Relative importance of contact conditions in explaining prejudice reduction in a classroom context: Separate and equal?

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 489-509

  Molina, Ludwin E ^a   Wittig, Michele A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHNIC GROUP; PSYCHOLOGY; RACIAL IDENTITY; STUDENT;

EID: 33746586203     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00470.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319-342.
3. Amir, Y. (1978). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In P. A. Katz (Ed.), Toward the elimination of racism. New York: Pergamon.
4. Aronson, E., Stephan, C. W., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 554-594). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
6. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
7. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
8. Cohen, E. (1980). Design and redesign of the desegregated school: Problems of status, power, and conflict. In W. G. Stephan & J. Feagin (Eds.), School desegregation (pp. 251-280). New York: Plenum.
9. Cook, S. (1962). The systematic analysis of socially significant events: A strategy for social research. Journal of Social Issues, 18, 66-84.
10. Cook, S. (1978). Interpersonal and attitudinal outcomes in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Research in Developmental Education, 12, 97-113.
11. Cook, S. (1985). Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. American Psychologist, 40, 452-460.
12. Fishbein, H. D. (1996). Peer prejudice and discrimination: Evolutionary, cultural, and developmental dynamics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press.
14. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
15. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25(2), 224-249.
16. Green, C. W., Adams, A. M., & Turner, C. W. (1988). Development and validation of the school interracial climate scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 241-259.
17. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis'. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
18. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(2), 242-256.
19. Huo, Y. J., Molina, L. E., Sawahata, R., & Deang, J. (2005). Leadership and the management of conflicts in diverse groups: Why acknowledging versus neglecting subgroup identity matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 237-254.
20. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1982). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning experiences on cross-ethnic interaction and friendships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(4), 421-428.
21. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 5-14.
22. Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2001). Is there any scapegoat around? Determinants of intergroup conflicts at different categorization levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1090-1102.
23. Molina, L. E., Wittig, M. A., & Giang, M. T. (2004). Mutual acculturation and social categorization: A comparison of two perspectives on intergroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(3), 239-265.
24. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 158-174.
25. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
26. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 93-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
28. Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176.
29. Ponterotto, J. G., Burkard, A., Rieger, B. P., Grieger, I., D'Onofrio, A., Dubuisson, A., et al. (1995). Development and initial validation of the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 1016-1031.
30. Robinson, J. W., & Preston, J. D. (1976). Equal-status contact and modification of racial prejudice: A re-examination of the contact hypothesis. Social Forces, 54, 911-924.
31. Sears, D. O., Fu, M., Henry, P. J., & Bui, K. (2003). The origins and persistence of ethnic identity among the "new immigrant" groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(4), 419-437.
32. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies in intergroup relations. New York: Harper.
33. Stephan, C. W., Renfro, L., & Stephan, W. G. (2004). The evaluation of multicultural education programs: Techniques and a meta-analysis. In W. G. Stephan & W. P. Wogt (Eds.), Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 227-242). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Stephan, C. W., & Stephan, W. G. (2004). Intergroup relations in multicultural education programs. In J. A. Banks & C. McGee-Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 782-798). New York: Jossey-Bass.
35. Stephan, W. G. (1987). The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 13-40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Stephan, W. G. (1999). Reducing prejudice and stereotyping in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Intergroup relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
38. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
40. Tropp, L. R. (2006). Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 171-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16 (12), 951-957.
42. Walker, I., & Crogan, M. (1998). Academic performance, prejudice, sand the jigsaw classroom: New pieces to the puzzle. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8(6), 381-393.
43. Wittig, M. A., & Molina, L. (2000). Moderators and mediators of prejudice reduction. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 295-318). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.