PERCEPTION of HUMANOID MOVEMENT

International Journal of Humanoid Robotics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 277-300

  Pollick, Frank E ^a,b   Hale, Joshua G ^b   Tzoneva Hadjigeorgieva, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cognition; Motion planning; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; EFFICIENCY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION;

COGNITION; GENERATION ALGORITHM; HUMAN MOTOR; HUMAN MOVEMENTS; HUMANOID ROBOT; MOTION GENERATION; MOTION-PLANNING; RAPID MOVEMENTS; VIRTUAL HUMANS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

MOTION PLANNING;

EID: 33747607124     PISSN: 02198436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S021984360500048X     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. W. Abend, E. Bizzi and P. Morasso, Human arm trajectory formation, Brain 105, 331-348 (1982).
2. C. Atkeson and J. Hollerbach, Kinematic features of unrestrained arm movements, J. Neurosci. 5, 2318-2330 (1985).
3. C. G. Atkeson, J. G. Hale, F. Pollick, M. Riley, S. Kotosaka, S. Schaal, T. Shibata, G. Tevatia, A. Ude, S. Vijayakumar and M. Kawato, Using humanoid robots to study human behavior, IEEE Intell. Syst. Mag. (Special Issue on Humanoids) 15(4), 46-56 (2000).
4. E. Bizzi, A. Polit and P. Morasso, Mechanisms underlying the achievement of final head position, J. Neurophysiol. 39, 434-444 (1976).
5. J. Davis and H. Gao, An expressive three-mode principal components model for gender recognition, J. Vision 4, 362-377 (2003).
6. W. Dittrich, T. Troscianko, S. Lea and D. Morgan, Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance, Perception 25, 727-738 (1996).
7. A. Feldman, Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture-iii. mechanographic analysis of the execution by man of the simplest motor tasks, Biophys. 11, 766-775 (1966).
8. T. Flash, Organizing principles underlying the formation of hand trajectories, Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard/MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 1983.
9. T. Flash, The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements, Biol. Cybern. 57, 257-274 (1987).
10. T. Flash and N. Hogan, The co-ordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model, J. Neurosci. 5, 1688-1703 (1985).
11. P. Haggard and J. Richardson, Spatial patterns in the control of human arm movement, J. Exp. Psychol. Human 22, 42-46 (1996).
12. J. G. Hale and F. E. Pollick, Biomimetic motion synthesis for the upper limb based on human motor production, in Workshop for Motor Control in Humans and Robots, Edinburgh University, 2002.
13. C. Harris and D. Wolpert, Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning, Nature 394, 780-784 (1998).
14. J. Harrison, R. Rensink and M. van de Panne, Obscuring length changes during animated motion, ACM Trans. Graphics 23(3), 569-573 (2004).
15. H. Hill and F. Pollick, Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays, Psychol. Sci. 11, 223-228 (2000).
16. J. Hodgins, J. O'Brien and J. Tumblin, Perception of human motion with different geometric models, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Gra. 4, 17-25 (1998).
17. N. Hogan, An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements, J. Neurosci. 4, 2745-2754 (1984).
18. J. Carroll and J. Chang, Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of the Eckart-Young decomposition, Psychometrika 35, 283-319 (1970).
19. G. Johansson, Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis, Percept. Psychophys. 14, 201-211 (1973).
20. L. Kozlowski and J. Cutting, Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic pointlight display, Percept. Psychophys. 21, 575-580 (1977).
21. J. Kruskal and M. Wish, Multidimensional Scaling, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-011 (Sage Publications, 1978).
22. M. Latash and G. Gottlieb, An equilibrium-point model for fast single-joint movement. I. Emergence of strategy-dependent EMG patterns, J. Motor Behav. 23, 163-178 (1991).
23. M. Oesker, H. Hecht and B. Jung, Psychological evidence for unconscious processing of detail in real-time animation of multiple characters, J. Vis. Comput. Animat. 11, 105-112 (2000).
24. F. Pollick, C. Fidopiastis and V. Braden, Recognizing the style of spatially exaggerated tennis serves, Perception 30, 323-338 (2001).
25. F. Pollick, H. Paterson, A. Bruderlin and A. Sanford, Perceiving affect from arm movements, Cognition 82, B51-B61 (2001).
26. P. Reitsma and N. Pollard, Perceptual metrics for character animation: Sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion, ACM Trans. Graphics 22(3), 537-542 (2003) [SIGGRAPH 2003].
27. M. Riley, A. Ude and C. G. Atkeson, Methods for motion generation and interaction with a humanoid robot: Case studies of dancing and catching, in Proc. AAAI and CMU Workshop on Interactive Robotics and Entertainment 2000, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2000.
28. C. Rose, B. Guenter, B. Bodenheimer and M. Cohen, Efficient generation of motion transitions using spacetime constraints, in SIGGRAPH 96, ACM Computer Graphics Proc., Annual Conference Series (Addison-Wesley, New Orleans, LA, 1996), pp. 147-154.
29. S. Runeson and G. Frykholm, Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition and deceptive intention, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 112, 585-615 (1983).
30. M. Shiffrar and J. Freyd, Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs, Psychol. Sci. 4, 379-384 (1993).
31. J. Soechting, F. Lacquaniti and C. Terzuolo, Coordinates of arm movements in threedimensional space, Neurosci. 17, 295-311 (1986).
32. G. Tevatia and S. Schaal, Inverse kinematics for humanoid robots, in IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2000), 2000.
33. I. Thornton and Q. Vuong, Incidental processing of biological motion, Curr. Biol. 14, 1084-1089 (2004).
34. N. Troje, Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns, J. Vis. 2, 371-387 (2002).
35. Y. Uno, M. Kawato and R. Suzuki, Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multi-joint arm movement minimum torque change model, Biol. Cybern. 61, 89-101 (1989).
36. Y. Uno, R. Suzuki and M. Kawato, Minimum muscle-tension change model which reproduces human arm movement, in Proc. 4th Symp. Biological and Physical Engineering (Japanese), pp. 229-302.
37. K. Verfaillie, Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion, J. Exp. Psychol. Human 19, 992-1023 (1993).
38. J. Wann, I. Nimmo-Smith and A. Wing, Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: Equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model, J. Exp. Psychol. Human 14, 622-637 (1988).
39. B. Winer, D. Brown and K. Michels, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 3rd edn. (McGraw-Hill, 1991).
40. D. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani and M. Jordan, Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements, Exp. Brain Res. 98, 153-156 (1994).