Agent-based literacy theory

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 352-371

  Mceneaney, John E ^a  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746387430     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.41.3.3     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. ANDERSON-INMAN, L., & HORNEY, M.A. (1998). Transforming text for at-risk readers. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 15-43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. ANDROUTSOPOULOS, I., MAGIROU, E.F., & VASSILAKIS, D.K. (2005). A game theoretic model of spam e-mailing, In Proceedings of the Second Conference on E-mail and Anti-Spam, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Retrieved October 9, 2005, from http://www.ceas.ee/papers-2005/113.pdf
3. BARABASI, A.L., & BONABEAU, E. (2003, May). Scale-free networks. Scientific American, 288(5), 60-69.
4. BEACH, R. (1993). A teacher's introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5. BERNERS-LEE, T., HENDLER, J., & LASSILA, O. (2001, May). The semantic web. Scientific American. Retrieved October 9, 2005, from http://www. seientificamerican.com/article.cfm?articleID-00048144-10D2-1C70- 84A9809EC588EF21&catID-2
6. BODEN, M. (1990). Escaping from the Chinese room. In M.A, Boden (Ed.), The philosophy of artificial intelligence (pp. 89-104). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. CARMEL, D., & MARKOVITCH, S. (1999). Exploration strategies for model-based learning in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 2, 141-172.
8. CHAU, M., ZENG, D., & CHEN, H. (2001). Personalized spiders for web search and analysis. Proceedings of the First ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 79-87.
9. COCKBURN, A., MCKENZIE, B., & JASONSMITH, M. (2002). Pushing back: Evaluating a new behaviour for the back and forward buttons in web browsers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 397-414.
10. DENNETT, D.C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. DENNETT, D.C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. DEWEY, J. (1903). The control of ideas by facts. In J. Dewey, Essays in experimental logic (pp. 230-249). New York: Dover.
13. DEWEY, J. (1981). Experience and nature. In J.A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, the later works, 1925-1953, Vol. 1 (pp. 1-326). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. DEWEY, J., & BENTLEY, A.F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
15. D'INVERNO, M., & LUCK, M. (2001). Understanding agent systems (1st ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
16. DIXON, N.F. (1971). Subliminal perception: The nature of a controversy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. DÖRRE, J., GERSTL, P., & SEIFFERT, R. (1999). Text mining: Finding nuggets in mountains of textual data. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 398-401.
18. DUMAIS, S. (2003). Data-driven approaches to information access. Cognitive Science, 27, 491-524.
19. FENSEL, D., HENDLER, J., LIEBERMAN, H., & WAHLSTER, W. (2003). Spinning the semantic web. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. FREIRE, P. (1995). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
21. GARRISON, J. (1994). Realism, Deweyan pragmatism and educational research. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 5-14.
22. GEE, J.P. (2004). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 116-132). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. GILLIES, M., & BALLIN, D. (2004). Integrating autonomous behavior and user control for believable agents. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1 (pp. 336-343). New York: ACM Press.
24. GOLOVCHINSKY, G. (2002). Going back in hypertext. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 82-83). New York: ACM Press.
25. GOUGH, P.B. (2004). One second of reading: Postscript. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1180-1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
26. GRAESSER, A.C., & GOODMAN, S.M. (1985). Implicit knowledge, question answering, and the representation of expository text. In B.K. Britton & J.B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 109-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. GUINEE, K., EAGLETON, M.B., & HALL, T.E. (2003). Adolescents' Internet search strategies: Drawing upon familiar cognitive paradigms when accessing electronic information sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 363-374.
28. HAUSER, L. (2001). The Chinese room argument. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved October 9, 2005, from http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/c/chineser.htm
29. HENDLER, J., BERNERS-LEE, T., & MILLER, E. (2002). Integrating applications on the semantic web. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 122, 676-680. Retrieved October 9, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/2002/07/swint
30. HERDER, E., & VAN DIJK, E.M.A.G. (2002). Personalized adaptation to device characteristics. In P. de Bra, P. Brusilovsky, & R.R. Conejo (Eds.), Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 598-602). New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. HIRSCH, T., FORLIZZI, J., HYDER, E., GOETZ, J., STROBACK, J., & KURTZ, C. (2000). The ELDer project: Social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability (pp. 72-79). New York: ACM Press.
32. HU, M., & LIU, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 168-177). New York: ACM Press.
33. ISER, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34. KAROLIDES, N.J. (1999). Theory and practice: An interview with Louise M. Rosenblatt. Language Arts, 77, 158-170.
35. KINTSCH, W., & VAN DIJK, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
36. LAKOFF, G., & JOHNSON, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
37. LANDAUER, T.K. (1999). Latent semantic analysis: A theory of the psychology of language and mind. Discourse Processes, 27, 303-331.
38. LANDOW, G.L. (1992). Hypertext, the convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. LEU, D.J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. LEU, D.J., & HILLINGER, M. (1994, December). Reading comprehension in hypermedia: Supporting changes to children's conceptions of a scientific principle. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
41. LEU, D.J., KINZER, C.K., COIRO, J.L., & CAMMACK, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
42. LONGACRE, R.E. (1996). The grammar of discourse (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
43. LUCKING-REILEY, D. (2000). Vickrey auctions in practice: From nineteenth-century philately to twenty-first century e-commerce. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 183-192.
