Mutual acculturation and social categorization: A comparison of two perspectives on intergroup bias

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 239-265

  Molina, Ludwin Edgardo ^a,b   Wittig, Michele Andrisin ^a,c   Giang, Michael Thuan ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective intergroup bias; Common ingroup identity; Interracial climate

Indexed keywords

EID: 28744445665     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430204046110     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ainsworth, A., Wittig, M. A., & Molina, L. E. (2003). Psychometric improvements in measures of social categorization: A field test with high school students. Manuscript in preparation, California State University at Northridge.
2. Ainsworth, A., Wittig, M. A., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (2003). A comparative test of ethnic group differences in an acculturation model of prejudice reduction in two multicultural educational programs. Manuscript in preparation, California State University at Northridge.
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629-639.
6. Berry, J. W. (1991). Understanding and managing multiculturalism: Some possible implications of research in Canada. Psychology & Developing Societies, 3, 17-49.
7. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-34.
8. Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 5 7, 615-631.
9. Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. M. Chun, P. B. Organista, & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 17-37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Berry, J. W., Trimble, J. E., & Olmedo, E. L. (1986). Assessment of acculturation. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 291-324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, and content (pp. 35-58). Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 554-594). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Brewer, M. B., & Gaertner, S. L. (2001). Toward reduction of prejudice: Intergroup contact and social categorization. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 451-472). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Combating intergroup biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 101-105.
15. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 137-163). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press.
17. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
18. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224-249.
19. Gonzalez, R., & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195-214.
20. Green, C. W., Adams, A. M., & Turner, C. W. (1988). Development and validation of the school interracial climate scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 241-259.
21. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
22. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
23. Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404.
24. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
25. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
26. Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176.
27. Phinney, J. S., Horenczyk, G., Liebkind, K., & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 493-510.
28. Plaut, V. (2002). Cultural models of diversity in America: The psychology of difference and inclusion. In R. A. Schweder, M. Minow, & H. R. Marcus (Eds.), Engaging cultural differences: The multicultural challenge in liberal democracies (pp. 365-395). New York: Russell Sage.
29. Ponterotto, J. G., Burkard, A., Rieger, B. P., Grieger, I., D'Onofrio, A., Dubuisson, A. et al. (1995). Development and initial validation of the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 1016-1031.
30. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2003). Calculation for the Sobel Test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
31. Rudmin, F. W., & Ahmadzadeh, V. (2001). Psychometric critique of acculturation psychology: The case of Iranian migrants in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42 (1), 41-56.
32. Ryder, A. G., Alden, L. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head to head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 49-65.
33. Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102-133.
34. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
36. Wittig, M. A., & Molina, L. (2000). Moderators and mediators of prejudice reduction. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 295-318). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.