Dynamic auditory processing, musical experience and language development

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 382-390

  Tallal, Paula ^a   Gaab, Nadine ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; DYSLEXIA; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LEARNING DISORDER; MUSIC; NEUROBIOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TRAINING;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MUSIC; REMEDIAL TEACHING; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33746301965     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.06.003     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Beitchman J.H., et al. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children with speech and language disorders. J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiatry 25 (1986) 528-535
2. Catts H.W., et al. A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45 (2002) 1142-1157
3. Bishop D.V., and Snowling M.J. Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different?. Psychol. Bull. 130 (2004) 858-886
4. Snow C.E., et al. Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children (1998), National Academy Press
5. Fitch R.H., and Tallal P. Neural mechanisms of language-based learning impairments: insights from human populations and animal models. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 2 (2003) 155-178
6. Farmer M.E., and Klein R.M. The evidence for a temporal processing deficit liked to dyslexia: a review. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 2 (1995) 460-493
7. Tallal P. Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5 (2004) 721-728
8. Livingstone M.S., et al. Physiological and anatomical evidence for magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88 (1991) 7943-7947
9. Stein J. The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia 7 (2001) 12-36
10. Kuhl P.K., et al. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255 (1992) 606-608
11. Recanzone G.H., et al. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13 (1993) 87-104
12. Zhang L.I., et al. Disruption of primary auditory cortex by synchronous auditory inputs during a critical period. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 2309-2314
13. Orduna I., et al. Spectrotemporal sensitivities in rat auditory cortical neurons. Hear. Res. 160 (2001) 47-57
14. Hebb D.O. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory (1949), Wiley
15. Rao R.P., and Sejnowski T.J. Self-organizing neural systems based on predictive learning. Philos. Transact. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361 (2003) 1149-1175
16. Sejnowski T. The book of Hebb. Neuron 24 (1999) 773-776
17. Stark R., and Tallal P. Analysis of stop consonant production errors in developmentally dysphasic children. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66 (1979) 1703-1712
18. Tallal P., and Stark R. Speech acoustic cue discrimination abilities of normally developing and language impaired children. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69 (1981) 568-574
19. Breier J.I., et al. Perception of voice and tone onset time continua in children with dyslexia with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 80 (2001) 245-270
20. Fiez J., et al. PET studies of auditory and phonological processing: effects of stimulus type and task condition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 7 (1995) 357-375
21. Joanisse M.F., and Gati J.S. Overlapping neural regions for processing rapid temporal cues in speech and nonspeech signals. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 64-79
22. Johnsrude I.S., et al. Left-hemisphere specialization for the processing of acoustic transients. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 1761-1765
23. Temple E., et al. Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: evidence from fMRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 (2000) 13907-13912
24. Belin P., et al. Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10 (1998) 536-540
25. Zaehle T., et al. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20 (2004) 2447-2456
26. Zatorre R.J. Sound analysis in auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci. 26 (2003) 229-230
27. Bailey P.J., and Snowling M.J. Auditory processing and the development of language and literacy. Br. Med. Bull. 63 (2003) 135-146
28. Chiappe P., et al. Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults. Read. Writ. 15 (2002) 73-107
29. McArthur G.M., and Bishop D.V. Auditory perceptual processing in people with reading and oral language impairments: current issues and recommendations. Dyslexia 7 (2001) 150-170
30. Mody M., et al. Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 64 (1997) 199-231
31. Ramus F. Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction?. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 (2003) 212-218
32. Rosen S., and Manganari E. Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia?. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44 (2001) 720-736
33. Tallal P., and Piercy M. Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature 241 (1973) 468-469
34. Tallal P., and Piercy M. Developmental dysphasia: the perception of brief vowels and extended stop consonants. Neuropsychologia 13 (1975) 69-74
35. Denenberg V.H. A critique of Mody, Studdert-Kennedy, and Brady's 'Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding?'. J. Learn. Disabil. 32 (1999) 379-383
36. Thomas M., and Karmiloff-Smith A. Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modeling. Behav. Brain Sci. 25 (2002) 727-750
37. McArthur G.M., and Bishop D.V. Which people with specific language impairment have auditory processing deficits?. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 21 (2004) 79-94
38. Bishop D.V.M., and McArthur M. Immature cortical responses to auditory stimuli in specific language impairment: evidence from ERPs to rapid tone sequences. Dev. Sci. 7 (2004) 11-18
