Gustatory processing: a dynamic systems approach

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 420-428

  Jones, Lauren M ^a   Fontanini, Alfredo ^a   Katz, Donald B ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; GUSTATORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TASTE DISCRIMINATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONS, AFFERENT; SMELL; TASTE; TASTE BUDS; VISCERAL AFFERENTS;

EID: 33746496149     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.011     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Van Essen D.C., Anderson C.H., and Felleman D.J. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science 255 (1992) 419-423
2. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Zacks J.M., and Raichle M.E. Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nat Neurosci 9 (2006) 23-25
3. Lee T.S., Yang C.F., Romero R.D., and Mumford D. Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency. Nat Neurosci 5 (2002) 589-597
4. Schummers J., Marino J., and Sur M. Local networks in visual cortex and their influence on neuronal responses and dynamics. J Physiol (Paris) 98 (2004) 429-441
5. Katz D.B., Nicolelis M.A., and Simon S.A. Gustatory processing is dynamic and distributed. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12 (2002) 448-454
6. Mueller K.L., Hoon M.A., Erlenbach I., Chandrashekar J., Zuker C.S., and Ryba N.J. The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste. Nature 434 (2005) 225-229. Using a combination of genetic, behavioral and physiological approaches, the authors present convincing evidence that T2R receptors are necessary and sufficient for the perception of bitterness. This study demonstrates the basics of bitter taste transduction.
7. Zhao G.Q., Zhang Y., Hoon M.A., Chandrashekar J., Erlenbach I., Ryba N.J., and Zuker C.S. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 115 (2003) 255-266
8. Delay E.R., Hernandez N.P., Bromley K., and Margolskee R.F. Sucrose and monosodium glutamate taste thresholds and discrimination ability of T1R3 knockout mice. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 351-357. By using very similar mice to those used by Zhao et al. [7] and moderate-concentration bitter and sweet stimuli, the authors showed that the lack of T1R3 does not make mice incapable of performing a go-no-go task (in which recognition of taste quality allows the animal to gain water reward). Thus, these mice must retain some sensibility toward the tastes, perhaps transduced by as-of-yet unidentified mechanisms.
9. Marella S., Fischler W., Kong P., Asgarian S., Rueckert E., and Scott K. Imaging taste responses in the fly brain reveals a functional map of taste category and behavior. Neuron 49 (2006) 285-295. Using in vivo calcium imaging, the authors demonstrate that sweet and bitter cell activation drives palatability behaviors in Drosophila. These elegant results pave the way for future studies involving large arrays of tastants.
10. Danilova V., and Hellekant G. Sense of taste in a new world monkey, the common marmoset. II. Link between behavior and nerve activity. J Neurophysiol 92 (2004) 1067-1076
11. Berman D.E., Hazvi S., Neduva V., and Dudai Y. The role of identified neurotransmitter systems in the response of insular cortex to unfamiliar taste: activation of ERK1-2 and formation of a memory trace. J Neurosci 20 (2000) 7017-7023
12. Reilly S., and Bornovalova M.A. Conditioned taste aversion and amygdala lesions in the rat: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29 (2005) 1067-1088
13. Travers J.B., Dinardo L.A., and Karimnamazi H. Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 21 (1997) 631-647
14. Smith D.V., John S.J., and Boughter J.D. Neuronal cell types and taste quality coding. Physiol Behav 69 (2000) 77-85
15. Lemon C.H., and Smith D.V. Neural representation of bitter taste in the nucleus of the solitary tract. J Neurophysiol 94 (2005) 3719-3729. Data obtained in this study convincingly demonstrate that classically identified 'bitter' neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract respond to other taste stimuli as well. These finding suggests that, on a single-trial basis, responses in these neurons might not reliably signal bitter tastants.
