Demography of central and marginal populations of monkeyflowers (Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii)

Ecology

Volumn 87, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 2014-2025

  Angert, Amy Lauren ^a,b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Life table response experiment; LTRE; Matrix population models; Mimulus cardinalis; Mimulus lewisii; Monkeyflower; Population dynamics; Range limit

Indexed keywords

LIFE TABLE; PLANT COMMUNITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODELING; RANGE SIZE; SPATIAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

MIMULUS CARDINALIS; MIMULUS LEWISII;

EID: 33747069966     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 00129658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2014:DOCAMP]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Angert, A. L. 2005. The ecology and evolution of elevation range limits in monkeyflowers. Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
2. Angert, A. L. In press. Growth and leaf physiology of monkeyflowers with different altitude ranges. Oecologia.
3. Angert, A. L., and D. W. Schemske. 2005. The evolution of species' distributions: reciprocal transplants across the elevation ranges of Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii. Evolution 59:222-235.
4. Antonovics, J. 1976. The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63:224-247.
5. Beardsley, P. M., A. Yen, and R. G. Olmstead. 2003. AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57:1397-1410.
6. Brown, J. H., G. C. Stevens, and D. M. Kaufman. 1996. The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:597-623.
7. Brys, R., H. Jacquemyn, P. Endels, G. De Blust, and M. Hermy. 2004. The effects of grassland management on plant performance and demography in the perennial herb Primula veris. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:1080-1091.
8. Carter, R. N., and S. D. Prince. 1981. Epidemic models used to explain biogeographical distribution limits. Nature 293:644-645.
9. Carter, R. N., and S. D. Prince. 1988. Distribution limits from a demographic viewpoint. Pages 165-184 in A. J. Davy, M. J. Hutchings, and A. R. Watkinson, editors. Plant population ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
10. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Second edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
11. Charlesworth, B. 1980. Evolution in age structured populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
12. Curnutt, J. L., S. L. Pimm, and B. A. Maurer. 1996. Population variability of sparrows in space and time. Oikos 76:131-144.
13. Dorken, M. E., and C. G. Eckert. 2001. Severely reduced sexual reproduction in northern populations of a clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Journal of Ecology 89:339-350.
14. Edgington, E. S. 1995. Randomization tests. Third edition. Marcel Dekker, New York, New York, USA.
15. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
16. Fréville, H., B. Colas, M. Riba, H. Caswell, A. Mignot, E. Imbert, and I. Olivieri. 2004. Spatial and temporal demographic variability in the endemic plant species Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Ecology 85:694-703.
17. Gaston, K. J. 1990. Patterns in the geographical ranges of species. Biological Review 65:105-129.
18. Guo, Q. F., M. Taper, M. Schoenberger, and J. Brandle. 2005. Spatial-temporal population dynamics across species range: from centre to margin. Oikos 108:47-57.
19. Hickman, J. C., editor. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
20. Hiesey, W. M., M. A. Nobs, and O. Björkman. 1971. Experimental studies on the nature of species. V. Biosystematics, genetics, and physiological ecology of the Erythranthe section of Mimulus. Carnegie Institute of Washington publication number 628, Washington, D.C., USA.
21. Holt, R. D., and T. H. Keitt. 2000. Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective. Ecology Letters 3:41-47.
22. Holt, R. D., and T. H. Keitt. 2005. Species' borders: a unifying theme in ecology. Oikos 108:3-6.
23. Horvitz, C. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1995. Spatiotemporal variation in demographic transitions of a tropical understory herb: projection matrix analysis. Ecological Monographs 65:155-192.
24. Ives, A. R., and E. D. Klopfer. 1997. Spatial variation in abundance created by stochastic temporal variation. Ecology 78:1907-1913.
25. Juenger, T., and J. Bergelson. 2000. The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764-777.
26. Jump, A. S., and F. I. Woodward. 2003. Seed production and population density decline approaching the range-edge of Cirsium species. New Phytologist 160:349-358.
