Standards-based evaluation and teacher career satisfaction: A structural equation modeling analysis

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-65

  Conley, Sharon ^a   Muncey, Donna E ^b   You, Sukkyung ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California Santa Barbara ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Career Satisfaction; Standards based evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746253685     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-006-9008-1     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D. (1992). Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers: Preservice and Inservice Applications. New York: Longman.
2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, 411-423.
3. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A.
4. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). AMOS User's Guide. Chicago, Illinois: SmallWaters Corporation.
6. Bacharach, S. B., & Mitchell, S. (1982). Organizations and Expectations: Organizational Determinants of Union Membership Demands. In D. B. Lipsky (Ed.), Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI.
7. Bacharach, S. B., Bauer, S. C., & Conley, S. (1986). Organizational analysis of stress: the case of elementary and secondary schools. Work and Occupations 13(1), 7-32.
8. Beehr, T. A. (1995). Psychological Stress in the Workplace. Routledge: London.
9. Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations 38(6), 551-571.
10. Breaugh, J. A. (1999). Further investigation of the work autonomy scales: two studies. Journal of Business and Psychology 13(3), 357-373.
11. Breaugh, J. A., & Becker, A. S. (1987). Further Examination of the Work Autonomy Scales: Three Studies. Human Relations 40(6), 381-400.
12. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (1997). California Standards for the Teaching Profession. Sacramento, California: California Department of Education.
13. Conley, S., & Woosley, S. (2000). Teacher role stress, higher order needs and work outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration 38(2), 179-201.
14. Conley, S. C., Bacharach, S. B., & Bauer, S. (1989). The school work environment and teacher career dissatisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly 25(1), 58-81.
15. Conley, S., Bas-Isaac, E., & Brandon, J. (1998). What matters to whom: predictors of teacher satisfaction in career development plans. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 299-322.
16. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods 1, 16-29.
17. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
18. Glasman, N. S., & Paulin, P. J. (1982). Possible determinants of teacher receptivity to evaluation. The Journal of Educational Administration 20(2), 148-171.
19. Greller, M. M., & Parsons, C. K. (1992). Feedback and feedback inconsistency as sources of strain and self-evaluation. Human Relations 45(6), 601-620.
20. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: a test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16, 250-279.
21. Hall, D. T. (1971). A theoretical model of career subidentity development in organizational settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6, 50-76.
22. Hall, D. T. (2002). Careers In and Out of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
23. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Understanding Teacher Development. Teachers College.
24. Heneman, H. G. III, & Milanoswki, A. T. (2003). Continuing assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 17(2), 173-195.
25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal (5(1), 1-55.
26. Ingvarson, L., & Chadbourne, R. (1997). Reforming teachers' pay systems: The advanced skill teacher in Australia. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11(1), 7-30.
27. Jackson, S. E., & Shuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 36, 16-78.
28. Jackson, S. E., Schwab, R. L., & Shuler, R. S. (1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 630-640.
29. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
30. Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems. Journal of Personnel Evaluation 16(4), 241-268.
31. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford.
32. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods 7(1), 64-82.
33. Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman, H. G. III (2001). Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based evaluation system: a pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15(3), 193-212.
34. Moir, E., Freeman, S., Petrock, L., & Brown, W. (1997). A Developmental Continuum of Teacher Ability. University of California, Santa Cruz: Santa Cruz New Teacher Project.
35. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic.
36. Newcomb, M. D. (1994). Drug use and intimate relationships among women and men: separating specific from general effects in prospective data using structural equation models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62, 463-476.
37. Ogawa, R., Crowson, R., & Goldring, E. (1999). Enduring dilemmas of school organization. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (2nd edn., pp. 277-294). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
38. Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E. III, & Hackman, J. R. (1975). Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and role ambiguity in complex organizations. Adminintration Science Quarterly 15, 150-163.
40. Stinglhamber, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24, 251-270.
41. Taylor, P. J., & Pierce, J. L. (1999). Effects of introducing a performance management system on employees' subsequent attitudes and effort. Public Personnel Management 2, 423-452.
42. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, California: Sage.