Comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in detecting and staging small pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 429-433

  Irie, H ^a   Honda, H ^a   Kaneko, K ^a   Kuroiwa, T ^a   Yoshimitsu, K ^a   Masuda, K ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Pancreas, CT; Pancreas, MR; Pancreas, neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0030916410     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900226     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1988;166:125-133
2. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;197:381-385
3. Semelka RC, Kroeker MA, Shoenut JP, et al. Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5-T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 1991;181:785-791
4. Vellet AD, Romano W, Bach DB, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic ducts: comparative evaluation with CT and MR imaging at 1.5T. Radiology 1992;183:87-95
5. Mitchell DG, Shapiro M, Schuricht A, et al. Pancreatic disease: findings on state-of-the-art MR images. AJR 1992;159:533-538
6. Warshaw AL, Fernandez del Castillo C. Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1992;326:455-465
7. Cameron JL, Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, et al. Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 1991;161:120-124
8. Tsuchiya R, Noda T, Harada N, et al. Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Ann Surg 1986;203:77-81
9. Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Saponaro S, et al. Liver and pancreas: improved spin-echo T1 contrast by shorter echo time and fat suppression at 1.5 T. Radiology 1991;178:67-71
10. Low RN, Francis IR, Sigeti JS, et al. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging. Radiology 1993;186:803-811
11. Müller MF, Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, et al. Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopie US, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology 1994;190:745-751
12. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 1995;195:327-332
13. Semelka RC, Simm FC, Recht MP, et al. MR imaging of the pancreas at high field strength: comparison of six sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:966-971
14. Semelka RC, Ascher SM. MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiology 1993;188:593-602
15. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Radiology 1994;193:683-688
16. Gambill EE. Pancreatitis associated with pancreatic carcinoma: a study of 26 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1971;46:174-177