The collaborative nature of pair programming

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4044 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 53-64

  Bryant, Sallyann ^a   Romero, Pablo ^a   Du Boulay, Benedict ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COSTS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

COLLABORATIVE VERBALIZATION; COMMERCIAL PAIR PROGRAMMERS; PAIR PROGRAMMING;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 33746198264     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11774129_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Williams, L. et al., Strengthening the case for pair programming, IEEE software, 2000. 17(4): p 19-25.
2. Jensen, R, A pair programming experience. The journal of defensive software engineering, 2003. 16(3): p.22-24.
3. Nosek, J.T, The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM, 1998. 41(3): p. 105-108.
4. Cockburn, A. and Williams, L, The costs and benefits of pair programming, in Extreme Programming Examined, G. Succi and M. Marchesi (Eds). 2001, Addison Wesley.
5. Tessem, B., Experiences in learning XP practices: A qualitative study. In Fourth International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 2003.
6. Lui, K. and K. Chan. When does a pair outperform two individuals? In Fourth International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 2003.
7. Williams, L. and R. Kessler, Pair Programming Illuminated. 2003, Boston: Addison Wesley.
8. Sharp, H. and H. Robinson. An ethnography of XP practices. In Fifteenth annual psychology of programming interest group workshop, 2003.
9. Bryant, S., P. Romero and B. du-Boulay, Pair programming and the re-appropriation of individual tools for collaborative software development, In press.
10. Chi, M., N. de Leeuw, M. Chiu and C. Lavancher, Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 1994. 18:p439-477.
11. Hutchins, E., Cognition in the wild. 1995, Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
12. Ainworth, S. and A. T. Loizou, The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 2003. 27: p.669-681.
13. Ericsson, K. and H. Simon, Verbal reports as data. Psychological review, 1980. 87(3): p.215-251.
14. Cox, R., Representation construction, externalized cognition and individual differences. Learning and instruction, 1999. 9: p.343-363.
15. Ericcson, K. and P. Poison, A cognitive analysis of exceptional memory for restaurant orders, in The nature of Expertise, M. Chi, R. Glaser and M. Farr (eds). 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, USA.
16. Schooler, J.A., S. Ohlsson and K. Brooks, Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 1993. 122(2): p 166-183.
17. Suthers, D. Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2001. 7(3).
18. Jeong, H. and M. Chi. Does collaborative learning lead to the construction of common knowledge? Twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society. 2000: Erlbaum, Hillsdale, USA.
19. Dillenbourg, P., What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approachs, D. Dillenbourg, Editor. 1999. Elsevier: London, UK. P1-9.
20. Roschelle, J. and S. D. Teasley, The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving, in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, C. E. O'Malley, Editor. 1995. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg. O, 69-97.
21. Curtis, B., By the way, did anyone study any real programmers? Empirical studies of programmers, E. Soloway and S. lyengar (eds). 1986. P.256-261.
22. Bryant, S. Double Trouble: Mixing quantitative and qualitative methods in the study of extreme programmers. Visual languages and human centric computing. 2004. IEEE Computer Society.
23. Bryant, S., Romero, P. and du-Boulay, B, Pair Programming and the re-appropriation of individual tools for collaborative software development (in press).
24. Chi, M., Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The journal of the learning sciences, 1997. 6(3): p.271-315.
25. Dick, A. and B. Zarnett. Paired programming and personality traits in Third International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 2002.
26. Hughes, J. and Parkes, S., Trends in the use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research. Behaviour and Information Technology, 2003, 22(2): p127-140.
27. Pennington, N., Stimulus Structures and Mental Representations in Expert Comprehension of Computer Programs, Cognitive Psychology. 1987, 19: p295-341.
28. Beck, K., Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2000. Addison Wesley.
29. th International conference in XP and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 2003. Goos, G., Hartmanis, J. and van Leeuwen, J. (eds): p325-327.