External factors associated with adopting a CMS in resident college courses

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 163-174

  Malikowski, Steven R ^a   Thompson, Merton E ^a   Theis, John G ^a  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CMS features; Course management systems; Distance education

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS;

CMS FEATURES; COURSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (CMS); RESIDENT COURSES;

DISTANCE EDUCATION;

EID: 33748258511     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen B.S., Otto R.G., and Hoffman B. Media as lived environments: The ecological psychology of educational technology. In: Jonassen D.H. (Ed). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. 2nd ed. (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J. 215-241
2. Allen I.E., and Seaman J. Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004 (Research report no. 0-9677741-8-7) (2004), Sloan Center for Online Education, Needham, MA
3. Ansorge C.J., and Bendus O. The pedagogical impact of course management systems on faculty, students and institutions. In: Bruning R.H., Horn C.A., and PytlikZillig L.M. (Eds). Web-based learning: What do we know? Where do we go? (2003), Information Age Pub, Greenwich, Conn. xxii 275 pp
4. Arabasz P., Pirani J.A., and Fawcett D. Supporting e-learning in higher education (Research report no. volume 3, 2003) (2003), EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, CO
5. Bongey S.B., Cizadlo G., and Kalnbach L. Using a course management system (CMS) to meet the challenges of large lecture classes. Campus-Wide Information Systems (2005) 252-262
6. Braxton J.M., Eimers M.T., and Bayer A.E. The implications of teaching norms for the improvement of undergraduate education. Journal of Higher Education 67 6 (1996) 603-625
7. Driscoll M.P. Psychology of learning for instruction. 3rd ed. (2005), Pearson Allyn and Bacon, Boston
8. Dutton W.H., Cheong P.H., and Park N. An ecology of constraints on e-learning in higher education: The case of a virtual learning environment. Prometheus 22 2 (2004) 131-149
9. Ertmer P., and Newby T.J. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly 6 4 (1993) 50-71
10. Falvo, D.A., & Johnson, B.F. (2005, March 2005). Use and implementation of learning management systems in the US. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, 2005 16th Annual International Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
11. Fraenkel J.R., and Wallen N.E. How to design and evaluate research in education (1990), McGraw-Hill Pub. Co, New York
12. Gagné R.M., Briggs L.J., and Wager W.W. Principles of instructional design. 4th ed. (1992), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth
13. Grabe M., and Christopherson K. Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of providing lecture notes: The role of internet technology as a delivery system and research tool. Internet and Higher Education 8 (2005) 291-298
14. Grant M.M. Learning to teach with the web: Factors influencing teacher education faculty. Internet and Higher Education 7 (2004) 329-341
15. Green, K. (2001, Accessed on 1-5-06). Ecommerce comes slowly to the campus, from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/2000/index.html
16. Hannafin M.J., and Rieber L.P. Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer based instructional technologies, part 1. Educational Technology Research and Development 37 2 (1989) 91-101
17. Jonassen D.H., and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. 2nd ed. (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J.
18. Malikowski, S.R., Thompson, M.E., & Theis, J.G. (in press). A model for research into course management systems: Bridging technology and learning theory.
19. Morgan G. Faculty use of course management systems (2003), EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, CO
20. Reigeluth C.M. Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J.
21. Saettler L.P. The evolution of American educational technology (1990), Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colo.
22. Shrock S.A. A brief history of instructional development. In: Anglin G.J. (Ed). Instructional technology: past, present, and future (1991), Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colo. 11-19
23. Smeby J.-C. Disciplinary differences in university teaching. Studies in Higher Education 21 1 (1996) 69-79
24. Toothaker L.E. Multiple comparison procedures (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
25. Woods R., Baker J.D., and Hopper D. Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of Web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. Internet and Higher Education 7 4 (2004) 281-297