Assessment of cardiac function using multidetector row computed tomography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 555-563

  Orakzai, Sarwar H ^a   Orakzai, Raza H ^a   Nasir, Khurram ^a,b   Budoff, Matthew J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ejection fraction; Left ventricular function; Magnetic resonance imaging; MDCT; Multislice computed tomography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRON BEAMS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; HEART; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RESONANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

CARDIAC FUNCTIONS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EJECTION FRACTION; HEART DISEASE; IMAGES RECONSTRUCTION; LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION; MULTIDETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION; REVIEW;

EID: 33746348959     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200607000-00001     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9064):1498- 1504.
2. Sanz G, Castaner A, Betriu A, et al. Determinants of prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical angiographic study. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(18):1065-1070.
3. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76(1):44-51.
4. Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Dodge HT. Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation. 1979;59(3):421-430.
5. The-Multicenter-Postinfarction-Research-Group. Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:331-336.
6. Buck T, Hunold P, Wentz KU, et al. Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1997;96(12):4286-4297.
7. Qin JX, Johns M, Shiota T, et al. Validation of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for quantifying left ventricular volumes in the presence of a left ventricular aneurysm: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):900-907.
8. Bavelaar-Croon CD, Kayser HW, van der Wall EE, et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology. 2000;217(2):572-575.
9. Mochizuki T, Murase K, Higashino H, et al. Two- and three-dimensional CT ventriculography: a new application of helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(1):203-208.
10. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230(2):403-410.
11. Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2003;38(10):653-661.
12. Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Farmer D, et al. Cardiac imaging with a high-speed Cine-CT Scanner: preliminary results. Radiology. 1984;152(3):579-582.
13. Lipton MJ, Farmer DW, Killebrew EJ, et al. Regional myocardial dysfunction: evaluation of patients with prior myocardial infarction with fast CT. Radiology. 1985;157(3):735-740.
14. Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EA, et al. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology. 1993;187(1):261-268.
15. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21(16):1387-1396.
16. Missouris CG, Forbat SM, Singer DRJ, et al. Echocardiography overestimates left ventricular mass: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 1996;14(8):1005-1010.
17. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(3):552-557.
18. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2001;103(21):2535-2538.
19. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation. 2003;107(5):664-666.
20. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation. 2004;110(17):2638-2643.
21. Dirksen MS, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(10):1157-1160.
22. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP, et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(5):571-574.
23. Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(6):1545-1550.
24. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;234(2):381-390.
25. Mahnken AH, Spuentrup E, Niethammer M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI. Acta Radiol. 2003;44(6):604-611.
26. Sorrentino MJ. Echocardiographic determination of myocardial mass: a review. Am J Physiol Imaging. 1988;3(2):109-113. Review.
27. Kachelriess M, Kalender WA. Electrocardiogram-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond spiral computed tomography scans of the heart. Med Phys. 1998;25(12):2417-2431.
28. Mahnken AH, Spüntrup E, Wildberger JE, et al. Quantification of cardiac function with multislice spiral CT using retrospective EKG-gating: comparison with MRI. Rofo. 2003;175(1):83-88.
29. Halliburton SS, Petersilka M, Schvartzman PR, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2003;19(1):73-83.
30. Koch KE, Oellig F, Kunz P, et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo. 2004;176(12):1786-1793.
31. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(4):714-720.
32. Heuschmid M, Rothfuss J, Schröder S, et al. Left ventricular functional parameters: comparison of 16-slice spiral CT with MRI. Rofo. 2005;177(1):60-66.
33. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;5;46(1):147-154.
34. Greenberg SB, Sandhu SK. Ventricular function. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999;37(2):341-359. vi (Review).
35. Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg , et al. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;1;44(5):1030-1035.
36. Manrique A, Faraggi M, Vera P, et al. 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT in patients with large perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(5):805-809.
