Selective binding of cis-1,3,5-cyclohexane tricarboxylic acid vs its epimeric trans isomer by a tripodal amidopyridine receptor; crystal structures of the 1:1 complexes

Organic Letters

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 267-270

  Ballester, Pablo ^a   Capó, Magdalena ^a   Costa, Antoni ^a   Deyà, Pere M ^a   Gomila, Rosa ^a   Decken, Andreas ^b   Deslongchamps, Ghislain ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVE; PYRIDINE DERIVATIVE; TRICARBOXYLIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; STEREOISOMERISM; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; CYCLOHEXANES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PYRIDINES; STEREOISOMERISM; TRICARBOXYLIC ACIDS;

EID: 0035945747     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol0069148     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. (a) Sebo, L.; Diederich, F.; Gramlich, V. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 93.
2. (b) Sebo, L.; Schweizer, B.; Diederich, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 80.
3. (c) Lavigne, J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3666.
4. (d) Metzger, A.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 649.
5. (a) Ballester, P.; Costa, A.; Deyà, P. M.; Vega, M.; Morey, J.; Deslongchamps, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 171.
6. (b) Ballester, P.; Costa, A.; Deslongchamps, G.; Mink D.; Decken A.; Prohens R.; Tomàs S.; Vega M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997, 357.
7. (c) Ballester, P.; Costa, A.; Deyà, P. M.; González, J. F.; Rotger, M. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3813.
8. García-Tellado, F.; Goswami, S.; Chang, S.-K.; Geb, S. J.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7393.
9. Hamilton, A. D. In Bioorganic Chemistry Frontiers; Dugas, H., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991; Vol. 2, p 127.
10. 4, and concentrated in vacuo. After treatment of the residue with excess of a diazomethane/ether solution, followed by GC analysis, a ratio of the extracted triacids 2/3 = 17 was obtained.
11. -5 M), which can be considered identical within the experimental error. In this calculation we used this value as the free concentration in the equilibrium for both triacids.
12. Wadsö, I. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997, 26, 79-86. Ladbury, J. E.; Chowdry, B. Z. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 791.
13. Wadsö, I. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997, 26, 79-86. Ladbury, J. E.; Chowdry, B. Z. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 791.
14. The fact that a similar difference in the free binding energy is obtained in solvents with different hydrogen bonding capabilities suggests that the observed selectivity is not related to a difference in solvation of the triacids. We assume that the initial states of the unbound guests 2 and 3 are energetically very close.
15. Bothner-By, A. A.; Stephens, R. L.; Lee, J.-M.; Warren, C. D.; Jeanloz, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 811.
16. 3/ cyclohexane as colorless blocks.
17. Macromodel V6.0. Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N G. J.; Guida, W. C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caulfield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440.
18. This value of the downfield shift of the amide proton resonances indicates that a triple bidentate hydrogen bonding is taken place. See refs 2-4.
19. Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1976, 32, 922; Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1978, 34, 827.
20. Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1976, 32, 922; Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1978, 34, 827.
21. Hunter, C. A. Chem. Soc. Rec. 1994, 23, 101. Hunter, C. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5525.
22. Hunter, C. A. Chem. Soc. Rec. 1994, 23, 101. Hunter, C. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5525.
23. Desiraju, G. R.; Gavezzotti, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 621.