Portable electronic nose for detection of spoiling alaska pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha)

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Chantarachoti, J ^a   Oliveira, A C M ^a   Himelbloom, B H ^a   Crapo, C A ^a   McLachlan, D G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^b CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electronic nose; Fish spoilage; Pink salmon; Seafood quality

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS GORBUSCHA;

EID: 33746333578     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00050.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alasalvar C, Odabasi AZ, Demir N, Balaban MO, Shahidi F, Cadwallader KR. 2004. Volatiles and flavor of five Turkish hazelnut varieties as evaluated by descriptive sensory analysis, electronic nose, and dynamic headspace analysis/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Food Sci 69(3):SNQ99-106.
2. Alaska Salmon Industry Task Force. 2003. Final Report. Juneau, Alaska.
3. Anonymous. 2001. The Cyranose 320 electronic nose: user's manual. 4th ed. Calif.: Cyrano Science, Inc. p 94.
4. [ASMI] Alaska Seafood Marketing Inst. 2004. Color evaluation guide for Pacific salmon II. Juneau, Alaska. Available from 〈http://www. alaskaseafood.org/fishingprocessing/quality.htm〉. Accessed Aprils, 2006.
5. di Natale C, Brunink JA, Bungaro F, Davide F, d'Amico A, Paolesse R, Boschi T, Faccio M, Ferri G. 1996. Recognition of fish storage time by a metalloporphyrins coated QMB sensor array. Meas Sci Technol 7:1103-14.
6. Du WX, Kim J, Cornell JA, Huang T, Marshall M, Wei CI. 2001. Microbiological, sensory, and electronic nose evaluation of yellow-fin tuna under various storage conditions. J Food Protect 64(12):2027-36.
7. Du WX, Lin CM, Huang T, Kim J, Marshall M, Wei CI. 2002. Potential application of the electronic nose for quality assessment of salmon fillets under various storage conditions. J Food Sci 67(1):307-13.
8. Girard B, Nakai S. 1994. Grade classification of canned pink salmon with static headspace volatile patterns. J Food Sci 59(3):507-12.
9. Gram L, Huss HH. 1996. Microbiological spoilage offish and fish products. Int J Food Microbiol 33:121-37.
10. Gram L, Huss HH. 2000. Fresh and processed fish and shellfish. In: Lund BM, Baird-Parker TC, Gould GW, editors. The microbiological safety and quality of food. Md.: Aspen Publ., Inc. Vol 1. p 472-506.
11. Himelbloom BH, Brown EK, Lee JS. 1991. Microorganisms on commercially processed Alaskan finfish. J Food Sci 56:1279-81.
12. Himelbloom BH, Crapo C, Brown EK, Babbitt J, Reppond K. 1994. Pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) quality during ice and chilled seawater storage. J Food Qual 17:197-210.
13. Korel F, Luzuriaga DA, Balaban MO. 2001a. Objective quality assessment of raw tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets using electronic nose and machine vision. J Food Sci 66(7):1018-24.
14. Korel F, Luzuriaga DA, Balaban MO. 2001b. Quality evaluation of raw and cooked catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) using electronic nose and machine vision. J Aqua Food ProdTechnol 10(1):3-17.
15. Luzuriaga DA, Balaban MO. 1999. Electronic nose odor evaluation of salmon fillets at different temperatures. In: Hurst WJ, editor. Electronic noses & sensor array based systems-design and applications. Pennsylvania: Technomic Publ. Co. p 162-69.
16. Martinsdóttir E, Sveinsdóttir K, Luten J, Schelvis-Smit R, Hyldig G. 2001. Sensory evaluation offish freshness. Reference manual for the fish sector. Reykjavik: QIM Eurofish. p 49.
17. Olafsdottir G, Fleurence J. 1998. Evaluation of fish freshness using volatile compounds classification of volatile compounds in fish. In: Olafsdottir G, Luten J, Dalgaard P, Creche M, Verrez-Bagins V, Matrinsdottir E, Heia K, editors. Methods to determine the freshness of fish in research and industries. Paris: Intl. Inst. of Refrigeration. p 55-69.
18. Olafsdottir G, Xiuchen L, Lauzon H, Jonsdottir R. 2002. Precision and application of electronic nose for freshness monitoring of whole redfish stored in ice and modified atmosphere bulk storage. J Aqua Food Prod Technol 11:229-49.
19. Olafsdottir G, Chaine E, Westad F, Jonsdottir R, Thalmann CR, Bazzo S, Labreche S, Marcq P, Lundby F, Haugen JE. 2005. Prediction of microbial and sensory quality of cold smoked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by electronic nose. J Food Sci 70(9):S563-74.
20. Oliveira ACM, Crapo CA, Himelbloom B, Vorholt C, Hoffert J. 2005. Headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose analysis of volatile compounds in canned Alaska pink salmon having various grades of watermarking. J Food Sci 70(7):S419-26.
21. Shewan JM, Macintosh RG, Tucker CG, Ehrenberg ASC. 1953. The development of a numerical scoring system for the sensory assessment of the spoilage of wet white fish stored in ice. J Sci Food Agric 4:283-98.
22. Tretsven WI. 1965. Bacteriological survey of filleting process in the Pacific Northwest. IV. Bacterial counts of fish fillets and equipment. J Milk Food Tech 28:287-91.
23. Van Deventer D, Mallikarjunan P. 2002. Comparative performance analysis of three electronic nose systems using different sensor technologies in odor analysis of retained solvents on printed packaging. J Food Sci 67(8):3170-83.
24. Vazquez MJ, Lorenzo RA, Cela R. 2003. The use of an 'electronic nose' device to monitor the ripening process of anchovies. Int J Food Sci Tech 38:273-84.