44. MCENEANEY, J.E. (2003). A transactional theory of hypertext structure. In C.M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, J.V. Hoffman, & D.L. Schallen (Eds.), 52nd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 272-284). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
45. MCKENNA, M.C. (1998). Electronic text and the transformation of beginning reading. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 45-59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. MENEGUZZI, F.R., MEIRELLES, L.L., MANO, F.T.M., OLIVEIRA, J.B, & DA SILVA, A.B. (2004). Strategies for document optimization in digital publishing. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (pp. 163-170). New York: ACM Press.
47. MERIKLE, P.M., & DANEMAN, M. (1996). Memory for unconsciously perceived events: Evidence from anesthetized patients. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 525-541.
48. MERIKLE, P.M., & DANEMAN, M. (1998). Psychological investigations of unconscious perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5, 5-18.
49. MEYER, B.J.F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B.K. Britton &J.B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 11-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. MEYER, B.J.F., & POON, L.W. (2004). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of'reading (5th ed., pp. 810-851). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
51. MILLETT, L.I., FRIEDMAN, B., & FELTEN, E. (2001). Cookies and Web browser design: Toward realizing informed consent online. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 46-52). New York: ACM Press.
52. MOSENTHAL, P.B. (1996). Understanding the strategies of document literacy and their conditions of use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 314-332.
53. MURRAY, J. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES. (2004). Heroism and horror. In Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Official Government Edition, pp. 278-323). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
55. PARSONS, S., & WOOLDRIDGE, M. (2002). Game theory and decision theory in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 5, 243-254.
56. PEARSON, P.D., & CAMPERELL, K. (1994). Comprehension of text structures. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th Éd., pp. 448-468). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
57. PINKER, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
58. PURVIS, L., HARRINGTON, S., O'SULLIVAN, B., & FREUDER, E.G. (2003). Creating personalized documents: An optimization approach. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (pp. 68-77). New York: ACM Press.
59. REINKING, D. (2001). Multimedia and engaged reading in a digital world. In L. Verhoeven & C. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation (pp. 195-221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. REY, G. (1986). What's really going on in Searle's "Chinese Room." Philosophical Studies, 50, 169-185.
61. ROSENBERG, J. (1996). The structure of hypertext activity. In Proceedings of the Seventh Hypertext Conference of the Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 22-30). New York: ACM Press.
62. ROSENBLATT, L.M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
63. ROSENBLATT, L.M. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
64. ROSENBLATT, L.M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1363-1398). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
65. ROSENSCHEIN, J.S., & ZLOTKIN, G. (1994). Rules of encounter: Designing conventions for automated negotiation among computers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. ROTH, A.E., & XING, X. (1994). Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. American Economic Review, 84, 992-1044.
67. RUDDELL, R.B., RUDDELL, M.R., & SINGER, H. (1994). Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
68. RUDDELL, R.B., & UNRAU, N.J. (2004). Models of reading and writing processes. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1116-1126). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
69. RUMELHART, D.E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 864-894). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
70. SAMUELS, S.J. (2004), Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited, In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1127-1148). Newark, DE: International Reading Assocition.
71. SAXE J.G. (1936). The blind men and the elephant. In H. Felleman (Ed.), The best loved poems of the American people (pp. 521-522). New York: Doubleday.
72. SEARLE, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
73. SEARLE, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-424.
74. SEARLE, J. (1984). Minds, brains, and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75. SEMALI, L.M., & PAILLIOTET, A.W. (1999). Introduction: What is in intermediality and why study it in U. S. classrooms? In L. Semali & A.W. Pailliotet (Eds.), Intermediality (pp. 1-29). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
76. SHOHAM, Y. (1993). Agent-oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence, 60(1), 51-92.
77. SPINELLIS, D. (2003). The decay and failures of web references. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 71-77.
78. STANOVICH, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
79. TIERNEY, R.J. (1994). Dissensions, tensions, and the models of literacy. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 1162-1182). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
80. TURING, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433-460.
81. W3C (World Wide Web Consortium, 2005). Semantic web activity statement. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ Activity
82. WAGNER, T., PHELPS, J., GURALNIK, V., & VANRIPER, R. (2004). COORDINATORS: Coordination managers for first responders. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 1140-1147). Washington, DC: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society.
83. WEBB, J.C. (1980). Mechanism, mentalism, and metamathematics: An essay on finitism. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
84. WEGNER, D.M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. WEISKRANTZ, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. New York: Oxford University Press.
86. WEISKRANTZ, L. (2002). Prime-sight and blindsight. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 568-581.
87. WILLERTON, C. (2000). Structure problems in hypertext mysteries. In K. Anderson & F. Shipman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Hypertext Conference of the Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 234-235). New York: ACM Press.
88. WOOLDRIDGE, M. (2000). Reasoning about rationale agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. WOOLDRIDGE, M., & JENNINGS, N.R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10, 115-152.
90. YU, B., & SINGH, M.P. (2003). Detecting deception in reputation management. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference On Autonomous Agents And Multiagent Systems (pp. 73-80). New York: ACM Press.