Hemianopic anosognosia

Neurology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 88-97

  Celesia, Gastone G ^a   Brigell, Mitchell G ^a   Vaphiades, Michael S ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANOSOGNOSIA; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; FEMALE; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY DISORDER; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 0030842420     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.49.1.88     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Babinski J. Contribution a l'etude des troubles mentaux dans l'hemiplegie organique cerebrale. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1914;28: 845-848.
2. Anton G. Ueber die Selbstwahrnehmung der herderkrankungen des gehirns durch den kranken bein rindenblindheit und rindentubheit. Arch Psychiatr 1899;32:86-127.
3. Gassel M, Williams D. Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopia. III. The completion phenomenon: insight and attitude to the defect; and visual, function efficiency. Brain 1963;86:229-260.
4. Warrington EK. The completion of visual forms across hemianopic field defects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1962;25: 208-217.
5. Levine D. Unawareness of visual and sensorimotor defects: a hypothesis. Brain Cogn 1990;13:233-281.
6. Gerstmann J. Problem of imperception of disease and of impaired body territories with organic lesions. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 1942;48:890-913.
7. Roth M. Disorders of the body image caused by lesions of the right parietal lobe. Brain 1949;72:89-111.
8. Weinstein EA, Kahn RL. Denial of illness: symbolic and psychological aspects. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas, 1955.
9. Vaphiades MS, Celesia GG, Brigell MG. Positive spontaneous visual phenomena limited to the hemianopic field in lesions of central visual pathways. Neurology 1996;47:408-417.
10. Folstein MF, Folstein SW, McHugh PR. Minimental state. A practical method of grading the cognitive state of the patient for the physician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198.
11. Benton AL. Benton Revised Visual Retention Test. 4th ed. San Antonio, TX: Physiological Corp., 1974.
12. Critchley M. The problem of awareness or non-awareness of hemianopic field defects. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1949;69: 95-109.
13. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgard: Thieme Verlag, 1988.
14. Critchley M. Clinical investigation of disease of the parietal lobes of the brain. Med Clin North Am 1962;46:837-858.
15. Koehler PJ, Endtz LJ, Te Velde J, Hekster RE. Aware or non-aware. On the significance of awareness for the localization of the lesion responsible for homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Sci 1986;75:255-262.
16. Wurtz RH, Goldberg ME, Robinson DL. Brain mechanisms of visual attention. Sci Am 1982;246:124-135.
17. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlaying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 1979;5:166-170.
18. Mesulam MM. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 1981;10:309-325.
19. Heilman KM. Performance on hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome. Neurology 1983;33:661-664.
20. Husian M. Is visual neglect body-centric? J Neurol Neursurg Psychiatry 1995;58:262-263.
21. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 1992;28:525-535.
22. Stone SP, Halligan PW, Greenwood RJ. The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age Aging 1993;22:46-52.
23. Breier JI, Adair JC, Gold M, Fennell EB, Gilmore RL, Heilman KM. Dissociation of anosognosia for hemiplegia and aphasia during left-hemisphere anesthesia. Neurology 1995; 45:65-67.
24. Bisiach E, Vallar G, Perani D, Papagno C, Berti A. Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopsia. Neuropsychologia 1986;24:471-482.
25. Dufour M. Sur la vision nulle dans l'hemianopsie. Rev Med Suisse Romande 1889;9:445-451.
26. Rafal R, Robertson L. The neurology of visual attention. In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995:625-648.
27. Ungerleider LG. Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory. Science 1995;270:769-775.
28. Maunsell JHR. The brain's visual world: representation of visual target in cerebral cortex. Science 1995;270:764-769.
29. Roland PE, Gulyas B. Visual memory, visual imagery and visual recognition of large field patterns by the human brain: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Cereb Cortex 1995;1:79-93.
30. Mesulam MM. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 1981;4:309-325.
31. Seeck M, Schomer D, Mainwaring N, et al. Selectively distributed processing of visual object recognition in the temporal and frontal lobes of the human brain. Ann Neurol 1995;37: 538-545.
32. Ramachandran VS, Gregory RL. Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision. Nature 1991;350: 699-702.
33. Prigatano GP, Altman IM. Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;13:1058-1064.