Sensory acceptability of menus and sweet snacks among children and adults from low- and medium-income households in Argentina

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 17, Issue 7-8, 2006, Pages 590-597

  Sosa, Miriam ^a   Hough, Guillermo ^a  

^a Instituto Superior Experimental de Tecnologia Alimentaria   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Age; Argentina; Income; Menu; Socio economic; Sweet snack

Indexed keywords

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33747661128     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aguirre P. Caracteristicas de las canastas de consumo de diferentes sectores de ingresos. In: Aguirre P. (Ed). Estrategias de consumo: qué comen los argentinos que comen (2005), Miño y Dávila, Argentina 67-106
2. Baxter I., Schröder M., and Bower J. The influence of socio-economic background on perceptions of vegetables among Scottish primary school children. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1999) 261-272
3. Baxter I., Schröder M., and Bower J. Children's perceptions of and preferences for vegetables in the west of Scotland: the role of demographic factors. Journal of Sensory Studies 15 (2000) 361-381
4. Edwards J., Meiselman H., Edwards A., and Lesher L. The influence of eating location on the acceptability of identically prepared foods. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 647-652
5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2004). Oficina Regional de la FAO para América Latina y el Caribe.
6. Forde C., and Delahunty C. Examination of chemical irritation and textural influence on food preferences in two age cohorts using complex food systems. Food Quality and Preference 13 (2002) 571-581
7. Grivetti L. Ethical and ethnical requirements in the production of food. Journal Food Science 69 (2004) CRH20-CRH28
8. Janssen W., Ashby J., Carlier M., and Castaño J. Targeting new technology at consumer food preferences in developing countries. Food Quality and Preference 3 (1991-1992) 175-182
9. Marshall D. British meals and food choice. In: Meiselman H. (Ed). Dimensions of the meal: the science, culture, business, and art of eating (2000), Aspen Publishers, Inc., USA 202-220
10. MDHT (2004). Available from http://www.mdhyt.gba.gov.ar/Programas/01_masvida/infosiempro.htm. Ministerio de Desarrollo Humano y Trabajo, Gobierno de la Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
11. Meiselman H.L., Johnson J.L., Reeve W., and Crouch J.E. Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite 35 (2000) 231-237
12. Oths K., Carolo A., and Dos Santos J. Social status and food preference in southern Brazil. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 42 (2003) 303-324
13. Rolls B.J. Sensory-specific satiety and variety in the meal. In: Meiselman H.L. (Ed). Dimensions of the meal - the science, culture, business, and art of eating (2000), Aspen Publication, Gaithersburg, Maryland 107-116
14. Scrimshaw N. The challenge of global malnutrition to the food industry. Food Technology 47 (1993) 60-71
15. Tuorila H., Andersson A., Martikainen A., and Salovaara H. Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference 9 (1998) 313-320