Aging, encoding fluency, and metacognitive monitoring

Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 458-478

  Emanuel Robinson, A ^a   Hertzog, Christopher ^a   Dunlosky, John ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; IMAGERY; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONITORING; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECALL; RESEARCH; TASK PERFORMANCE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33746865275     PISSN: 13825585     EISSN: 17444128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13825580600572983     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 610-632.
2. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
3. Bieman-Copland, S., & Charness, N. (1994). Memory knowledge and memory monitoring in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 9, 287-302.
4. Carrasco, M. C., Bernal, M. C., & Redolat, R. (2001). Time estimation and aging: A comparison between young and elderly adults. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 52, 91-101.
5. Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12, 50-71.
6. Craik, F. I. M., & Hay, J. F. (1999). Aging and judgments of duration: Effects of task complexity and method of estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 549-560.
7. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Aging and deficits in associative memory: What is the role of strategy production? Psychology and Aging, 13, 597-607.
8. Dunlosky, J. & Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about strategy effectiveness: A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15, 462-474.
9. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2001). Measuring strategy production during associative learning: The relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports. Memory & Cognition, 29, 247-253.
10. Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C., & Powell-Moman, A. (2005). The contribution of mediator-based deficiencies to age-related differences in associative learning. Developmental Psychology, 41, 389-400.
11. Dunlosky, J., Kubat-Silman, A. K., & Hertzog, C. (2003a). Training metacognitive skills improves older adults' associative learning. Psychology and Aging, 18, 340-345.
12. Dunlosky, J., Kubat-Silman, A. K., & Hertzog, C. (2003b). Training monitoring skills improves older adults' self-paced associative learning. Psychology and Aging, 18, 431-454.
13. Dunlosky, J., & Matvey, G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): Effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1180-1191.
14. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, E., & Kidder, D. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cued used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 22-34.
15. Hertzog, C., & Hultsch, D. F. (2000). Metacognition in adulthood and old age. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 417-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Powell-Moman, A., & Dunlosky, J. (2002). Aging and monitoring associative learning: Is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired? Psychology and Aging, 17, 209-225.
17. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
18. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
19. Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 756-766.
20. Lovelace, E. A. (1990). Aging and metacognitions concerning memory function. In E. A. Lovelace (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Mental processes, self awareness, and interventions (pp. 157-188). Amsterdam: North Holland.
21. Lovelace, E. A., & Marsh, G. (1985). Predictions and evaluation of memory performance by young and old adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 192-197.
22. Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J., & Guttentag, R. (2001). Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs? Memory & Cognition, 29, 222-232.
23. McCormack, T., Brown, G. D., Maylor, E. A., Richardson, L. B. N., & Darby, R. J. (2002). Effects of aging on absolute identification of duration. Psychology and Aging, 17, 363-378.
24. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 530-542.
25. Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Murphy, M. D., Schmitt, F. A., Caruso, M. J., & Sanders, R. E. (1987). Metamemory in older adults: The role of monitoring in serial recall. Psychology and Aging, 2, 331-339.
27. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 93-116.
28. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-116.
29. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "Delayed-JOL Effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
30. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1999). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and fragment norms. http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation last accessed 14 June 2006.
31. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 26 (pp. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
32. Perbal, S., Droit-Volet, S., Isingrini, M., & Pouthas, V. (2002) Relationships between age-related changes in time estimation and age-related changes in processing speed, attention and memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 9, 201-216.
33. Rabinowitz, J. C., Craik, F. I. M., Ackerman, B. P., & Hinchley, J. L. (1982). Aging and metamemory: the roles of relatedness and imagery. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 688-695.
34. Richardson, J. T. E. (1998). The availability and effectiveness of reported mediators in associative learning: A historical review and an experimental investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 597-614.
35. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.
36. Salthouse, T. A., Wright, R., & Ellis, C. L. (1979). Adult age and the rate of an internal clock. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 53-57.
37. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
38. Wallsten, T. S. (1996). An analysis of judgment research analyses. Organizational and Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 220-236.
39. Zachary, R. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale Revised Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.