Enhancing online CALL design: The case for evaluation

ReCALL

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 502-519

  Hémard, Dominique ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747601065     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344004001727     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allen, R. B. (1997) Mental models and user models. In: Helander, M. G., Landauer, T. K. and Prabhu, P. V. (eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland: Elsevier, 49-65.
2. Arneil, S. and Holmes, M. (2003) Servers, clients, testing and teaching. In: Felix, U. (ed.), Language Learning Online: Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 59-80.
3. Bainbridge, L. (1990) Verbal protocol analysis. In: Wilson, J. R. and Corlett, E. N. (eds.), Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology. London: Taylor & Francis, 161-179.
4. Boyle, T. (1997) Design for Multimedia Learning. London: Prentice Hall.
5. Cushion, S. and Hémard, D. (2003) Designing a CALL package for Arabic while learning the language ab initio. Computer Assisted Language Learning, in press.
6. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. and Beale, R. (1998) Human-Computer Interaction. London: Prentice-Hall.
7. Dumas, J. S. and Redish, J. C. (1999) A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Exeter: Intellect Books.
8. Godwin-Jones, R. (2003) Optimising web course design for language learners. In: Felix, U. (ed.), Language Learning Online: Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 43-56.
9. Goodyear, P., Asensio, M., Jones, C., Hodgson, V. and Steeples, C. (2003) Relationships between conceptions of learning, approaches to study and students' judgements about the value of their experiences of networked learning. ALT-J, 11(1): 17-27.
10. Hémard, D. (1999) A methodology for designing student-centred hypermedia CALL. In: Debski, R. and Levy, M. (eds.), WorldCALL: Global Perspectives on Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 215-228.
11. Hémard, D. (2003) Language Learning Online: designing towards user acceptability. In: Felix, U. (ed.), Language Learning Online: Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 21-43.
12. Hémard, D. and Cushion, S. (2000a) Authoring a web-enhanced interface for a new languagelearning environment. ALT-J, 8(1): 41-49.
13. Hémard, D. and Cushion, S. (2000b) From access to acceptability: exploiting the web to design a new CALL environment. CALL 13(2): 1-16.
14. Hémard, D. and Cushion, S. (2001) Evaluation of a web-based language learning environment: the importance of a user-centred design approach for CALL. ReCALL, 13(1): 129-142.
15. Hémard, D. and Cushion, S. (2002) Sound authoring on the web: meeting the users'needs. CALL 15(3): 281-295.
16. Hémard, D. and Cushion, S. (2003) Design and evaluation of an online test: assessment conceived as a complementary CALL tool. CALL in press.
17. Jones, A., Scanlon, E., Tosunoglu, C., Morris, E., Ross, S., Butcher, P. and Greenberg, J. (1999) Contexts for evaluating educational software. Interacting with Comput. 11: 499-516
18. Karat, J. (1997) User-centered software svaluation methodologies. In: Helander, M. G., Landauer, T. K. and Prabhu, P. V. (eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland: Elsevier, 689-704.
19. Levy, M. (1997) Computer-Assisted Language Learning - Context and Conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Levy, M. (1999) Design processes in CALL: integrating theory, research and evaluation. In: Cameron, K. (ed.), Media Design and Applications. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 83-107.
21. Lewis, C. and Wharton, C. (1997) Cognitive walkthroughs. In: Helander, M. G., Landauer, T. K. and Prabhu, P. V. (eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland: Elsevier, 717-733.
22. Nielsen, J. (2000) Designing Web Usability. Indianapolis, USA: New Riders Publishing.
23. Nielsen, J. (2001) Ten Usability Heuristics. http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic.
24. Norman, D. (1988) The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
25. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. and Carey, T. (1994) Human-Computer Interaction. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
26. Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H. (2002) Interaction Design: Beyond human-computer interaction. New York: Wiley.
27. Ravden, S. and Johnson, G. (1989) Evaluating Usability of Human-Computer Interfaces. A Practical Method. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
28. Shneiderman, B. (1998) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
29. Squires, D. (1999) Usability and educational software design. Special Issue. Interacting with Computers 11: 463-466.
30. Squires, D. and Preece, J. (1999) Predicting quality in educational software: evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interacting with Computers 11: 467-483.