Leadership and the management of conflicts in diverse groups: Why acknowledging versus neglecting subgroup identity matters

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 237-254

  Huo, Yuen J ^a   Molina, Ludwin E ^a   Sawahata, Rina ^a   Deang, Josephine M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244364842     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.243     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 629-639.
3. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
4. Cohen, G. L., & Steele, C. M. (2002). A barrier of mistrust: How negative stereotypes affect cross-race mentoring. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 303-327). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504-553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Eggins, R. A., Haslam, S. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2002). Social identity and negotiation: Subgroup representation and superordinate consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 887-899.
7. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 766-778.
8. Fredrickson, G. M. (1999). Models of American ethnic relations: A historical perspective. In D. A. Prentice, & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming conflict (pp. 23-34). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
10. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
11. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 22, 267-277.
12. Gonzalez, R., & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195-214.
13. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
14. Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83-113.
15. Hornsey, M., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
16. Huo, Y. J. (2003). Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 336-348.
17. Huo, Y. J. Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Huo, Y. J., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Ethnic diversity and the viability of organizations: The role of procedural justice in bridging differences. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 214-244). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
19. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem: Is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
20. Jetten, J., O'Brien, A., & Trindall, N. (2002). Changing identity: Predicting adjustment to organizational restructure as a function of subgroup and superordinate identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 281-298.
21. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Upper Sadler River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
22. Koper, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 313-325.
23. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
24. Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1508-1519.
25. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Schlesinger, A. M. (1992). The disuniting of America: Reflections on a multicultural society. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
27. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171-200.
28. Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., Ortiz, D., & Lind, E. A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 34, 470-493.
29. Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2003). Interpersonal treatment, social identity and organizational behavior. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 155-171). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
30. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
31. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
32. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
33. Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., Ohbuchi, K., Sugawara, I., & Huo, Y. (1998). Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 137-146.
34. van Leeuwen, E., van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effect of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 679-690.
35. Wit, A. P., & Kerr, N. L. (2002). 'Me vs. just us vs. us all' Categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 616-637.