Cemented femoral stem performance: Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 355, Issue , 1998, Pages 57-69

  Chang, Paul B ^b   Mann, Kenneth A ^a   Bartel, Donald L ^b  

^a and Radiation Oncology   (United States)

^b Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

CONFERENCE PAPER; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMUR NECK; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 0031765525     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Balu GR, Noble PC, Alexander JW, Vela VL: The effect of intramedullary reaming on the strength of the cement/bone interface. Trans Orthop Res Soc 19:797, 1994.
2. Bean DJ, Convery FR, Woo SLY, Lieber RL: Regional variations in shear strength of the bone-polymethylmethacrylate interface. J Arthroplasty 2:293-298, 1987.
3. Barrack RL, Mulroy Jr RD, Harris WH: Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasties: A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 74B:385-389, 1992.
4. Bugbee WD, Barrera DL, Lee AC, Convery FR: Variations in shear strength of the bone-cement interface in the proximal femur. Trans Orthop Res Soc 17:22, 1992.
5. Chinchalkar S, Taylor DL: Loading and Material property uncertainties in finite element analysis for orthopaedics. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Conference on the Design of Experiments in Army Research Development and Testing. Monterey, CA. Army Research Office Report 90-2, 91-102, 1989.
6. Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC: An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 62A:68-78, 1980.
7. Crowninshield RD, Tolbert JR: Cement strain measurement surrounding loose and well-fixed femoral component stems. J Bone Miner Res 17:819-828, 1983.
8. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE: Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 236:214-240, 1988.
9. Gardiner RC, Hozack WJ: Failure of the cement-bone interface: A consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface? J Bone Joint Surg 76B:49-52, 1994.
10. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17-27, 1979.
11. Harrigan TP, Harris WH: A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. J Biomech 24:1047-1058, 1991.
12. Harris WH: Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements? Clin Orthop 285:67-72, 1992.
13. Harris WH, McCarthy Jr JC, O'Neill DA: Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:1063-1067, 1982.
14. Harris WH, McGann WA: Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cement-ing technique: Follow-up note with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:1064-1066, 1986.
15. Keaveny TM, Bartel DL: Effects of porous coating and collar support on early load transfer for a cementless hip prosthesis. J Biomech 26:1205-1216, 1993.
16. Keaveny TM, Bartel DL: Fundamental load transfer patterns for press-fit, surface-treated intramedullary fixation stems. J Biomech 27:1147-1158, 1994.
17. Kobel R, Bergmann G, Boenick U: Mechanical Engineering of the Cement-Bone Bond. In Schldach M. Hohman D (eds). Engineering in Medicine. New York, Springer 347-357, 1976.
18. Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J: Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop 163:290-299, 1982.
19. Krause WR, Mathis RS: Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: Review of the literature. J Biomed Res 22:37-53, 1988.
20. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L: Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 64:497-506, 1993.
21. Mann KA: Loosening of cemented femoral hip components and the role of the stem-cement and bone-cement interfaces. PhD Dissertation. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University, 69-118, 1991.
22. Mann KA, Ayers DC, Werner FW: Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension. Trans Orthop Res Soc 23:764, 1998.
23. Mann KA, Ayers DC, Werner FW, Nicoletta RJ, Fortino MD: Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitization with PMMA cement. J Biomech 30:339-346, 1997.
24. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Ayers DC: Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond. J Orthop Res 15:700-706, 1997
25. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM, Burstein AH: Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: A more realistic model. J Biomech 28:1067-1078, 1995.
26. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, Johnston RC: Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1315-22, 1995.
27. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM: The anatomical basis for femoral component design. J Orthop Res 235:148-165, 1988.
28. Paul JP: Forces transmitted by joints in the human body. Proc Inst Mech Eng 181:8-15, 1967.
29. Ross PJ: Parameter and Tolerance Design in Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. In Sun B, Gleason D (eds). Loss Function, Orthogonal Experiments. Parameter and Tolerance Design. Ed 1. New York, McGraw-Hill 167-205, 1988.
30. Russotti GM, Coventry MB, Stauffer RN: Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-vear minimum follow-up study. Clin Orthop 235:141-147, 1988.
31. Shulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelly SS, Johnston RC: The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg 75A:961-975, 1993.
32. Stauffer RN: Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement with particular reference to roentgenographic loosening of the components. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:983-990, 1982.
33. Stone MH, Wilkinson R, Stother IG: Some factors affecting the strength of the cement-metal interface. J Bone Joint Surg 71B:217-221, 1989.
34. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE: A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:970-982, 1982.
35. Taguchi G: Introduction to Quality Engineering. Designing Quality into Products and Processes. Asian Productivity Organization. White Plains, NY, Krauss International Publications, 1986.
36. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R: Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 329:326-336, 1996.
37. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R: Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:665-666, 1997.