16. Hill D.L. Neural plasticity in the gustatory system. Nutr Rev 62 (2004) S208-S217 discussion S224-241
17. Vandenbeuch A., Pillias A.M., and Faurion A. Modulation of taste peripheral signal through interpapillar inhibition in hamsters. Neurosci Lett 358 (2004) 137-141
18. Sato T., Okada Y., Miyazaki T., Kato Y., and Toda K. Taste cell responses in the frog are modulated by parasympathetic efferent nerve fibers. Chem Senses 30 (2005) 761-769
19. Gairns F.W., and Garven H.S. Ganglion cells in the mammalian tongue. J Physiol 118 (1952) 53P-54P
20. Smith D.V., Ye M.K., and Li C.S. Medullary taste responses are modulated by the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Chem Senses 30 (2005) 421-434
21. Li C.S., Cho Y.K., and Smith D.V. Modulation of parabrachial taste neurons by electrical and chemical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and amygdala. J Neurophysiol 93 (2005) 1183-1196
22. Lundy Jr. R.F., and Norgren R. Activity in the hypothalamus, amygdala, and cortex generates bilateral and convergent modulation of pontine gustatory neurons. J Neurophysiol 91 (2004) 1143-1157
23. Smith D.V., Li C.S., and Cho Y.K. Forebrain modulation of brainstem gustatory processing. Chem Senses 30 (2005) i176-i177
24. Flynn F.W., Shulkin J., Grill H.J., and Norgren R. Gentral gustatory lesions: II. Effects on sodium appetite, taste aversion learning, and feeding behaviors. Behav Neurosci 105 (1991) 944-954
25. Ghazanfar A.A., and Schroeder C.E. Is neocortex essentially multisensory?. Trends Cogn Sci 10 (2006) 278-285
26. Bulkin D.A., and Groh J.M. Seeing sounds: visual and auditory interactions in the brain. Curr Opin Neurol 16 (2006) this issue
27. Small D.M., and Prescott J. Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp Brain Res 166 (2005) 345-357
28. Djordjevic J., Zatorre R.J., and Jones-Gotman M. Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Exp Brain Res 159 (2004) 405-408
29. Sugai T., Yoshimura H., and Onoda N. Functional reciprocal connections between olfactory and gustatory pathways. Chem Senses 30 (2005) i166-i167
30. Fu W., Sugai T., Yoshimura H., and Onoda N. Convergence of olfactory and gustatory connections onto the endopiriform nucleus in the rat. Neuroscience 126 (2004) 1033-1041
31. Katz D.B., Simon S.A., and Nicolelis M.A. Taste-specific neuronal ensembles in the gustatory cortex of awake rats. J Neurosci 22 (2002) 1850-1857
32. Bahar A., Dudai Y., and Ahissar E. Neural signature of taste familiarity in the gustatory cortex of the freely behaving rat. J Neurophysiol 92 (2004) 3298-3308. This behaviorally relevant study demonstrates that GC neurons change upon repeated exposure. GC neurons were found to process multiple taste attributes during different temporal phases of their response - effects that might be overlooked when classifying responses as average firing rates over large time bins.
33. Yoshimura H., Kato N., Sugai T., Honjo M., Sato J., Segami N., and Onoda N. To-and-fro optical voltage signal propagation between the insular gustatory and parietal oral somatosensory areas in rat cortex slices. Brain Res 1015 (2004) 114-121
34. Stone M.E., Grimes B.S., and Katz D.B. Hippocampal inactivation enhances taste learning. Learn Mem 12 (2005) 579-586. The authors unexpectedly reveal that reversible inactivation of the hippocampus during training strongly enhances the learning of a conditioned taste aversion. Taste learning was previously thought to involve only the amygdalar memory system but it must now expand to include hippocampal contributions.
35. Eichenbaum H. Hippocampus: cognitive processes and neural representations that underlie declarative memory. Neuron 44 (2004) 109-120
36. Bures J., Bermúdez-Rattoni F., and Yamamoto T. In: Mackintosh N.J., Shallice T., Schacter D., Treisman A., and Weiskrantz L. (Eds). Conditioned taste aversion: Memory of a special kind (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Tracy A.L., Jarrard L.E., and Davidson T.L. The hippocampus and motivation revisited: appetite and activity. Behav Brain Res 127 (2001) 13-23
38. Davidson T.L., and Jarrard L.E. A role for hippocampus in the utilization of hunger signals. Behav Neural Biol 59 (1993) 167-171
39. Tokita K., Karadi Z., Shimura T., and Yamamoto T. Centrifugal inputs modulate taste aversion learning associated parabrachial neuronal activities. J Neurophysiol 92 (2004) 265-279
40. Packard M.G., and Wingard J.C. Amygdala and 'emotional' modulation of the relative use of multiple memory systems. Neurobiol Learn Mem 82 (2004) 243-252
41. Lipska B.K., Jaskiw G.E., Chrapusta S., Karoum F., and Weinberger D.R. Ibotenic acid lesion of the ventral hippocampus differentially affects dopamine and its metabolites in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex in the rat. Brain Res 585 (1992) 1-6
42. Kobayakawa T., Ogawa H., Kaneda H., Ayabe-Kanamura S., Endo H., and Saito S. Spatio-temporal analysis of cortical activity evoked by gustatory stimulation in humans. Chem Senses 24 (1999) 201-209
43. Yamamoto T., Fujimoto Y., Shimura T., and Sakai N. Conditioned taste aversion in rats with excitotoxic brain lesions. Neurosci Res 22 (1995) 31-49
44. Berman D.E., and Dudai Y. Memory extinction, learning anew, and learning the new: dissociations in the molecular machinery of learning in cortex. Science 291 (2001) 2417-2419
45. Squire L.R. Memory & Brain (1987), Oxford U. Press, NYC
46. Ashkenazi A., and Marks L.E. Effect of endogenous attention on detection of weak gustatory and olfactory flavors. Percept Psychophys 66 (2004) 596-608
47. Fontanini A., and Katz D.B. 7 to 12 Hz activity in rat gustatory cortex reflects disengagement from a fluid self-administration task. J Neurophysiol 93 (2005) 2832-2840
48. Bezdudnaya T., Cano M., Bereshpolova Y., Stoelzel C.R., Alonso J.M., and Swadlow H.A. Thalamic burst mode and inattention in the awake LGNd. Neuron 49 (2006) 421-432
49. Womelsdorf T., Fries P., Mitra P.P., and Desimone R. Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection. Nature 439 (2006) 733-736. This powerful study demonstrates the effects of attention on neuronal response and behavioral latencies in single trials. Attention to gustatory stimuli might similarly be predictive of tastant-related firing patterns and behavioral response latencies.
