Assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Technique, surgical correlation and patient outcome

European Radiology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 23-29

  Spencer, J A ^a   Ward, J ^a   Guthrie, J A ^a   Guillou, P J ^a   Robinson, Ph J A ^a  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contrast media; MRI; Pancreatic cancer

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULARIZATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031606822     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003300050331     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Connolly MM, Dawson PJ, Michelassi F et al. (1987) Survival in 1001 patients with carcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 206: 366-373
2. Tsuchiya R, Noda T, Harada M et al. (1986) Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Ann Surg 203: 77-81
3. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ et al. (1993) One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217: 430-438
4. Fernandez-del Castillo, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL (1995) Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 130: 295-300
5. Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MR (1996 a) Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 223: 273-279
6. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Traverso LAV (1988) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 166: 125-133
7. Freeny PC, Traverso LAV, Ryan JA (1993) Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with dynamic computed tomography. Am J Surg 166: 125-133
8. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH et al. (1995) Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 197: 381-385
9. Vellet AD, Romano W, Bach DB et al. (1992) Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic ducts: comparison evaluation with CT and MR imaging at 1.5T. Radiology 183: 87-95
10. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam HD et al. (1995) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of rcsectability: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 195: 327-332
11. Ward J, Martinez D, Chalmers AG, Ridgway J, Robinson PJ, Smith MA (1993) Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and portal vein. Br J Radiol 66: 214-222
12. Rodgers PM, Ward J, Baudouin CJ, Ridgway J, Robinson PJ (1994) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the portal venous system: comparison with X-ray angiography. Radiology 191: 741-745
13. Ward J, Spencer JA, Guthrie JA, Robinson PJ (1996) Liver transplantation: dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the hepatic vasculature. Clin Radiol 51: 191-197
14. Semelka RC, Kroeker MA, Shoenut JP et al. (1991) Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP and 1.5T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 181: 785-791
15. McFarland EG, Kaufman JA, Saini S et al. (1996) Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion. AJR 166: 37-43
16. Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Molina PL, Sharp T, Calvo B (1996) Pancreatic masses with inconclusive findings on spiral CT: Is there a role for MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 6: 585-588
17. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Kroeker MA et al. (1992) Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat suppressed, FLASH and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5T. Radiology 184: 687-694
18. Ward J, Baudouin CJ, Ridgway JP, Robinson PJ (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of focal liver lesions: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced TurboFLASH and T2-weighted spin echo images. Br J Radiol 68: 463-470
19. Conlon KC, Dougherty E, Klimstra DS et al. (1996 b) The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy. Ann Surg 223: 134-140
20. Coley SC, Strickland NH, Walker et al. (1997). Spiral CT and the pre-operative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Clin Radiol 52: 24-30
21. Warshaw AL (1991) Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging early pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 161: 26-30
22. Balen FG, Little A, Smith AC et al. (1994) Biopsy of inoperable pancreatic tumors does not adversely influence patient survival time. Radiology 193: 753-755
23. Sironi S, Cobelli F de, Zerbi A et al. (1996). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment of vascular invasion with high-field MR imaging and a phased-array coil. AJR 167: 997-1001
24. Muller MF, Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Schaer R, Marincek B (1994) Pancreatic tumours: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT and MR imaging. Radiology 190: 745-751
25. Tio TL, Tytgat GNJ, Cikot RJLM et al. (1990). Ampullopancreatic carcinoma: pre-operative TNM classification with endosonography. Radiology 175: 455-461
26. Palazzo L, Roseau G, Gayet B et al. (1993). Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan. Endoscopy 25: 143-150
27. Yasuda K, Mukai H, Nakajima M et al. (1993). Staging of pancreatic carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 25: 151-155