Testing the directionality of evolution: The case of chydorid crustaceans

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1517-1530

  Adamowicz, S J ^a   Sacherova V ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Arthropoda; Character evolution; Chydorids; Correlated evolution; Crustacea; Evolutionary trend; Limb evolution

Indexed keywords

CRUSTACEAN; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLADOCERA; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; LIMB; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CLADOCERA; EXTREMITIES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALIA; ARTHROPODA; CHYDORIDAE; CRUSTACEA;

EID: 33747383945     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01127.x     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adamowicz, S.J., Menu-Marque, S., Hebert, P.D.N. & Purvis, A. Molecular systematics and patterns of morphological evolution in the Centropagidae (Copepoda: Calanoida) of Argentina. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. in press.
2. Alroy, J. 1998. Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Science 280: 731-734.
3. Alroy, J. 2000. Understanding the dynamics of trends within evolving lineages. Paleobiology 26: 319-329.
4. Arnold, A.J., Kelly, D.C. & Parker, W.C. 1995. Causality and Cope's rule - evidence from the planktonic foraminifera. J. Paleontol. 69: 203-210.
5. Boxshall, G. 2001. Arthropod evolution and the origin of the Crustacea: a history in three parts. Plenary Lecture at the 5th International Crustacean Congress. 9-13th July, Melbourne, AUS. available at http://www.vims.edu/tcs/ ICC5_abstracts. htm (accessed 26 March 2005).
6. Boxshall, G.A. 2004. The evolution of arthropod limbs. Biol. Rev. 79: 253-300.
7. Brooks, D.R. & McLennan, D.A. 1993. Macroevolutionary patterns of morphological diversification among parasitic flatworms (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria). Evolution 47: 495-509.
8. Cisne, J.L. 1982. Origin of the Crustacea. In: Systematics, the Fossil Record, and Biogeography (L. G. Abele, ed.), pp. 65-92. Academic Press, New York.
9. Cunningham, C.W., Omland, K.E. & Oakley, T.H. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical appraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 361-366.
10. Cunningham, C.W. 1999. Some limitations of ancestral character-state reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 48: 665-674.
11. Dogiel, V.A. 1954. Oligomerization of the Homologous Organs as One of the Main Paths in Animal Evolution. Leningrad University Press, Leningrad (in Russian).
12. Dumont, H.J. & Negrea, S.V. 2002. Introduction to the Class Branchiopoda. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
13. Dumont, H.J. & Silva-Briano, M. 1998. A reclassification of the anomopod families Macrothricidae and Chydoridae, with the creation of a new suborder, the Radopoda (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). Hydrobiologia 384: 119-149.
14. Frey, D.G. 1959. The taxonomic and phylogenetic significance of the head pores of the Chydoridae (Cladocera). Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 44: 27-50.
15. Fryer, G. 1968. Evolution and adaptive radiation in the Chydoridae Crustacea. Cladocera: a study in comparative functional morphology and ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 254B: 221-385.
16. Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 36: 182-198.
17. Gould, S.J. 1996. Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. Harmony Books, New York.
18. Gould, S.J. 1997. Cope's rule as psychological artefact. Nature 385: 199-200.
19. Halanych, K.M. 2004. The new view of animal phylogeny. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 229-256.
20. Hann, B.J. 1982. Two new species of Eurycercus (Bullatifrons) from Eastern North America (Chydoridae, Cladocera). Taxonomy, Ontogeny, and Biology. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 67: 585-610.
21. Hessler, R.R., Marcotte, B.M., Newman, W.A. & Maddocks, R.F. 1982. Evolution within the Crustacea. In: Systematics, the Fossil Record, and Biogeography (L. G. Abele, ed.), pp. 149-239. Academic Press, New York.
22. Hibbett, D.S. & Binder, M. 2002. Evolution of complex fruiting-body morphologies in homobasidiomycetes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1963-1969.
23. Hibbett, D.S. 2004. Trends in morphological evolution in homobasidiomycetes inferred using maximum likelihood: a comparison of binary and multistate approaches. Syst. Biol. 53: 889-903.
24. Ho, J.S. 1994. Copepod phylogeny: a reconsideration of Huys and Boxshall's 'parsimony versus homology'. Hydrobiologia 292/293: 31-39.
25. Hone, D.W.E., Keesey, T.M., Pisani, D. & Purvis, A. 2005. Macroevolutionary trends in the Dinosauria: Cope's Rule. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 587-595.
26. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Crandall, K.A. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 437-466.
27. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
28. Huys, R. & Boxshall, G. 1991. Copepod Evolution. The Ray Society, London, UK.
29. Jablonski, D. 1997. Body-size evolution in Cretaceous molluscs and the status of Cope's rule. Nature 385: 250-252.
30. Jockusch, E.L., Williams, T.A. & Nagy, L.M. 2004. The evolution of patterning of serially homologous appendages in insects. Dev. Genes. Evol. 214: 324-338.
31. Kabata, Z. (ed.) 1986. Discussion. Syllogeus 58: 197-208.
32. Keightley, P.D. & Ohnishi, O. 1998. EMS-induced mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148: 753-766.
33. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2004a. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.05. (Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org) . Accessed 15 September 2005.
34. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2004b. StochChar: A package of Mesquite modules for stochastic models of character evolution. Version 1.05. Available as part of Mesquite package at: http://mesquiteproject.org.
