Stereo-slant adaptation is high level and does not involve disparity coding

Journal of Vision

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 71-80

  Berends, Ellen M ^a   Liu, Baoxia ^b   Schor, Clifton M ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; After effects; Binocular vision; Disparity; HSR; Stereo slant; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PREDICTION; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 27344449298     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/5.1.7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adams, W. J., Banks, M. S., & van Ee, R. (2001). Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4(11), 1063-1064.
2. Backus, B. T., Banks, M. S., van Ee, R., & Crowell, J. A. (1999). Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception, Vision Research, 39(6), 1143-1170.
3. Balch, W., Milewski, A., & Yonas, A. (1977). Mechanisms underlying the slant aftereffect. Perception and Psychophysics, 21(6), 581-585.
4. Berends, E. M., & Erkelens, C. J. (2001). Adaptation to disparity but not to perceived depth. Vision Research, 41, 883-892.
5. Bergman, R., & Gibson, J. J. (1959). The negative aftereffect of the perception of a surface slanted in the third dimension. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 364-374.
6. Blakemore, C., & Julesz, B. (1971). Stereoscopic depth aftereffect produced without monocular cues. Science, 171, 286-288.
7. Bradshaw, M. F., Glennerster, A., & Rogers, B. J. (1996). The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues. Vision Research, 36(9), 1255-1264.
8. Burian, H. M. (1943). Influence of prolonged wearing of meridional size lenses on spatial localization. Archives of Ophthalmology, 30, 645-666.
9. Burian, H. M., & Ogle, K. N. (1945). Aniseikonia and spatial orientation. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 28, 735-743.
10. Domini, F., Adams, W., & Banks, M. S. (2001). 3D aftereffects are due to shape and not disparity adaptation. Vision Research, 41(21), 2733-2739.
11. Duke, P. A., & Wilcox, L. M. (2003). Adaptation to vertical disparity induced-depth: Implications for disparity processing. Vision Research, 43(2), 135-147.
12. Epstein, W. (1972). Adaptation to uniocular image magnification: Is the underlying shift proprioceptive? Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 89-91.
13. Epstein, W., & Morgan, C. L. (1970). Adaptation to uniocular magnification: Modification of the disparity-depth relationship. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 322-329.
14. Graham, M., & Rogers, B. (1982). Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in the perception of depth from motion-parallax and stereoscopic information. Perception, 11(3), 247-262.
15. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35(3), 389-412.
16. Long, N., & Over, R. (1973). Stereoscopic depth aftereffects with random-dot patterns. Vision Research, 13, 1283-1287.
17. Mack, A., & Chitayat, D. (1970). Eye-dependent and disparity adaptation to opposite visual-field rotations. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 352-371.
18. Miles, P. W. (1948). A comparison of aniseikonic test instruments and prolonged induction of artificial aniseikonia. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 31, 687-696.
19. Mitchell, D. E., & Baker, A. G. (1973). Stereoscopic aftereffects: Evidence for disparity-specific neurones in the human visual system. Vision Research, 13, 2273-2288.
20. Ogle, K. N. (1950). Researches in binocular vision. Philadelphia, London: W.B. Saunders Co.
21. Poom, L., & Borjesson, E. (1999). Perceptual depth synthesis in the visual system as revealed by selective adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 504-517.
22. Rogers, B. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (1995). Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces. Perception, 24, 155-179.
23. Ryan, C., & Gillam, B. (1993). A proximity-contingent stereoscopic depth aftereffect: Evidence for adaptation to disparity gradients. Perception, 22(4), 403-418.
24. Snoeren, P. R., & Puts, M. J. H. (1997). Multiple parameter estimation in an adaptive psychometric method: MUEST, an extension of the quest method. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 431-439.
25. Stevenson, S. B., Cormack, L. K., Schor, C. M., & Tyler, C. W. (1992). Disparity tuning in mechanisms of human stereopsis. Vision Research, 32(9), 1685-1694.
26. Van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (1998). Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: An evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory. Vision Research, 38, 3871-3882.
27. Verstraten, F. A., Verlinde, R., Fredericksen, R. E., & van de Grind, W. A. (1994). A transparent motion aftereffect contingent on binocular disparity. Perception, 23(10), 1181-1188.