Composition, securement, and concede-and-divide

Spanish Economic Review

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 227-237

  Moreno Ternero, Juan D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Characterization result; Claims problems; Composition; Concede and divide; Securement

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747503552     PISSN: 14355469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10108-006-9003-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aumann RJ, Maschler M (1985) Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J Econ Theory 36:195-213
2. Bergantiños G, Méndez-Naya L (2001) Additivity in bankruptcy problems and in allocation problems. Span Econ Rev 3: 223-229
3. Dagan N (1996) New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules. Soc Choice Welfare 13: 51-59
4. Dominguez D, Thomson W (2006) A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. Econ Theory 28: 283-307
5. Herrero C, Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Math Soc Sci 42: 307-328
6. Ju BG, Moreno-Ternero JD (2005) Progressivity, inequality reduction and merging-proofness in taxation. Mimeo, University of Kansas, Kansas
7. Moreno-Ternero JD, Villar A (2004) The talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards. Math Soc Sci 47:245-257
8. Moreno-Ternero JD, Villar A (2005) New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule. Review of Econ Des (in press)
9. Moreno-Ternero JD, Villar A (2006) The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems. Soc Choice Welfare (in press)
10. Moulin H (1987) Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods. Int J Game Theory 16:161-186
11. Moulin H (2000) Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods. Econometrica 68: 643-684
12. Moulin H (2002) Axiomatic cost and surplus-sharing. In: Arrow K, Sen A, Suzumura K (Eds.) The handbook of social choice and self are, vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 289-357
13. O'Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math Soc Sci 2: 345-371
14. Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45: 249-297
15. Thomson W (2004) How to divide when there isn't enough: from the Talmud to modern game theory. Book Manuscript, University of Rochester, Rochester
16. Yeh C-H (2006) Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems. Mimeo, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
17. Young P (1988) Distributive justice in taxation. J Econ Theory 44: 321-335
18. Young P (1994) Equity. Princeton University Press, Princeton