35. McShea, D.W. 1994. Mechanisms of large-scale evolutionary trends. Evolution 48: 1747-1763.
36. McShea, D.W. 1996. Metazoan complexity and evolution: is there a trend? Evolution 50: 477-492.
37. Menu-Marque, S. 2002. Karukinka fueguina n. gen., n. sp. (Copepoda, Calanoida, Centropagidae) from Tierra del Fuego. Crustaceana 75: 1229-1240.
38. Menu-Marque, S. & Balseiro, E. 2000. Boeckella antiqua n. sp. (Copepoda, Calanoida, Centropagidae) from Patagonia. Hydrobiologia 429: 1-7.
39. Monchenko, V.I. & von Vaupel Klein, J.C. 1999. Oligomerization in Copepoda Cyclopoida as a kind of orthogenetic evolution in the animal kingdom. Crustaceana 72: 241-264.
40. Mooers, A.Ø. & Schluter, D. 1999. Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum likelihood: support for one- and two-rate models. Syst. Biol. 48: 623-633.
41. Nosil, P. 2002. Transition rates between specialization and generalization in phytophagous insects. Evolution 56: 1701-1706.
42. Nosil, P. & Mooers, A.Ø. 2005. Testing hypotheses about ecological specialization using phylogenetic trees. Evolution 59: 2256-2263.
43. Oakley, T.H. 2003. Maximum likelihood models of character trait evolution. Comment Theor. Biol. 8: 1-17.
44. Oakley, T.H. & Cunningham, C.W. 2002. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the independent evolutionary origin of an arthropod compound eye. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 1426-1430.
45. Olesen, J. 1996. External morphology and phylogenetic significance of the dorsal/neck organ in the Conchostraca and the head pores of the cladoceran family Chydoridae (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). Hydrobiologia 330: 213-226.
46. Omland, K.E. 1997. Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: repeated loss of dichromatism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution 51: 1636-1646.
47. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255: 37-45.
48. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character state of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48: 612-622.
49. Pagel, M. 2003. Multistate, Version 0.8. A computer program distributed by the author (Available at: http://www.ams.rdg.ac.uk/zoology/pagel/).
50. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Model test: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
51. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50: 580-601.
52. Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analyzing comparative data. Cabios 11: 247-251.
53. Remigio, E.A., Hebert, P.D.N. & Savage, A. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships and remarkable radiation in Parartemia (Crustacea: Anostraca), the endemic brine shrimp of Australia: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74: 59-71.
54. Sacherová, V. & Hebert, P.D.N. 2003. The evolutionary history of the Chydoridae (Crustacea: Cladocera). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79: 629-643.
55. Sanders, H.L. 1957. The Cephalocarida and crustacean phylogeny. Syst. Zool. 6: 112-128+148.
56. Sanders, H.L. 1963. The Cephalocarida. functional morphology, larval development, and comparative external anatomy. Mem. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 15: 1-80.
57. Sanderson, M.J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 101-109.
58. Sanderson, M.J. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19: 301-302.
59. Saunders, W.B., Work, D.M. & Nikolaeva, S.V. 1999. Evolution of complexity in Paleozoic ammonoid sutures. Science 286: 760-763.
60. Schluter, D., Price, T., Mooers, A.Ø. & Ludwig, D. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 1699-1711.
61. Schram, F.R. 1982. The fossil record and evolution of Crustacea. In: The Biology of Crustacea (L. G. Abele, ed.), Vol. I. Systematics, the Fossil Record, and Biogeography. Academic Press, New York.
62. Schram, F.R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
63. Schram, F.R. & Koenemann, S. 2004. Are the crustaceans monophyletic? In: Assembling the Tree of Life (J. Cracraft & M. J. Donoghue, eds), pp. 319-329. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
64. Sidor, C.A. 2001. Simplification as a trend in synapsid cranial evolution. Evolution 55: 1419-1442.
65. Smirnov, N.N. 1968. On comparative functional morphology of limbs of Chydoridae (Cladocera). Crustaceana 14: 76-96.
66. Smirnov, N.N. 1969. Morpho-functional grounds of mode of life of Cladocera. III. Oligomerization in Cladocera. Hydrobiologia 34: 235-242.
67. Smirnov, N.N. 1971. Chydoridae fauny mira. Fauna SSSR 1, 2 (n.s. 101), Leningrad, USSR, p. 531.
68. (English translation by A. Mercado: Chydoridae. Fauna of the USSR Crustacea. Vol. 1. No. 2. Keter Publishing House Jerusalem Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel, 1974, p. 644).
69. Smirnov, N.N. 1996. Cladocera: the Chydorinae and Sayciinae (Chydoridae) of the World. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.
70. Stanley, S.M. 1973. An explanation for Cope's rule. Evolution 27: 1-26.
71. von Vaupel Klein, J.C. 1998. Interpretation of character phylogenies in calanoid copepods by implementing Dollo's law. J. Crust. Biol. 18: 153-160.
72. Webster, A.J. & Purvis, A. 2002. Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 143-149.
73. Weekers, P.H.H., Murugan, G., Vanfleteren, J.R., Belk, D. & Dumont, H.J. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) inferred from nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25: 535-544.
74. Williams, T.A. & Nagy, L.M. 2001. Developmental modularity and the evolutionary diversification of arthropod limbs. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 291: 241-257.
75. Yampolsky, L.Y. & Stoltzfus, A. 2001. Bias in the introduction of variation as an orienting factor in evolution. Evol. Dev. 3: 73-83.
76. Yang, H.-P., Tanikawa, A.Y., Van Voorhies, W.A., Silva, J.C. & Kondrashov, A.S. 2001. Whole-genome effects of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation on nine quantitative traits in outbred Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 157: 1257-1265.