Traumatic homonymous hemianopia

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 986-988

  Bruce, B B ^a   Zhang, X ^b   Kedar, S ^b   Newman, N J ^b   Biousse, Valérie ^b,c  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c EMORY EYE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FALLING; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HOMONYMOUS HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NEUROIMAGING; OPTIC TRACT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VIOLENCE; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; ADOLESCENT; AGED; BRAIN INJURY; CHILD; HEMIANOPIA; MIDDLE AGED; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 33746310056     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: 1468330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.088799     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Van Stavern GP, Biousse V, Lynn MJ, et al. Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of head trauma. J Neuroophthalmol 2001;21:112-7.
2. Gianutsos R, Ramsey G, Perlin RR. Rehabilitative optometric services for survivors of acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:573-78.
3. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Visual function, driving safety, and the elderly. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1180-8.
4. Savir H, Michelson I, David C, et al. Homonymous hemianopsia and rehabilitation in fifteen cases of C.C.I. Scand J Rehabil Med 1977;9:151-3.
5. Zihl J. Eye movement patterns in hemianopic dyslexia. Brain 1995;118:891-912.
6. Zhang X, Kedar S, Lynn MJ, et al. Evaluation of 904 homonymous hemianopias. Neurology 2006;66:906-10.
7. Trobe JD. Visual fields. In: Trobe JD, ed. The neurology of vision. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001:109-39.
8. Pambakian A, Currie J, Kennard C. Rehabilitation strategies for patients with homonymous visual field defects. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 2005;25:136-42.
9. Fujino T, Kigazawa K, Yamada R. Homonymous hemianopia: a retrospective study of 140 cases. Neuro-Opthalmology 1986;6:17-21.
10. Smith JL. Homonymous hemianopia: a review of one hundred cases. Am J Ophthalmol 1962;54:616-23.
11. Trobe JD, Lorber ML, Schlezinger NS. Isolated homonymous hemianopia: a review of 104 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;89:377-81.
12. Heinen M, Hall MJ, Boudreault MA, et al. National trends in injury hospitalizations, 1979-2001. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2005.
13. McKinnon J. The Black population: 2000. Census 2000 brief. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, 2001.
14. Uzzell, BP, Dolinskas CA, Langfitt TW. Visual field defects in relation to head injury severity: a neuropsychological study. Arch Neurol 1988;45:420-24.
15. Celesia GG, Brigell MG, Vaphiades MS. Hemianopic anosognosia. Neurology 1997;49:88-97.
16. Kerkhoff G. Restorative and compensatory therapy approaches in cerebral blindness - a review. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1999;15:255-71.
17. Szatmary G, Biousse V, Newman NJ. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to Goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice? Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1162-73.
18. Wall M, Johnson CA. Principles and techniques of the examination of the visual sensory system. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, Biousse V, Kerrisson J, eds. Walsh and Hoyt clinical neuro-ophthalmology. 6th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2005:83-149.
19. Wang AM, Sharpe JA. A comparison of tangent screen, Goldmann, and Humphrey perimetry in the detection and location of occipital lesions. Ophthalmology 2000;107:527-44.
20. Gray CS, French JM, Bates D, et al. Recovery of visual fields in acute stroke: homonymous hemianopia associated with adverse prognosis. Age Ageing 1989;18:419-21.
21. Zhang X, Kedar S, Lynn MJ, et al. Natural history of homonymous hemianopia. Neurology 2006;66:901-5.