Abundance and co-occurrence patterns of core and satellite species of ground beetles on small lake islands

Oikos

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 338-348

  Ulrich, Werner ^a   Zalewski, Marcin ^b  

^a NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BEETLE; COEXISTENCE; DISPERSAL; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; MAMRY LAKE; POLAND; WARMINSKO-MAZURSKIE;

CARABIDAE; COLEOPTERA;

EID: 33746327744     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14773.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Azeria, E. T. 2004. Community dynamics of insular biotas in space and time. - Thesis, Univ. Uppsala, Sweden.
2. Banavar, J. R., Green, J. L., Harte, J. et al. 1999. Finite size scaling in ecology. - Phys. Rev. Lett. 83: 4212-4214.
3. Bell, G. 2001. Neutral macroecology. - Science 293: 2413-2418.
4. Bell, G. 2005. The co-distribution of species in relation to the neutral theory of community ecology. - Ecology 86: 1757-1770.
5. Brose, U., Martinez, N. D. and Williams, R. J. 2003. Estimating species richness: sensitivity to sample coverage and insensitivity to spatial patterns. - Ecology 84: 2364-2377.
6. Burnham, K. P. and Overton, W. S. 1978. Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. - Biometrika 65: 623-633.
7. Butler, M. A. and King, A. A. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. - Am. Nat. 164: 683-695.
8. Connolly, S. R., Hughes, T. P., Bellwood, D. R. et al. 2005. Community structure of corals and reef fishes at multiple scales. - Science 309: 1363-1365.
9. Connor, E. F. and Simberloff, D. 1979. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition. - Ecology 60: 1132-1140.
10. Den Boer, J. P., van Huizen, T. H. P., den Boer-Daanje, W. et al. 1980. Wing polymorphism and dimorphism in ground beetles as stages in an evolutionary process (Coleoptera, Carabidae). - Entomol. Genet. 6: 107-134.
11. Diamond, J. M. 1975. Assembly of species communities. - In: Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M. (eds), Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard Univ. Press, pp. 342-444.
12. Digweed, S. C., Currie, C. R., Carcamo, H. A. et al. 1995. Digging out the 'digging - in effect' of pitfall traps: influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Col., Carabidae). - Pedobiol. 39: 561-576.
13. Dolman, A. M. and Blackburn, T. M. 2004. A comparison of random draw and locally neutral models for the avifauna of an English woodland. - BMC Biol. 4: 8.
14. Fesl, C. 2002. Niche-orientated species-abundance models: different approaches of their application to larval chironomid (Diptera) assemblages in a large river. - J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 1085-1094.
15. Fisher, A. G., Corbet, S. A. and Williams, S. A. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. - J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42-58.
16. Gaston, K. J. 1994. Rarity. - Chapman and Hall.
17. Gaston, K. J. and Blackburn, T. M. 2000. Pattern and process in macroecology. - Blackwell.
18. Gotelli, N. J. 2000. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. - Ecology 81: 2606-2621.
19. Gotelli, N. J. 2001. Research frontiers in null model analysis. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 10: 337-343.
20. Gotelli, N. J. and Graves, G. R. 1996. Null models in ecology. - Smiths. Inst. Press.
21. Gotelli, N. J. and McCabe, D. 2002. Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond's assembly rules model. - Ecology 83: 2091-2096.
22. Gotelli, N. J. and Entsminger, G. L. 2005. EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 7.72. - Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear.
23. Guo, Q., Brown, J. H. and Valone, R. J. 2000. Abundance and distribution of desert annuals: are spatial and temporal patterns related? - J. Ecol. 88: 551-560.
24. Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. - Oikos 38: 210-221.
25. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. - J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151-162.
26. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
27. Hanski, I. and Gyllenberg, M. 1993. Two general metapopulation models and the core-satellite species hypothesis. - Am. Nat. 142: 17-41.
28. Harte, J., Kinzig, A. P. and Green, J. 1999. Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species. - Science 284: 334-336.
29. Harte, J., Conlisk, E., Ostling, A. et al. 2005. A theory of spatial-abundance and species-abundance distributions in ecological communities at multiple spatial scales. - Ecol. Monogr. 75: 179-197.
30. Heck, K. L., van Belle, G. and Simberloff, D. 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. - Ecology 56: 1459-1461.
31. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified theory of biogeography and biodiversity. - Princeton Univ. Press.
32. Hürka, K. 1996. Carabidae of the Czech and the Slovak Republics. - Karabourek.
33. Hutchinson, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why there are so many kinds of animals. - Am. Nat. 93: 145-159.
34. Kilpatrick, A. M. and Ives, A. R. 2003. Species interactions can explain Taylor's power law for ecological time series. - Nature 422: 65-68.
35. Knouft, J. H. 2003. Convergence, divergence, and the effect of congeners on body size ratios in stream fishes. - Evolution 57: 2374-2382.
36. Kotze, D. J., Niemelä, J., O'Hara, R. B. et al. 2003. Testing abundance-range size relationships in European carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Ecography 26: 553-566.
37. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. - Harper Collins.
