Issue news and corporate reputation: Applying the theories of agenda setting and issue ownership in the field of business communication

Journal of Communication

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 543-559

  Meijer, May May ^a   Kleinnijenhuis, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS; OWNERSHIP; PANEL DATA;

EID: 33746542730     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00300.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Atwood, L. E., Sohn, A. B., & Sohn, H. (1978). Daily newspaper contributions to community discussion. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 570-576.
2. Bakker, P., & Scholten, O. (2003). Communicatiekaart in Nederland: Overzicht van media en communicatie [Communication map in the Netherlands: Overview of media and communication]. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Botan, C. H., & Taylor, M. (2004). Public relations: State of the field. Journal of Communication, 54, 645-661.
4. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
5. Budge, I., & Farlie, D. J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London: George Allen & Unwin.
6. Carroll, C. E. (2004). How the mass media influence perceptions of corporate reputation: Exploring agenda-setting effects within business news coverage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin.
7. Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public's images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 16(1), 36-46.
8. Dalton, R. J., Beck, P. A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 111-126.
9. Dawar, N., Parker, P. M., & Price, L. J. (1996). A cross-cultural study of interpersonal information exchange. Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 497-516.
10. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091-1112.
12. de Ridder, J. (1994). Van tekst naar informatie [From text to information]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
13. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
14. Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation Quotient SM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241-255.
17. Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233-258.
18. Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 205-242.
19. Hertog, J. K., & Fan, D. P. (1995). The impact of press coverage on social beliefs: The case of HIV transmission. Communication Research, 22, 545-574.
20. Himmelfarb, S. (1993). The measurement of attitudes. In A. H. Eagly & S. Chaiken (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes (pp. 23-88). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
21. Kiousis, S., Bantimaroudis, P., & Hyun, B. (1999). Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26, 414-428.
22. Kleinnijenhuis, J., de Ridder, J., & Rietberg, E. M. (1997). Reasoning in economic discourse: An application of the network approach to the Dutch press. In C. W. Roberts (Ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts (pp. 191-207). New York: Erlbaum.
23. Knight, M. G. (1999). Getting past the impasse: Framing as a tool for public relations. Public Relations Review, 25, 381-398.
24. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
25. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Campanella Bracken, C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587-604.
26. Maathuis, O. J. M. (1999). Corporate branding: The value of the corporate brand to customers and managers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
27. McCombs, M. (1992). Explorers and surveyors: Expanding strategies for agenda setting research. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 813-824.
28. McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 703-717.
29. McCombs, M., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Llamas, J. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77-92.
30. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
31. Meijer, M. M. (2005). Does success breed success? Effect of news and advertising on corporate reputation. Amsterdam: Aksant.
32. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315.
33. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
34. Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952-2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118, 599-626.
35. Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. London: Sage.
36. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
38. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2-3), 297-316.
39. Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339-370.
40. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., & Bernstein, A. (1966). The analysis of product image. In P. J. Stone, D. C. Dunphy, M. S. Smith, & D. M. Ogilvie (Eds.), The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Verčič, D. (2000). Trust in organisations: A study of the relations between media coverage, public perceptions and profitability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
42. Wartick, S. L. (1992). The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business & Society, 31(1), 33-49.