50. Nitschke J.B., Dixon G.E., Sarinopoulos I., Short S.J., Cohen J.D., Smith E.E., Kosslyn S.M., Rose R.M., and Davidson R.J. Altering expectancy dampens neural response to aversive taste in primary taste cortex. Nat Neurosci 9 (2006) 435-442
51. Kobayashi M., Takeda M., Hattori N., Fukunaga M., Sasabe T., Inoue N., Nagai Y., Sawada T., Sadato N., and Watanabe Y. Functional imaging of gustatory perception and imagery: 'top-down' processing of gustatory signals. Neuroimage 23 (2004) 1271-1282
52. Gutierrez R., Carmena J.M., Nicolelis M.A., and Simon S.A. Orbitofrontal ensemble activity monitors licking and distinguishes among natural rewards. J Neurophysiol 95 (2006) 119-133. Together with the Kobayashi et al. [51], this paper makes it clear that orbitofrontal cortex neurons are active and involved in taste processing when a rat is awake and pursuing its taste experiences (via licking).
53. Grill H.J., Spector A.C., Schwartz G.J., Kaplan J.M., and Flynn F.W. Evaluating taste effects on ingestive behavior. In: Toates (Ed). Feeding and Drinking (1987), Elsevier, Rowland 151-188
54. Flynn F.W., and Grill H.J. Intraoral intake and taste reactivity responses elicited by sucrose and sodium chloride in chronic decerebrate rats. Behav Neurosci 102 (1988) 934-941
55. Fiser J., Chiu C., and Weliky M. Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision. Nature 431 (2004) 573-578. These researchers recorded the activity of multiple primary visual cortical neurons and demonstrated that the intrinsic dynamics of the networks have a much more potent role in shaping activity in the presence of visual stimulation than do the spatial and temporal properties of the stimuli themselves.
56. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D.C., and Raichle M.E. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 9673-9678
57. Nir Y., Hasson U., Levy I., Yeshurun Y., and Malach R. Widespread functional connectivity and fMRI fluctuations in human visual cortex in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuroimage 30 (2006) 1313-1324
58. Di Lorenzo P.M., and Victor J.D. Taste response variability and temporal coding in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat. J Neurophysiol 90 (2003) 1418-1431
59. Bazhenov M., Stopfer M., Sejnowski T.J., and Laurent G. Fast odor learning improves reliability of odor responses in the locust antennal lobe. Neuron 46 (2005) 483-492
60. Mazor O., and Laurent G. Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron 48 (2005) 661-673. The authors convincingly demonstrate that projection neuron populations respond with odor-specific dynamic responses, and are best decoded when analyzed in a dynamic rather than static manner. These results might apply to gustatory population responses that show similarly dynamic responses.
61. Stapleton J.R., Lavine M.L., Wolpert R.L., Nicolelis M.A., and Simon S.A. Rapid taste responses in the gustatory cortex during licking. J Neurosci 26 (2006) 4126-4138
62. Katz D.B., Simon S.A., and Nicolelis M.A. Dynamic and multimodal responses of gustatory cortical neurons in awake rats. J Neurosci 21 (2001) 4478-4489
63. Halpern B.P., and Tapper D.N. Taste stimuli: quality coding time. Science 171 (1971) 1256-1258
64. de Araujo, IE, Gutierrez R, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Pereira A, Nicolelis MAL, Simon SA: Neural ensemble coding of satiety states. Neuron, in press.
65. Lemon, CR, Smith, DV: Influence of response variability on the coding performance of central gustatory neurons. J Neurosci, in press.