Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 925, 1986.
124. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., and Pike, C. L. What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 61, 1990.
125. McArthur, L. Z., and Apatow, K. Impressions of babyfaced adults. Soc. Cogn. 2: 315, 1983.
126. Campbell, M. R. The Impact of Facial Feature Attractiveness on Helping Behavior: A Sociobiological Examination of Males' Perception of Female Faces. Louisville, Ky.: University of Louisville, 1991.
127. Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., et al. "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68: 261, 1995.
128. Jones, D., and Hill, K. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum. Nat. 4: 271, 1993.
129. Jones, D. Sexual selection, physical attractiveness and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Curr. Anthropol. 36: 723, 1995.
130. Jones, D. Physical Attractiveness and the Theory of Sexual Selection: Results from Five Populations, Vol. 90. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1996.
131. Dehart, D. D. Does Sexual Orientation Affect Social Perception? Perceived Attractiveness and Stereotypic Beliefs about Homosexuality. Louisville, Ky.: University of Louisville, 1992. P. 134.
132. Folstad, I., and Karter, A. J. Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. Am. Nat. 139: 603, 1992.
133. Enlow, D. H., and Hans, M. G. Essentials of Facial Growth. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996.
134. Tanner, J. M. Foetus Into Man: Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity. London: Open Books, 1978.
135. Muscarella, F., and Cunningham, M. R. The evolutionary significance and social perception of male pattern baldness and facial hair. Ethol. Sociobiol. 17: 99, 1996.
136. Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., Segall, M. H., et al. Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 40: 615, 1981.
137. Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., and Segall, M. H. A cross cultural examination of physiognomic traits of dominance and attractiveness. Ethol. Sociobiol. 2: 41, 1981.
138. Keating, C. F. Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Soc. Psychol. Q. 48: 61, 1985.
139. Friedman, H., and Zebrowitz, L. A. The contribution of typical sex differences in facial maturity to sex role stereotypes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18: 430, 1992.
140. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., et al. Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22: 251, 2001.
141. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., et al. Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268: 1617, 2001.
142. Penton-Voak, I. S., and Perrett, D. I. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21: 39, 2000.
143. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 399: 741, 1999.
144. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394: 884, 1998.
145. Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., et al. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Dev. Psychol. 27: 79, 1991.
146. Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Casey, R. J., et al. Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Dev. Psychol. 31: 464, 1995.
147. Zebrowitz, L. A., and Rhodes, G. Nature let a thousand flowers bloom: The multiple ways and wherefores of attractiveness. In G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001.
148. Thornhill, R., and Gangestad, S. W. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3: 452, 1999.
149. Bernstein, I. H., Lin, T. D., and McClellan, P. Cross- vs. within-racial judgements of attractiveness. Percept. Psychophys. 32: 495, 1982.
150. Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M., and Lee, H. K. They don't all look alike: Individuated impressions of other racial groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 85, 1993.
151. Thakerer, J., and Iwawaki, S. Cross-cultural comparisons in interpersonal attraction of females toward males. J. Soc. Psychol. 108: 121, 1979.
152. Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, T., Richards, T, et al. The Facialmetric Prediction of Physical Attractiveness across Races, Ethnic Groups and Cultures. Louisville, Ky.: University of Louisville, 1989.
153. Rhodes, G., and Zebrowitz, L. A. Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001.
154. Dion, K. K. Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness. In G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001. Pp. 239-260.
155. Rhodes, G., Harwood, K., Yoshikawa, S., et al. The attractiveness of average faces: Cross cultural evidence and possible biological basis. In G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in Visual Cognition-Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, Cultural, and Motivational Perspectives. Westport, Conn.: Ablex, 2001.
156. Enquist, M., and Arak, A. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372: 169, 1994.
157. Farkas, L. G. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. New York: Raven Press, 1994.
158. Farkas, L. G., and Munro, I. R. Anthropometric Facial Proportions in Medicine. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1986.
159. Terino, E. O., and Flowers, R. S. The Art of Alloplastic Facial Contouring. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000.