Library databases as writing-course anthologies: Implications of a new kind of online textbook

Public Services Quarterly

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 67-79

  Knievel, Jennifer E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthologies; Electronic textbooks; Faculty collaboration; Information literacy; University libraries; Writing programs

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746539703     PISSN: 15228959     EISSN: 15229114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J295v01n04_05     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Angelo, Thomas A. 1999. Doing Assessment as if Learning Matters Most. 16 December 2002. http://www.aahebulletin.com/public/archive/angelomay99.asp.
2. Arp, Lori, and Lizabeth A. Wilson. 1989. Structures of bibliographic instruction programs: A continuum for planning. The Reference Librarian 24: 25-34.
3. Besser, Donna, Gerald Stone, and Luan Nan. 1999. Textbooks and teaching: A lesson from students. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 53, no. 4: 4-17.
4. Bruce, Christine S. 1998. The phenomenon of information literacy. Higher Education Research and Development 17, no. 1: 25-43.
5. Council of Writing Program Administrators. 1999. WPA outcomes statement for first-year composition. WPA: Writing Program Administration 23, no. 1/2: 59-66.
6. Dorner, Jennifer L., Susan E. Taylor, and Kay Hodson-Carlton. 2001. Faculty-librarian collaboration for nursing information literacy: A tiered approach. Reference Services Review 29, no. 2: 132-40.
7. Duin, Ann Hill, and Kathleen S. Gorak. 1992. Developing texts for computers and composition: A collaborative process. Computers and Composition 9, no. 2: 17-39.
8. Emmons, Mark, and Wanda Martin. 2002. Engaging conversation: Evaluating the contribution of library instruction to the quality of student research. College and Research Libraries 63, no. 6: 545-60.
9. Figg, Kristen M. 1992. Handbook use in College English I: Classroom practices and student response. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 19: 185-91.
10. Gareis, Karen C. 1995. Critiquing articles cited in the introductory textbook: A writing assignment. Teaching of Psychology 22, no. 4: 233-35.
11. Gresham, Keith. 1997. Electronic classrooms: Linking information concepts to online exploration. RQ 36: 514-20.
12. Iannuzzi, Patricia. 1999. We are teaching, but are they learning: Accountability, productivity, and assessment. Journal of Academic Librarianship 25, no. 4: 304-05.
13. Information Literacy Competency Standards Task Force. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. 4 October 2002. http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilstandardlo.html.
14. Langley, David. 1990. Composition classroom anthologies: Some exploratory thoughts and suggestions for further research. Notes: Education Resources Information Center Document number ED321269. Paper presented at the Conference on Rhetoric and the Teaching of Writing (Indiana, PA, July 1990).
15. Maughan, Patricia Davitt. 2001. Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: A discussion of the literature and the University of California-Berkeley assessment experience. College and Research Libraries 62, no. 1: 71-85.
16. Oberman, Cerise. 1996. Library instruction: Concepts and pedagogy in the electronic environment. RQ 35: 315-23.
17. Program for Writing and Rhetoric. University of Colorado Program of Writing and Rhetoric. 16 December 2002. http://www.colorado.edu/pwr/.
18. Reference Department, University of Colorado at Boulder. Reference Instruction Resources: First-Year Course, Programfor Writing and Rhetoric. 16 December 2002. http://www-libraries.colorado.edu/ref/pwr/.
19. Sonntag, Gabriela, and Donna M. Ohr. 1996. The development of a lower-division, general education, course-integrated information literacy program. College and Research Libraries 57, no. 4: 331-38.