The effect of response uncertainty on illusory biases of perception and action

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 406, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 117-121

  Keetch, Katherine M ^a   Glazebrook, Cheryl M ^a   Lyons, James ^a   Lam, Melanie Y ^b   Weeks, Daniel J ^c   Elliott, Digby ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action; M ller Lyer Illusion; Perception; Response Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33747787288     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.025     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aglioti S., Goodale M.A., and DeSouza J.F.X. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biol. 5 (1995) 679-685
2. de Grave D.D.J., Brenner E., and Smeets J.B.J. Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead?. Vis. Res. 42 (2002) 2279-2285
3. de Grave D.D.J., Brenner E., and Smeets J.B.J. Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Exp. Brain Res. 155 (2004) 56-62
4. Elliott D., Hansen S., Mendoza J., and Tremblay L. Learning to optimize speed, accuracy and energy expenditure: a preliminary framework for understanding speed accuracy relations in target-directed aiming. J. Mot. Behav. 36 (2004) 339-351
5. Elliott D., Helsen W.F., and Chua R. A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal directed aiming. Psychol. Bull. 3 (2001) 342-357
6. Elliott D., and Lee T.D. The role of target information on manual-aiming bias. Psychol. Res. 58 (1995) 2-9
7. Engelbrecht S.E., Berthier N.E., and O'Sullivan L.P. The undershooting bias: learning to act optimally under uncertainty. Psychol. Sci. 14 (2003) 257-261
8. Feldman A.G. Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. II. Controllable parameters of the muscles. Biophysics 11 (1966) 565-578
9. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends. Cog. Neurosci. 5 (2001) 457-459
10. Franz V.H., Fahle M., Beulthoff H.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Effects of visual illusions on grasping. J. Exp. Psychol: Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (2001) 1124-1144
11. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bulthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasping illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol. Sci. 11 (2000) 20-25
12. Glazebrook C.M., Dhillon V.P., Keetch K.M., Lyons J., Amazeen E., Weeks D.J., and Elliott D. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?. Exp. Brain Res. 160 (2005) 71-78
13. Glover S.R. Separate representations in the planning and control of action. Behav. Brain Sci. 27 (2004) 3-24
14. Glover S.R., and Dixon P. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and the control of reaching. J. Exp. Psychol: Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (2001) 560-572
15. Handlovsky I., Hansen S., Lee T.D., and Elliott D. The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control. Neurosci. Lett. 366 (2004) 308-311
16. S. Hansen, C.M. Glazebrook, J.G Anson, D.J. Weeks, D. Elliott, The influence of advance information about target location and visual feedback on movement planning and execution, Can. J. Exp. Psychol., in press.
17. J. Lyons, S. Hansen, S. Hurding, D. Elliott, Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications, Exp. Brain Res., (2006) [epub ahead of print].
18. Meegan D.V., Glazebrook C.M., Dhillon V.P., Tremblay L., Welsh T.N., and Elliott D. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Exp. Brain Res. 155 (2004) 37-47
19. Mendoza J.E., Elliott D., Meegan D.V., Lyons J., and Welsh T.N. The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 32 (2006) 413-422
20. Mendoza J., Hansen S., Glazebrook C.M., Keetch K.M., and Elliott D. Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action. Hum. Mov. Sci. 24 (2005) 760-773
21. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain In Action (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
22. Predebon J. Manual-aiming bias and the Muller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information. Exp. Brain. Res. 163 (2005) 100-108
23. Rosenbaum D.A., Loukopoulos L.D., Meulenbroek R.G., Vaughan J., and Engelbrecht S.E. Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychol. Rev. 102 (1995) 28-67
24. Schmidt R.A., Zelaznik H., Hawkins B., Frank J.S., and Quinn Jr. J.T. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 86 (1979) 415-451
25. Schutz R.W., and Roy E.A. Absolute error: the devil in disguise. J. Mot. Behav. 5 (1973) 141-153
26. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. A new view of grasping. Mot. Control 3 (1999) 237-271
27. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. Action beyond our grasp. Trends Cog. Sci. 7 (2001) 287
28. Smeets J.B.J., Brenner E., de Grave D.D.J., and Cuijpers R.H. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Exp. Brain Res. 147 (2002) 135-144
29. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. Curved movement paths and the Hering illusion: positions or directions?. Vis. Cog. 11 (2004) 255-274
30. Westwood D.A., Heath M., and Roy E.A. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Exp. Brain Res. 134 (2000) 456-463