Comparison of gated PET with MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 176-182

  Slart, Riemer H J A ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^b   De Jong, Richard M ^a   De Boer, Jaep ^a   Lamb, Hildo J ^b   Mook, Piet H ^a   Willemsen, Antoon T M ^a   Vaalburg, Willem ^a   Van Veldhuisen, Dirk J ^a   Jager, Pieter L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gated 18F FDG PET; Left ventricular ejection fraction; Left ventricular volumes; MRI; Regional wall motion

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HUMAN; KAPPA STATISTICS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; GATED IMAGING; HEART; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SCINTISCANNING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; GATED BLOOD-POOL IMAGING; HEART; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 1542609234     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PW, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44-51.
2. Starling MR, Crawford MH, Sorensen SG, Levi B, Richards KL, O'Rourke RA. Comparative accuracy of apical biplane cross-sectional echocardiography and gated equilibrium radionuclide angiography for estimating left ventricular size and performance. Circulation. 1981;63:1075-1084.
3. Van der Wall EE, Vliegen HW, De Roos A, Bruschke AV. Magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995;92:2723-2739.
4. Wackers FJ, Berger HJ, Johnstone DE, et al. Multiple gated cardiac blood pool imaging for left ventricular ejection fraction: validation of the technique and assessment of variability. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:1159-1166.
5. Di Carli MF. Predicting improved function after myocardial revascularization. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1998;13:415-424.
6. Tamaki N, Kawamoto M, Tadamura E, et al. Prediction of reversible ischemia after revascularization: perfusion and metabolic studies with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1995;91:1697-1705.
7. Hattori N, Bengel FM, Mehilli J, et al. Global and regional functional measurements with gated FDG PET in comparison with left ventriculography. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:221-229.
8. Waiter GD, Al-Mohammad A, Norton MY, Redpath TW, Welch A, Walton S. Regional myocardial wall thickening assessed at rest by ECG gated (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography and by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart. 2000;84:332-333.
9. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18:363-372.
10. Maruyama A, Hasegawa S, Paul AK, et al. Myocardial viability assessment with gated SPECT Tc-99m tetrofosmin % wall thickening: comparison with F-18 FDG-PET. Ann Nucl Med. 2002;16:25-32.
11. 18F-FDG-PET to optimize recognition of myocardial hibernation. Nucl Med Commun. 1998;19:535-545.
12. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979;237:E214-E223.
13. Knuuti MJ, Nuutila P, Ruotsalainen U, et al. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and oral glucose load in stimulating myocardial glucose utilization during positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1255-1262.
14. Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Berman DS. An automatic approach to the analysis, quantification and review of perfusion and function from myocardial perfusion SPECT images. Int J Card Imaging. 1997;13:337-346.
15. Germano G, Erel J, Lewin H, Kavanagh PB, Berman DS. Automatic quantification of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening from gated technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1360-1367.
16. Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2138-2147.
17. Willemsen ATM, Siebelink HJ, Blanksma PK, Paans AMJ. Automatic ejection fraction determination from gated myocardial FDG-PET data. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:577-582.
18. Van der Geest RJ, Jansen E, Buller VGM, Reiber JHC. Automated detection of left ventricular epi- and endocardial contours in short-axis MR images. Comput Cardiol. 1997;21:33-36.
19. Pattynama PMT, Lamb HJ, Van der Velde EA, Van der Wall EE, De Roos A. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology. 1993;187:261-268.
20. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1981:212-236.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical assessment. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
22. Vaduganathan P, He Z, Vick GW, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with Tc-99m tetrofosmin: a comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;6:3-10.
23. Wright GA, McDade M, Martin W, Hutton I. Quantitative gated SPECT: the effect of reconstruction filter on calculated left ventricular ejection fractions and volumes. Phys Med Biol. 2002;21:N99-N105.
24. Schaefer WM, Lipke CSA, Nowak B, et al. Validation of an evaluation routine for left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and wall motion from gated cardiac FDG PET: a comparison with cardiac resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 2003;30:545-553.
25. Ioannidis JPA, Trikalinos TA, Danias PG. Electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:2059-2068.
26. Rajappan K, Livieratos L, Camici PG, Pennell DJ. Measurement of ventricular volumes and function: a comparison of gated PET and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:806-810.
27. Boyd HL, Gunn RN, Marinho NVS, et al. Non-invasive measurement of left ventricular volumes and function by gated positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:1594-1602.