38. Kunin, W. E. and Gaston, K. J. (eds) 1997. The biology of rarity. - Chapman and Hall.
39. Lindroth, C. H. 1985. The Carabidae (Col.) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. - Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, Scand. Sci. Press.
40. Loreau, M. 1990. Competition in a carabid beetle community. - Oikos 58: 25-38.
41. Loreau, M. 1992. Spcies abundance patterns and the structure of ground beetle communities. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 28: 49-56.
42. Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. - Blackwell.
43. Magurran, A. E. and Henderson, P. A. 2003. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. - Nature 422: 714-716.
44. May, R. M. 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. - In: Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M. (eds), Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap, pp. 81-120.
45. McGeoch, M. A. and Gaston, K. J. 2002. Occupancy frequency distributions: patterns, artefacts and mechanisms. - Biol. Rev. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 77: 311-331.
46. McGill, B. J. 2003. Does Mother Nature really prefer rare species or are log-left-skewed SADs a sampling artefact? - Ecol. Lett. 6: 766-773.
47. Miklós, I. and Podani, J. 2004. Randomization of presence - absence matrices: comments and new algorithms. - Ecology 85: 86-92.
48. Moulliot, D., Lepretre, A., Andrei-Ruiz, M. C. et al. 2000. The fractal model: a new model to describe the species accumulation process and relative abundance distribution (RAD). - Oikos 90: 333-342.
49. Nee, S., Gregory, R. D. and May, R. M. 1991a. Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts. - Oikos 62: 83-87.
50. Nee, S., Harvey, P. H. and May, R. M. 1991b. Lifting the veil on abundance patterns. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 243: 161-163.
51. Niemelä, J. 1993. Interspecific competition in ground beetle assemblages (Carabidae): what have we learned? - Oikos 66: 325-335.
52. Novotny, V. and Drozd, P. 2001. Sampling error can cause false rejection of the core-satellite species hypothesis. - Oecologia 126: 360-362.
53. Peres-Neto, P. R. 2004. Patterns in the co-occurrence of fish species in streams: the role of site suitability, morphology and phylogeny versus species interactions. - Oecologia 140: 352-360.
54. Pielou, D. P. and Pielou, E. C. 1968. Association among species of infrequent occurrence: the insect and spider fauna of Polyporus betulinus (Bulliard) Fries. - J. Theor. Biol. 21: 202-216.
55. Preston, F. W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Part I and II. - Ecology : 185-215
56. Ecology : 43: 410-432.
57. Sanderson, J. G., Moulton, M. P. and Selfridge, R. G. 1998. Null matrices and the analysis of species co-occurrences. - Oecologia 116: 275-283.
58. Schluter, D. 1984. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications. - Ecology 65: 998-1005.
59. Selmi, S. and Boulinier, T. 2004. Distribution-abundance relationship for passerines breeding in Tunisian oases: test of the sampling hypothesis. - Oecologia 139: 440-445.
60. Siemann, E. and Brown, J. H. 1999. Gaps in mammalian body size distributions re-examined. - Ecology 80: 2788-2792.
61. Simberloff, D. S. and Boecklen, W. 1981. Santa Rosalia reconsidered: size ratios and competition. - Evolution 35: 1206-1228.
62. Solé, R. and Alonso, D. 1998. Random walks, fractals and the origins of rainforest diversity. - Adv. Complex Syst. E 62: 8466-8484.
63. Stone, L. and Roberts, A. 1990. The checkerboard score and species distributions. - Oecologia 85: 74-79.
64. Storch, D. and Šizling, A. 2002. Patterns of commonness and rarity in Central European birds: reliability of the core-satellite hypothesis within a large scale. - Ecography 25: 405-416.
65. Sugihara, G. 1980. Minimal community structure: an explanation of species abundance patterns. - Am. Nat. 116: 770-787.
66. Taylor, L. R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. - Nature 332: 721-722.
67. Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P. and Perry, J. N. 1980. Variance and the large scale spatial stability of aphids, moths and birds. - J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 831-854.
68. Tokeshi, M. 1990. Niche apportionment or random assortment: species abundance patterns revisited. - J. Anim. Ecol. 59: 1129-1146.
69. Tokeshi, M. 1992. Dynamics and distribution in animal communities; theory and analysis. - Res. Popul. Ecol. 34: 249-273.
70. Tokeshi, M. 1999. Species coexistence. - Blackwell.
71. Ulrich, W. 2002. RAD - a FORTRAN program for the study of relative abundance distributions. - www.uni.torun.pl/∼ulrichw.
72. Ulrich, W. 2004a. Species co-occurrences and neutral models: reassessing J. M. Diamond's assembly rules. - Oikos 107: 603-609.
73. Ulrich, W. 2004b. Neutral macroecology - ecology without biology? - Ecol. Quest. 4: 113-126.
74. Ulrich, W. 2005a. ComStruc - a FORTRAN program for comparing ecological communities. - www.uni.torun.pl/∼ulrichw.
75. Ulrich, W. 2005b. Structure - a FORTRAN program for ecological pattern analysis. - www.uni.torun.pl/∼ulrichw.
76. Ulrich, W. and Ollik, M. 2004. Frequent and occasional species and the shape of relative abundance distributions. - Div. Distr. 10: 263-269.
77. Weiher, E. and Keddy, P. A. (eds) 1999. Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
78. Zalewski, M. 2000. Colonization, extinction and species richness of ground beetles (Carabidae, Coleoptera) on Islands of Mazurian lakes. - Thesis.
79. Zalewski, M. 2004. Do smaller islands host younger populations? A case study on metapopulations of three carabid species. - J. Biogeogr. 31: 1139-1148.