39. Bishop D.V.M., and McArthur M. Individual differences in auditory processing in specific language impairment: a follow-up study using event-related potentials and behavioural thresholds. Cortex 41 (2005) 327-341
40. Benasich A.A., and Tallal P. Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behav. Brain Res. 136 (2002) 31-49
41. Benasich A.A., et al. The infant as a prelinguistic model for language learning impairments: predicting from event-related potentials to behavior. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 396-411
42. Friederici A.D. The developmental cognitive neuroscience of language: a new research domain. Brain Lang. 71 (2000) 65-68
43. Leppanen P.H., et al. Brain responses to changes in speech sound duration differ between infants with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Dev. Neuropsychol. 22 (2002) 407-422
44. Lyytinen H., et al. The development of children at familial risk for dyslexia: birth to early school age. Ann. Dyslexia 54 (2004) 184-220
45. Molfese D.L. Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses. Brain Lang. 72 (2000) 238-245
46. Friedrich M., et al. Electrophysiological evidence for delayed mismatch response in infants at-risk for specific language impairment. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 772-782
47. Leppanen P.H., and Lyytinen H. Auditory event-related potentials in the study of developmental language-related disorders. Audiol. Neurootol. 2 (1997) 308-340
48. Leppanen P.H., et al. Cortical responses of infants with and without genetic risk for dyslexia: II. Group effects. NeuroReport 10 (1999) 969-973
49. Merzenich M., et al. Temporal processing deficits of language learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 271 (1996) 77-81
50. Tallal P., et al. Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 271 (1996) 81-84
51. Troia A., and Whitney S. A close look at the efficacy of Fast ForWord Language for children with academic weaknesses. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 28 (2003) 465-494
52. Gillam R.B. Computer-assisted language intervention using Fast ForWord: theoretical and empirical considerations for clinical decision-making. Lang. Speech Hear. Serv. Sch. 30 (1999) 363-370
53. Gillam R.B., et al. Language change following computer-assisted language instruction with Fast ForWord or Laureate Learning Systems software. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 10 (2001) 231-247
54. Gillam R.B., et al. Looking back: A summary of five exploratory studies of Fast ForWord. Am. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 10 (2001) 269-273
55. Hook P.E., et al. Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties - a longitudinal study. Ann. Dyslexia LI (2001) 75-96
56. Gillingham, A. and Stillman, B.W. (1997). The Gillingham Manual: Remedial Training for Students with Specific Disability in Reading, Spelling and Penmanship. Educators Publishing Service, Inc
57. Temple E. Brain mechanisms in normal and dyslexic readers. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12 (2002) 178-183
58. Temple E., et al. Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 2860-2865
59. Tremblay K.L., and Kraus N. Auditory training induced asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45 (2002) 564-572
60. Shaywitz B.A., et al. Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after phonologically-based intervention. Biol. Psychiatry 55 (2004) 926-933
61. Agnew J., et al. Effect of intensive training on auditory processing and reading skills. Brain Lang. 88 (2004) 21-25
62. Cohen W., et al. Effects of computer-based intervention through acoustically modified speech (FastForWord) in severe mixed receptive-expressive language impairment: outcomes from a randomized control trial. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 48 (2005) 715-729
63. Peretz I., and Zatorre R. Brain organization for music processing. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56 (2005) 89-114
64. Trainor L.J., et al. Effects of musical training on the auditory cortex in children. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 999 (2003) 506-513
65. Hetland L. Learning to make music enhances spatial reasoning. J. Aesthet. Educ. 34 (2000) 179-238
66. Schellenberg E.G. Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychol. Sci. 15 (2004) 511-514
67. Hassler M., et al. Musical talent and visual-spatial ability: a longitudinal study. Psychol. Music 13 (1985) 99-113
68. Gardiner M.F., et al. Learning improved by arts training. Nature 381 (1996) 284
69. Barwick J., et al. Relations between reading and musical abilities. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 59 (1989) 253-257
70. Anvari S.H., et al. Relations among musical skills, phonological processing, and early reading ability in preschool children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 83 (2002) 111-130
71. Standley J.M., and Huges J.E. Evaluation of an early intervention music curriculum for enhancing prereading/writing skills. Music Ther. Perspect. 15 (1997) 79-85
72. Overy K. Dyslexia and music. From timing deficits to musical intervention. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 999 (2003) 497-505
73. Chan A.S., et al. Music training improves verbal memory. Nature 396 (1998) 128
74. Ho Y., et al. Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations in children. Neuropsychology 17 (2003) 439-450
75. Gaab N., et al. Neural correlates of rapid spectro-temporal processing in musicians and nonmusicians. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1060 (2005) 82-88
76. Norton A., et al. Are there pre-existing neural, cognitive, or motoric markers for musical ability?. Brain Cogn. 59 (2005) 124-134
77. Schellenberg G.E. Music and cognitive abilities. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci 14 (2005) 317-320
78. Zatorre R.J., et al. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 37-46