37. Slart RHJA, Bax JJ, de Jong RM, et al. Comparison of gated PET with MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(2):176-182.
38. Boyd DP, Lipton MJ. Cardiac computed-tomography. Proc IEEE. 1983;71:298-307.
39. Woo P, Mao S, Wong S, et al. Left ventricular size determined by electron beam computed tomography predicts significant coronary artery disease and events. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79(9):1236-1238.
40. Setser RM, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH. Quantification of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance images acquired in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12(3):430-438.
41. Lipton MJ. Quantitation of cardiac function by cine-CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 1985;23(4):613-626.
42. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, et al. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology. 2001;220(3):712-717.
43. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Kuettner A, et al. Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging. 2002;26(2):106-111.
44. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder P, Higgins CB. Quantification of cardiac function by conventional and cine magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1987;10(6):365-373.
45. Wintersperger BJ, Hundt W, Knez A, et al. Left ventricular systolic function assessed by ECG gated multirow-detector spiral computed tomography (multi-detector row CT): comparison to ventriculography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:S192.
46. Juergens KU, Fischbach R, Grude M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular function by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT in comparison to cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:S191.
47. Ritchie CJ, Godwin JD, Crawford CR, et al. Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT. Radiology. 1992;185(1):37-42.
48. Heuschmid M, Kuttner A, Flohr T, et al. Visualization of coronary arteries in CT as assessed by a new 16 slice technology and reduced gantry rotation time: first experiences. Rofo. 2002;174(6):721-724.
49. Boese JM, Bahner ML, van Kaick G. Optimizing temporal resolution in CT with retrospective ECG gating. Radiologe. 2000;40(2):123-129.
50. Bruder H, Schaller S, Ohnesorge B, et al. High temporal resolution volume heart imaging with multirow computed tomography. SPIE. 1999;3661:420-432.
51. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA. ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. Med Phys. 2000;27(8):1881-1902.
52. Halliburton SS, Boese JM, Flohr TG, et al. Improved volumetric analysis of the left ventricle using cardiac multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) with high temporal resolution image reconstruction. Radiology. 2002;252(P):389.
53. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106(16):2051-2054.
54. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - Initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:331-335.
55. Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, et al. Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. Radiology. 2001;221(3):683-688.
56. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(5):1081-1086.
57. Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Maintz D, et al. Left ventricular function determination with Multidetector-row CT of the heart: are short-axis image reformations necessary? Am J Roentgenol. (in press).
58. Juergens KU, Ozgun M, Maintz D, et al. Analyse der globalenund regionalen linksventrikulären Funktion Mittels 16-Zeilen-Spiral-Computertomographie des Herzens im Vergleich zur MR-Tomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2005;177:S273-278.
59. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Gyen M, et al. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;219(1):264-269.
60. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, et al. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 1999;1(1):7-21.
61. Kivelitz DE, Enzweiler CNH, Wiese TH, et al. Determination of left ventricular function parameters and myocardial mass: comparison of MRI and EBT. Rofo. 2000;172(3):244-250.
62. Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, et al. MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology. 2002;223(1):263-269.
63. Juergens KU, Maintz D, Grude M, et al. Multi-detector row computed tomography of the heart: does a multi-segment reconstruction algorithm improve left ventricular volume measurements? Eur Radiol. 2005;15(1):111-117.
64. Dewey M, Muller M, Teige F, et al. Evaluation of a semiautomatic software tool for left ventricular function analysis with 16-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:25-31.
65. Kim TH, Hur J, Kim SJ, et al. Two-phase reconstruction for the assessment of left ventricular volume and function using retrospective ECG-gated MDCT: comparison with echocardiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(2):319-325.
66. Baik HK, Budoff MJ, Lane KL, et al. Accurate measures of ejection fraction using electron beam tomography, radionuclide angiography, and catheterization angiography. Int J Cardiac Imag. 2000;16:391-398.
67. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;234(2):381-390.
68. Gerber TC, Stratmann BP, Kuzo RS, et al. Effect of acquisition technique on radiation dose and image quality in multidetector row computed tomography coronary angiography with submillimeter collimation. Invest Radiol. 2005;40(8):556-563.