Design issues related to the evaluation of learner-computer interaction in a web-based environment: Activities v. tasks

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 19, Issue 2-3, 2006, Pages 261-276

  Hémard, Dominique ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747595680     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220600821586     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. ACM SIGCHI. (1992). Curriculum for human-computer interaction. ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction Curriculum Development Group, New York.
2. Allen, R. B. (1997). Mental models and user models. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 49-65). North-Holland: Elsevier.
3. Bainbridge, L. (1990). Verbal protocol analysis. In J. R. Wilson, & E. N. Corlett (Eds.), Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology (pp. 161-179). London: Taylor & Francis.
4. Bertelsen, O., & Bødker, S. (2003). Activity theory. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.) HCI models, theories and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science (pp. 291-324). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
5. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.) Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Diaper, D., & Stanton, N. (Eds.). (2004). The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Dowell, J., & Long, J. (1989). Towards a conception for an engineering discipline of human factors. Ergonomics, 32, 1513-1535.
9. Fischer, P. M., & Mandl, H. (1989). Towards a psychophysics of hypermedia. In D. H. Jonassen, & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Gugerty, L. (1993). The use of analytical models in human-computer interface design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 625-660.
11. Hémard, D. (1997). Design principles and guidelines for authoring hypermedia language learning applications. System, 25(1), 9-27.
12. Hémard, D. (1998). Knowledge representations in hypermedia CALL authoring: Conception and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(3), 247-264.
13. Hémard, D. (1999). A methodology for designing student-centred hypermedia CALL. In R. Debski, & M. Levy (Eds.), WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14. Hémard, D. (2003). Language learning online: Designing towards user acceptability. In U. Felix (Ed.) Language learning online: Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
15. Hémard, D. (2004). Enhancing online CALL design: The case for evaluation. ReCALL, 16(2), 502-519.
16. Hémard, D. (in press). Evaluating hypermedia structures as a means of improving language learning strategies and motivation.
17. Hémard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). From access to acceptability: Exploiting the web to design a new CALL environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 1-16.
18. Hémard, D., & Cushion, S. (2001). Evaluation of a web-based language learning environment: the importance of a user-centred design approach for CALL. ReCALL, 13(1), 129-142.
19. Jonassen, D. H., & Mandl, H. (Eds.). (1989). Designing hypermedia for learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.). Context and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., & Macaulay, C. (1999). The activity checklist: A tool for representing the «space» of context. Interactions, 6(4), 27-39.
22. Karat, J. (1997). User-centered software evaluation methodologies. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.). Handbook of Human-Computer interaction (pp. 689-704). North-Holland: Elsevier.
23. Kieras, D. (2004). GOMS models for task analysis. In S. Diaper, & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Landow, G. P. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
26. Laurillard, D. (2003). Foreword. In U. Felix (Ed.) Language learning online: Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
27. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning-context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. McAleese, R., & Green, C. (Eds.). (1990). Hypertext: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect.
30. McAleese, R. (Ed.). (1999). Hypertext: Theory into practice. Oxford: Intellect.
31. McKnight C., Dillon, A., & Richardson, J. (Eds.). (1993). Hypertext: A psychological perspective. Chichester: Horwood Publishing Limited.
32. Nardi, B. A. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Nielsen, J. (1990). Hypertext and hypermedia. San Diego: Academic Press.
34. Nielsen, J. (1995). Multimedia and hypertext. The internet and beyond. Boston: AP Professional.
35. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
36. Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman, & S. W. Diaper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 87-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 741-773.
38. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
39. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
40. Turner, P., & McEwan, T. (2004). Activity theory: Another perspective on task analysis. In D. Diaper, & N. Stanton (Eds.) The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Veen, J. (2000). The art and science of web design. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.) The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 134-143). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.