Flexible docking of ligands into synthetic receptors using a two-sided incremental construction algorithm

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1695-1703

  Steffen, Andreas ^a   Kämper, Andreas ^a   Lengauer, Thomas ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; COMPLEXATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONFORMATIONS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; PROTEINS;

GEOMETRIC FILTERS; INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM; LIGANDS; SYNTHETIC RECEPTORS; TORSION ANGLES;

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

DRUG RECEPTOR; LIGAND;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; METABOLISM;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; RECEPTORS, DRUG;

EID: 33746913103     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci060072v     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bell, T. W.; Hou, Z.; Luo, Y.; Drew, M. G.; Chapoteau, E.; Czech, B. P.; Kumar, A., Detection of Creatinine by a Designed Receptor. Science 1995, 269, 671-674.
2. Maue, M.; Schrader, T. A Color Sensor for Catecholamines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2265-2270.
3. Davis, M. E.; Brewster, M. E. Cyclodextrin-based Pharmaceutics: Past, Present and Future. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 1023-1035.
4. Stuerzebecher, C.-S.; Witt, W.; Raduechel, B.; Skuballa, W.; Vorbrueggen, H. Prostacyclins, their Analogs or Prostaglandins and Thromboxane Antagonists for Treatment of Thrombotic and Thromboembolic Syndromes. U.S. Pat. 5,523,321, 1996.
5. Stanton, J.; Vincent, P. Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2. U.S. Pat. 6,673,908, 2001.
6. Functional Synthetic Receptors; Schrader, T., Hamilton, A. D., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005.
7. Kubinyi, H. Chance Favors the Prepared Mind - From Serendipity to Rational Drug Design. J. Recept. Signal Transduction Res. 1999, 19, 15-39.
8. Lyne, P. D., Structure-based Virtual Screening: an Overview. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 1047-1055.
9. Brooijmans, N.; Kuntz, I. D., Molecular Recognition and Docking Algorithms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003, 32, 335-373.
10. Chen, H.: Lyne, P. D.; Giordanetto, F.; Lovell, T.; Li, J. On Evaluating Molecular-docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 401-415.
11. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A Fast Flexible Docking Method Using an Incremental Construction Algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 267, 470-489.
12. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated Docking Using a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and an Empirical Binding Free Energy Function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
13. Shoichet, B.; Bodian, D.; Kuntz, I. Molecular Docking Using Shape Descriptors. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 380-397.
14. Leach, A. R.; Lemon, A. P. Exploring the Conformational Space of Protein Side Chains Using Dead-end Elimination and the A* Algorithm. Proteins: Struct.. Fund., Genet. 1998, 33, 227-239.
15. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and Validation of a Genetic Algorithm for Flexible Docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
16. Claussen, H.; Buning, C.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. FlexE: Efficient Molecular Docking Considering Protein Structure Variations. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 308, 377-395.
17. Osterberg, F.; Morris, G. M.; Sanner, M. F.; Olson, A. J.; Goodsell, D. S. Automated Docking to Multiple Target Structures: Incorporation of Protein Mobility and Structural Water Heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2002, 46, 34-40.
18. Wei, B. Q.; Weaver, L. H.; Ferrari, A. M.; Matthews, B. W.; Shoichet, B. K. Testing a Flexible-receptor Docking Algorithm in a Model Binding Site. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 1161-1182.
19. Kämper, A.; Rognan, D.; Lengauer, T. Lead Identification by Virtual Screening. In Bioinformatics - from Genome to Therapy; Lengauer, T., Ed.; VCH-Wiley: Weinheim, to appear.
20. Klebe, G. Virtual screening: Scope and Limitations. In Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery; Alvarez, J., Shoichet, B., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, 2005.
21. Hamilton, A. D.; van Engen, D. Induced Fit in Synthetic Receptors: Nucleotide Base Recognition by a "Molecular Hinge". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5035-5036.
22. Kämper, A.; Apostolakis, J.; Rarey, M.; Marian, C. M.; Lengauer, T. Fully Automated Flexible Docking of Ligands into Flexible Synthetic Receptors Using Forward and Inverse Docking Strategies. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 903-911.
23. Garcia-Tellado, F.; Goswami, S.; Chang, S.-K.; Geib, S. J.; Hamilton, A. D. Molecular Recognition: A Remarkably Simple Receptor for the Selective Complexation of Dicarboxylic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7393-7394.
24. Ballester, P.; Cápo, M.; Costa, A.; Deyà, P. M.; Gomila, R.; Decken, A.; Deslongchamps, G. Selective Binding of cis-1,3,5-Cyclohexane Tricarboxylic Acid vs its Epimeric Irans Isomer by a Tripodal Amidopyridine Receptor; Crystal Structures of the 1:1 Complexes. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 267-270.
25. Klebe, G.; Mietzner, T. A Fast and Efficient Method to Generate Biologically Relevant Conformations. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 583-606.
26. Allen, F. H. The Cambridge Structural Database: A Quarter of a Million Crystal Structures and Rising. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B.: Struct. Sci. 2002, 58, 380-388.
27. Sadowski, J.; Gasteiger, J. From Atoms and Bonds to Three-dimensional Atomic Coordinates: Automatic Model Builders. Chem. Rev. 1993, 95, 2567-2581.
28. Böhm, H.-J., LUDI: Rule-based Automatic Design of new Substituents for Enzyme - inhibitor Leads. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 6, 593-606.
29. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. E., A Geometric Approach to Macromolecule-ligand Interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
30. Bron, C.; Kerbosch, J., Algorithm 457: Finding all Cliques of an Undirected Graph. Commun. ACM 1973, 16, 575-577.
31. Böhm, H.-J., The Development of a Simple Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Constant for a Protein Ligand Complex of known Three-dimensional Structure. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
32. Bell, T. W.; Khasanov, A. B.; Drew, M. G., Role of Pyridine Hydrogen-bonding Sites in Recognition of Basic Amino Acid Side Chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14092-14103.
33. +. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2756-2759.
34. Pascal, R. A.; Ho, D. M. Molecular Structures of Host-guest Complexes with Rebek's Diacid. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 8559-8568.
35. Berl, V.; Hue, I.; Lehn, J.-M.; DeCian, A.; Fischer, J. Induced Fit Selection of a Barbiturate Receptor from a Dynamic Structural and Conformational/Configurational Library. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 11, 3089-3094.
36. Kneeland, D. M.; Ariga, K.; Lunch, V. M.; Huang, C.-Y.; Anslyn, E. V., Bis(alkylguanidinium) Receptors for Phosphodiesters: Effect of Counterions, Solvent Mixtures, and Cavity Flexibility on Complexation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10042-10055.
37. Grossel, M. C.; Merckel, D. A. S.; Hutchings, M. G. The Effect of Preorganisation on the Solid State Behaviour of Simple 'Aromatic-Cored' Bis(guanidinium) Sulfates. CrystEngComm 2003, 5, 77-81.
38. Waldvogel, S. R.; Fröhlich, R.; Schalley, C. A. First Artificial Receptor for Caffeine: A New Concept for the Complexation of Alkylated Oxopurines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2472-2475.
39. Kämper, A.; Lengauer, T., work in progress.
40. Kämper, A.; Kaspar, M.; Lengauer, T. Efficient Conformational Analysis of Synthetic Receptors with Macrocyclic and Fused Ring Systems. In Synthetic Receptors 2005, Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Synthetic Receptors; Elsevier Publishers: Oxford, 2005; p O4.
41. Raub, S.; Marian, C., work in progress.