Obscuring length changes during animated motion

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 569-573

  Harrison, Jason ^a   Rensink, Ronald A ^a   Van De Panne, Michiel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Change detection; Computer animation; Length perception; Visual attention; Weber fraction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ANIMATION; COMPUTER VISION; COSTS; DATA REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; MOTION PLANNING; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CHANGE DETECTION; COMPUTER ANIMATION; LENGTH PERCEPTION; VISUAL ATTENTION; WEBER FRACTION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; ANIMATION;

EID: 12844281038     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1015706.1015761     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. CAVANAGH, P., LABIANCA, A. T., AND THORNTON, I. M. 2001. Attention-based visual routines: sprites. Cognition 80, 1-2, 47-60.
2. COREN, S., WARD, L. M., AND ENNS, J. T. 1994. Sensation and Perception, 4th ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
3. FRANCONERI, S. L., AND SIMONS, D. J. 2003. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychaphysics 65, 1, 999-1010.
4. GYSEN, V., DE GRAEF, P., AND VERFAILLIE, K. 2002. Detection of intrasaccadic displacements and depth rotations of moving objects. Vision Research 42, 379-391.
5. HE, S., CAVANAGH, P., AND INTRILIGATOR, J. 1997. Attentional resolution. Trends in Cognitive Science 1, 3 (June), 115-120.
6. HODGINS, J. K., O'BRIEN, J. F., AND TUMBLIN, J. 1998. Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 4, 4, 17-25.
7. HORVITZ, E., AND LENGYEL, J. 1997. Perception, attention, and resources: A decision-theoretic approach to graphics rendering. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Association for Uncertainty in AI (AUAI), 238-249.
8. KAERNBACH, C. 2001. Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks. Perception & Pyscholophysics 63, 8, 1377-1388.
9. KOVAR, L., SCHREINER, J., AND GLEICHER, M. 2002. Footskate cleanup for motion capture editing. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, ACM SIGGRAPH, 97-104.
10. MOORE, C. M., AND WOLFE, J. M. 2001. Getting beyond the serial/parallel debate in visual search: a hybrid approach. In The Limits of Attention: Temporal Constraints in human Information Processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ch. 9, 178-198. Kimron Shapiro (Ed.).
11. MOZER, M. C., AND SITTON, M. 1998. Computational modeling of spatial attention. In Attention, H. Paschler, Ed. London: UCL Press, 341-393.
12. OESKER, M., HECHT, H., AND JUNG, B. 2000. Psychological evidence for unconscious processing of detail in real-time animation of multiple characters. J. Visualization and Computer Animation 11, 105-112.
13. OLIVA, A., TORRALBA, A., CASTKLHANO, M. S., AND HENDERSON, J. M. 2003. Top-down control of visual attention in object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 1, 253-256.
14. O'SULLIVAN, C., AND DINOLIANA, J. 2001. Collisions and perception. ACM Transactions on Graphics 20, 3, 151-168.
15. O'SULLIVAN, C., DINGLIANA, J., GIANG, T., AND KAISER, M. K. 2003. Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, 527-526.
16. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., AND STORM, R. W. 1988. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision 3, 179-197.
17. REITSMA, P. S. A., AND POLLARD, N. 2003. Perceptual metrics for character animation: Sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH: New York, ACM SIGGRAPH, 537-542.
18. RENSINK, R. A. 2002. Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology 53, 245-277.
19. SEKULER, R., WATAMANIUK, S. N. J., AND BLAKE, R. 2002. Perception of visual motion. In Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 3rd ed., vol. 1. New York: Wiley, ch. 4.
20. SIMONS, D. J., AND CHABRIS, C. F. 1999. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28, 1059-1074.
21. SIMONS, D. J.. FRANCONERI, S. L., AND REIMER, R. L. 2000. Change blindness in the absence of visual disruption. Perception 29, 1143-1154.
22. TAYLOR, M. M. 1967. Pest: Efficient estimates on probability functions, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 41, 4, 782-787.
23. TOMAT, L., SCAMARDI, P., AND VICARIO, G. B. 1999. The perception of length changes in moving objects. Presented at ECVP'99.
24. VERSTRATEN, F. A., CAVANAGH, P., AND LABIANCA, A. T. 2000. Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research 40, 3651-3664.