27. Kawecki, T. J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evolutionary Ecology 9:38-44.
28. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. Evolution of a species range. American Naturalist 150:1-23.
29. Lennon, J. J., J. R. G. Turner, and D. Connell. 1997. A metapopulation model of species boundaries. Oikos 78:486-502.
30. Lesica, P., and F. W. Allendorf. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology 9:753-760.
31. Lytle, D. A., and D. M. Merritt. 2004. Hydrologic regimes and riparian forests: a structured population model for cottonwood. Ecology 85:2493-2503.
32. Maron, J. L., and E. L. Simms. 2001. Rodent-limited establishment of bush lupine: field experiments on the cumulative effect of granivory. Journal of Ecology 89:578-588.
33. Marshall, J. K. 1968. Factors limiting the survival of Corynephorus canescens (L.) Beauv. in Great Britain at the northern edge of its distribution. Oikos 19:206-216.
34. Matlab. 2001. Version 6.1. MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
35. Maurer, B. A., and M. L. Taper. 2002. Connecting geographical distributions with population processes. Ecology Letters 5:223-231.
36. McClure, M. S., and P. W. Price. 1976. Ecotope characteristics of coexisting Erythroneura leafhoppers (Homoptera; Cicadellidae) on sycamore. Ecology 57:928-940.
37. Mehlman, D. W. 1997. Change in avian abundance across the geographic range in response to environmental change. Ecological Applications 7:614-624.
38. Menges, E. S. 1990. Population viability analysis for an endangered plant. Conservation Biology 4:52-62.
39. Menges, E. S., and R. W. Dolan. 1998. Demographic viability of populations of Silene regia in midwestern prairies: relationships with fire management, genetic variation, geographic location, population size, and isolation. Journal of Ecology 86:63-78.
40. Miriti, M. N., S. J. Wright, and H. F. Howe. 2001. The effects of neighbors on the demography of a dominant desert shrub (Ambrosia dumosa). Ecological Monographs 71:491-509.
41. Moran, M. D. 2003. Arguments for rejection of the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403-405.
42. Nantel, P., and D. Gagnon. 1999. Variability in the dynamics of northern peripheral versus southern populations of two clonal plant species, Helianthus divaricatus and Rhus aromatica. Journal of Ecology 87:748-760.
43. Olmsted, I., H. Dunevitz, and W. J. Platt. 1993. Effects of freezes on tropical trees in Everglades National Park, Florida, USA. Tropical Ecology 34:17-34.
44. Perez-Tris, J., R. Carbonell, and J. L. Telleria. 2000. Abundance distribution, morphological variation and juvenile condition of robins, Erithacus rubecula (L.), in their Mediterranean range boundary. Journal of Biogeography 27:879-888.
45. Pigott, C. D., and J. P. Huntley. 1981. Factors controlling the distribution of Tilia cordata at the northern limits of its geographical range. III. Nature and causes of seed sterility. New Phytologist 87:817-839.
46. Prince, S. D., and R. N. Carter. 1985. The geographical distribution of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) III. Its performance in transplant sites beyond its distribution limit in Britain. Journal of Ecology 73:49-64.
47. Pulliam, H. R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3:349-361.
48. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
49. Sagarin, R. D., and S. D. Gaines. 2002. The 'abundant centre' distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecology Letters 5:137-147.
50. SAS. 2001a. PROC CATMOD. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
51. SAS. 2001b. PROC MIXED. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
52. SAS. 2003. PROC GLIMMIX. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
53. Satterthwaite, F. W. 1946. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin 2:110-114.
54. Stokes, K. E., J. M. Bullock, and A. R. Watkinson. 2004. Population dynamics across a parapatric range boundary: Ulex gallii and Ulex minor. Journal of Ecology 92:142-155.
55. Turnbull, L. A., M. J. Crawley, and M. Rees. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225-228.
56. Volis, S., S. Mendlinger, and D. Ward. 2004. Demography and role of the seed bank in Mediterranean and desert populations of wild barley. Basic and Applied Ecology 5:53-64.
57. Waser, N. M., R. K. J. Vickery, and M. V. Price. 1982. Patterns of seed dispersal and population differentiation in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 36:753-761.
58. Williams, C. K., A. R. Ives, and R. D. Applegate. 2003. Population dynamics across geographical ranges: time-series analyses of three small game species. Ecology 84:2654-2667.