A model of the evolution of dichogamy incorporating sex-ratio selection, anther-stigma interference, and inbreeding depression

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 934-944

  Sargent, Risa D ^a,b   Mandegar, Mohammad A ^a   Otto, Sarah P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anther stigma interference; Dichogamy; Inbreeding depression; Pollen discounting; Population genetic model; Self fertilization

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; AUTOGAMY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; POLLEN; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; PLANT; PLANT SEED; SEX RATIO;

EVOLUTION; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS; SEEDS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX RATIO;

EID: 33747063079     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-389.1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aizen, M. A., and A. Basilio. 1995. Within and among flower sex-phase distribution Alstroemeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae). Can. J. Bot. 73:1986-1994.
2. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Genet. 3:274-284.
3. _. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philos. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 358:991-1004.
4. Bertin, R. I. 1993. Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 80:557-560.
5. Bertin, R. I., and C. M. Newman. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 59:112-152.
6. Brunet, J. 1996. Male reproductive success and variation in fruit and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Ecology 77:2458-2471.
7. Brunet, J., and D. Charlesworth. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants: Evolution 49:70-79.
8. Cesaro, A. C., S. C. H. Barrett, S. Maurice, B. E. Vaissiere, and J. D. Thompson. 2004. An experimental evaluation of self-interference in Narcissus assoanus: functional and evolutionary implications. J. Evol. Biol. 17:1367-1376.
9. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. Camb. 74:329-340.
10. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
11. Darwin, C. 1876. The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. Murray, London.
12. Dudash, M. R., and C. B. Fenster. 2001. The role of breeding system and inbreeding depression in the maintenance of an outcrossing mating strategy in Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88:1953-1959.
13. Fetscher, A. E. 2001. Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:525-529.
14. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover, New York.
15. _. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11:53-63.
16. Goodwillie, C., S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36:47-79.
17. Harder, L. D., and M. A. Aizen. 2004. The functional significance of synchronous protandry in Alstroemeria aurea. Funct. Ecol. 18:467-474.
18. Harder, L. D., and W. G. Wilson. 1998. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. Am. Nat. 152:684-695.
19. Harder, L. D., S. C. H. Barrett, and W. W. Cole. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:315-320.
20. Herlihy, C. R., and C. G. Eckert. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416:320-323.
21. Holsinger, K. E. 1991. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:307-308.
22. Holsinger, K. E., M. W. Feldman, and F. B. Christianson. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model. Am. Nat. 124:446-453.
23. Hossaert-McKey, M., and J. L. Bronstein. 2001. Self-pollination and its costs in a monoecious fig (Ficus aurea, Moraceae) in a highly seasonal subtropical environment. Am. J. Bot. 88:685-692.
24. Huang, S.-Q., L.-L. Tang, Q. Yu, and Y.-H. Guo. 2004. Temporal floral sex allocation in protogynous Aquilegia yabeana contrasts with protandrous species: support for the mating environment hypothesis. Evolution 58:1131-1134.
25. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
26. Kalisz, S., D. W. Vogler, and K. M. Hanley. 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430:884-887.
27. Kohn, J. R., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1992. Floral manipulations reveal the cause of male fitness variation in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Funct. Ecol. 6:590-595.
28. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
29. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113:67-79.
30. _. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 153:370-380.
31. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. 1. Dichogamy. N. Z. J. Bot. 24:135-162.
32. Lloyd, D. G., and J. M. A. Yates. 1982. Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36:903-913.
33. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
34. Mazer, S. J., H. Paz, and M. D. Bell. 2004. Life history, floral development, and mating system in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae): Do floral and whole-plant rates of development evolve independently? Am. J. Bot. 91:2041-2050.
35. Medan, D., and N. Bartoloni. 1998. Fecundity effects of dichogamy in an asynchronically flowering population: a genetic model. Ann. Bot. 81:373-383.
36. Nagylaki, T. 1976. A model for the evolution of self-fertilization and vegetative reproduction. J. Theor. Biol. 58:55-58.
37. Porcher, E., and R. Lande. 2005. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. J. Evol. Biol. 18:497-508.
38. Renner, S. S. 2001. How common is heterodichogamy? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:595-597.
39. Routley, M. B., and B. C. Husband. 2003. The effect of protandry on siring success in Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) with different inflorescence sizes. Evolution 57:240-248.
40. _. 2005. Responses to selection on male-phase duration in Chamerion angustifolium. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1050-1059.
41. Routley, M. B., R. I. Bertin, and B. C. Husband. 2004. Correlated evolution of dichogamy and self-incompatibility: a phylogenetic perspective. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165:983-993.
42. Sargent, R. D., and B. D. Roitberg. 2000. Seasonal decline in male-phase duration in a protandrous plant: a response to increased mating opportunities? Funct. Ecol. 14:484-489.
43. Schoen, D. J., and T.-L. Ashman. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49:131-139.
44. Uyenoyama, M. K., and D. M. Waller. 1991. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40:14-46.
45. Wells, M. S., and D. G. Lloyd. 1991. Dichogamy, gender variation and bet-hedging in Pseudowintera colorata. Evol. Ecol. 5:310-326.
46. Wyatt, R. 1983. Pollinator-plant interactions and the evolution of breeding systems. Pp. 51-95 in L. Real, ed. Pollination biology. Academic Press, Toronto.