Laterality of the performance of glaucoma mass screening using frequency-doubling technology

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 221-225

  Tatemichi, Masayuki ^a   Nakano, Tadashi ^b   Tanaka, Katsutoshi ^c   Hayashi, Takeshi ^d   Nawa, Takeshi ^d   Iwasaki, Akio ^e   Miyamoto, Toshiaki ^f   Hiro, Hisanori ^g   Sugita, Minoru ^a  

^a TOHO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b JIKEI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c TOSHIBA CORPORATION   (Japan)

^d Hitachi Health Center   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

^f NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION   (Japan)

^g Center for Occupational Health   (Japan)

Author keywords

FDT perimetry; Glaucoma; Laterality; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; CONFERENCE PAPER; EYE DISEASE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCREENING TEST; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; EYE; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0038310567     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200306000-00007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:389-393.
2. Coleman AL. Glaucoma. Lancet. 1999;354:1803-1810
3. Quigley HA, Vitale S. Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:83-91.
4. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1661-9.
5. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:209-215.
6. Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukahara S, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan - a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133-155.
7. Yamada N, Chen PP, Mills RP, et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1479-1484.
8. Alward WL. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:376-378.
9. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829.
10. Iwasaki A, Sugita M. (Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K, et al. in correction). Performance of glaucoma mass screening with a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002:134:529-537.
11. Adams CW, Bullimore MA, Wall M, et al. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:582-587.
12. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Effect of dichoptic adaptation on frequency-doubling perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:88-92.
13. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1136-1141.
14. Anderson D, Patella V. Automated Static Perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
15. Spry PG, Furber JE, Harrad RA. The effect of ocular dominance on visual field testing. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:93-97.
16. Arend O, Remky A, Cantor LB, et al. Altitudinal visual field asymmetry is coupled with altered retinal circulation in patients with normal pressure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1008-1012.
17. Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Wu JX, et al. Frequency of asymmetric visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:988-991.