Cohesion and learning in a tutorial spoken dialog system

FLAIRS 2006 - Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 533-538

  Ward, Arthur ^a   Litman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

COHESION; COHESIVENESS; PRETEST SCORES; TUTORIAL SPOKEN DIALOG SYSTEM;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746048435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Barzilay, K., and Elhadad, M. 1097. Using lexical chains for text summarization. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop (ISTS'97), ACL, Madrid, Spain., 10-17.
2. Bloom, B. 1984, The 2 sigma problem; The search for melhods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13:4-16.
3. Chi, M.; Siler, S.; Jeong, H.; Yamauchi, T.; and Hausman, R. 2001. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science 25:471-533.
4. Forbes-Riley, K.; Litman, D.; Huettner. A.: and Ward. A. 2005. Dialogue-learning correlations in spoken dialogue tutoring. In Proceedings 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Education (AlED),Amsterdam, Netherlands.
5. Graesser, A.; Person, N.; and Magliano, J. 1995. Collaborative dialog patterns in naturalistic one-on-onc tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9:359-387,
6. Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English, English Language Series. Pearson Education Limited.
7. Hearst, M. 1994. Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text. In 32nd. Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 9-16.
8. Lilman, D., and Silliman, S. 2004. ITSPOKE: An intelligent tutoring spoken dialogue system. In Companion Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conf: 4th Meeting of the North American Chap. of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics.
9. Litman, D. J.; Rosé, C. P.: Forbes-Riley. K.; VanLehn, K.: Bhembe, D.: and Silliman. S. 2004. Spoken versus typed human and computer dialogue tutoring. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems(ITS). Maceio. Brazil.
10. McNamara, D. S., and Kintsch. W. 1996. Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes 22:247-287.
11. Morris. J., and Hirst, G. 1991. Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics 17(1):21-48.
12. Olney. A., and Cai. Z. 2005. An onhnnormal basis for topic segmentation in tutorial dialog. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP). 971-978. Vancouver.
13. Porter, M. F. 1997. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Readings in information retrieval 313-316.
14. vanDijk. T. A., and Kintsch. W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York. Academic Press.
15. VanLehn. K.; Jordan. P. W.; Rose. C. P.: Bhembe. D.: Boettner. M.: Gaydos. A.: Makatchev. M.: Pappuswamy. U.; Ringenberg. M.: Roque. A.; Siler. S.: and Srivastava. R. 2002. The architecture of why2-atlas: A coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, volume 2363 of LNCS, 158-167. Springer.
16. Ward. A., and Litman. D. 2005. Predicting learning in tutoring with the landscape model of memory. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Building Educational Applications using NLP, 21 -24.