Positive selection versus demography: Evolutionary inferences based on an unusual haplotype structure in Drosophila simulans

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1643-1647

  Quesada, Humberto ^a,b   Ramos Onsins, Sebastián E ^b   Rozas, Julio ^b   Aguadé, Montserrat ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bottleneck; Coalescent simulations; Drosophila; Population admixture; Selective sweep

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; DNA RECOMBINATION; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; EVOLUTION; GENE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMIC FRAGMENT; HAPLOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NULL ALLELE; POPULATION GENETICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DEMOGRAPHY; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; HAPLOTYPES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION (GENETICS); SELECTION, GENETIC;

DROSOPHILA SIMULANS;

EID: 33748202027     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl031     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akey JM, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Carlson CS, Shriver MD, Nickerson DA, Kruglyak L. 2004. Population history and natural selection shape patterns of genetic variation in 132 genes. PLoS Biol 2:1591-9.
2. Bauer DuMont V, Aquadro CF. 2005. Multiple signatures of positive selection downtream of Notch on the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 171:639-53.
3. Beisswanger S, Stephan W, De Lorenzo D. 2006. Evidence for a selective swep in the wapl region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172:265-74.
4. Depaulis F, Mousset S, Veuille M. 2003. Power of neutrality tests to detect bottlenecks and hitchhiking. J Mol Evol 57:S190-200.
5. Fay JC, Wu CI. 1999. A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol 16:1003-5.
6. Glinka S, Ometto L, Mousset S, Stephan W, De Lorenzo D. 2003. Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach. Genetics 165:1269-78.
7. Haddrill PR, Thornton KR, Charlesworth B, Andolfatto P. 2005. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genome Res 15:790-9.
8. Hamblin MT, Veuille M. 1999. Population structure among African and derived populations of Drosophila simulans: evidence for ancient subdivision and recent admixture. Genetics 153:305-17.
9. Harr B, Kauer M, Schlötterer C. 2002. Hitchhiking mapping: a population-based fine-mapping strategy for adaptive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12949-54.
10. Hey J, Kliman RM. 2002. Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. Genetics 160:595-608.
11. Hudson RR. 1987. Estimating recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection. Genet Res 50:245-50.
12. Hudson RR. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. In: Harvey PL, Partridge L, editors. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. New York: Oxford University Press. p 1-44.
13. Kelly JK. 1997. A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations. Genetics 146:1197-206.
14. Lachaise D, Cariou ML, David JR, Lemeunier F, Tsacas L, Ashburner M. 1988. Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol Biol 22:159-225.
15. Markovtsova L, Marjoram P, Tavaré S. 2001. On a test of Depaulis and Veuille. Mol Biol Evol 18:1132-3.
16. Meiklejohn CD, Kim Y, Hartl DL, Parsch J. 2004. Identification of a locus under complex positive selection in Drosophila simulans by haplotype mapping and composite-likelihood estimation. Genetics 168:265-79.
17. Ometto L, Glinka S, De Lorenzo D, Stephan W. 2005. Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol 22:2119-2130.
18. Orengo DJ, Aguadé M. 2004. Detecting the footprint of positive selection in a European population of Drosophila melanogaster: multilocus pattem of variation and distance to coding regions. Genetics 167:1759-66.
19. Parsch J, Meiklejohn CD, Hartl DL. 2001. Patterns of DNA sequence variation suggest the recent action of positive selection in the janus-ocnus region of Drosophila simulans. Genetics 159:647-57.
20. Pool JE, Bauer DuMont V, Mueller JL, Aquadro CF. 2006. A scan of molecular variation leads to the narrow localization of a selective sweep affecting both afrotropical and cosmopolitan populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172:1093-105.
21. Powell JR. 1997. Progress and prospects in evolutionary biology: the Drosophila model. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Przeworski M. 2002. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics 160:1179-89.
23. Quesada H, Ramirez UEM, Rozas J, Aguadé M. 2003. Large-scale adaptive hitchhiking upon high recombination in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 165:895-900.
24. Rozas J, Gullaud M, Blandin G, Aguadé M. 2001. DNA variation at the rp49 gene region of Drosophila simulans: evolutionary inferences from an unusual haplotype structure. Genetics 158:1147-55.
25. Schmid KJ, Ramos-Onsins S, Ringys-Beckstein H, Weisshaar B, Mitchell-Olds T. 2005. A multilocus sequence survey in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a genome-wide departure from a neutral model of DNA sequence polymorphism. Genetics 169:1601-15.
26. Thornton K. 2005. Recombination and the properties of Tajima's D in the context of approximate likelihood calculation. Genetics 171:2143-2148.
27. Wright SI, Gaut BS. 2005. Molecular population genetics and the search for adaptive evolution in plants. Mol Biol Evol 22:506-19.