Companion cognitive systems: A step toward human-level AI

AI Magazine

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 83-95

  Forbus, Kenneth D ^a,b   Hinrichs, Thomas R ^b  

^a Department of Computer Science ^*  (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATOR; DISTRIBUTED AGENT ARCHITECTURE; ROBUST REASONING AND LEARNING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745912985     PISSN: 07384602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen, J.; Ferguson, G.; and Stent, A. 2001. An Architecture for More Realistic Conversational Systems. In Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
2. Anderson, J.; and Lebiere, C. 1998. The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Canas A. J.; Ford, K. M.; Brennan, J.; Reichherzer, T.; Hayes, P. 1995. Knowledge Construction and Sharing in Quorum. World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 218-225. Brighton, UK: International AIED Society.
4. Chi, M. T. H.; Feltovich, P. J.; and Glaser, R, 1981. Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science 5(1): 121-152.
5. Cox, M. T. 2005. Metacognition in Computation. Artificial Intelligence 169(2): 104-141.
6. Eliasmith, C.; and Thagard, P. 2001. Integrating Structure and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Connectionist Mapping. Cognitive Science 25(2): 245-286.
7. Erol, K.; Nau, D.; and Hendler, J. 1994. UMCP: A Sound and Complete Planning Procedure for Hierarchical Task-Network Planning. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
8. Falkenhainer, B.; and Forbus, K. 1991. Compositional Modeling: Finding the Right Model for the Job. Artificial Intelligence 51(1-3): 95-143.
9. Falkenhainer, B.; Forbus, K.; and Gentner, D. 1989. The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples. Artificial Intelligence 41(1): 1-63.
10. Finlayson, M.; and Winston, P. 2004. A Model of Analogical Retrieval Using Intermediate Futures. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Wheat Ridge, CO: Cognitive Science Society.
11. Forbus, K. 1984. Qualitative Process. Theory Artificial Intelligence 24(1-3): 85-168.
12. Forbus, K.; Carney, K.; Sherin, B.; and Ureel, L. 2004. VModel: A Visual Qualitative Modeling Environment for Middle-SchoolStudents. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
13. Forbus, K.; Ferguson, R.; and Gentner, D. 1994. Incremental Structure-Mapping. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting or the Cognitive Science Society. Wheat Ridge, CO: Cognitive Science Society.
14. Forbus, K.; and Gentner, D. 1997. Qualitative Mental Models: Simulations or Memories? Paper presented at the Eleventh International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Cortona, Siena, Italy, June 1997.
15. Forbus, K.; Gentner, D.; and Law, K. 1995. MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval. Cognitive Science 19(2)(April-June): 141-205
16. Forbus, K. D.; and Kuehne, S. E. 1998. RoboTA: An Agent Colony Architecture for Supporting Education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 455-456. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
17. Forbus, K.; Mostek, T.; and Ferguson, R. 2002. An Analogy Ontology for Integrating Analogical Processing and First-Principles Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
18. Forbus, K.; and Usher, J. 2002. Sketching for Knowledge Capture: A Progress Report. In Proceedings of the Intelligent User Interfaces Conference. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
19. Forbus, K.; Usher, J.; and Chapman, V. 2003. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Sketch Maps. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
20. Forbus, K.; Usher, J.; and Tomai, E. 2005. Analogical Learning of Visual/ Conceptual Relationships in Sketches. In Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
21. French, R. 1995. The Subtlety of Similarity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2): 155-170.
23. Gentner, D.; and Markman, A. 1997. Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity. American Psychologist 52(1): 45-56
24. Horvitz, E.; Kadie, C. M.; Paek, T.; and Hovel, D. 2003. Models of Attention in Computing and Communication: From Principles to Applications. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery (CACM) 46(3): 52-59.
25. Houk, P. 2004. A Strategic Game Playing Agent for FreeCiv. Technical Report NWU-CS-04-29, Northwestern University, Computer Science Department. Evanston, IL.
26. Hummel, J. E.; and Holyoak, K. J. 1997. Distributed Representations of Structure: A Theory of Analogical Access and Mapping. Psychological Review 104(3): 427-466.
27. Kim, H. 1993. Qualitative Reasoning about Fluids and mechanics. Ph.D. dissertation and ILS Technical Report, Northwestern University, Computer Science Department. Evanston, IL.
28. Klenk, K.; Forbus, K.; Tomai, E.; Kim, H.; and Kyckelhahn, B. 2005. Solving Everyday Physical Reasoning Problems by Analogy Using Sketches. In Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
29. Kolodner, J. L. 1994. Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
30. Kuehne, S.; Forbus, K.; and Gentner, D. 2000. SEQL: Category Learning as Incremental Abstraction Using Structure Mapping. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Wheat Ridge, CO: Cognitive Science Society.
31. Kuehne, S.; Gentner, D.; and Forbus, K. 2000. Modeling Infant Learning Via Symbolic Structural Alignment. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Wheat Ridge, CO: Cognitive Science Society.
32. Kuipers, B. 1994. Qualitative Reasoning: Modeling and Simulation with Incomplete Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
33. Labrou, Y.; and Finin, T. 1997. A Proposal for a New KQML Specification. Technical Report TR CS-97-03, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD.
34. Laird, J.; Newell, A.; and Rosenbloom, P. 1987. SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 33(1): 1-64.
35. Larkey, L.; and Love, B. 2003. CAB: Connectionist Analogy Builder. Cognitive Science 27(5): 781-794.
36. Leake, D. 1996. Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
37. McDermott, D. 2001. Mind and Mechanism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38. Mitchell, M. 1993. Analogy-Making as Perception: A Computer Model. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39. Mostek, T.; Forbus, K.; and Meverden, C. 2000. Dynamic Case Creation and Expansion for Analogical Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
40. Nielsen, P. E. 1988. A Qualitative Approach to Rigid Body Mechanics. Tech. Rep. No. UIUCDCS-R-88-1469; UILU-ENG-88-1775. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Computer Science, Urbana, IL.
41. Novak, J. D.; and Gowin, D. B. 1984. Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Pool, M.; Russ, T.; Schneider, D.; Murray, K.; Fitzgerald, J.; Mehrota, M.; Schrag, R.; Blythe, J.; Kim, J.; Chalupsky, H.; and Miraglia, P. 2003. Evaluating Expert-Authored Rules for Military Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Capture. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
43. Rasch, R.; Kott, A.; and Forbus, K. 2002. AI on the Battlefield: An Experimental Exploration. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
44. Schmitt, J. F. 1994. Mastering Tactics: A Tactical Decision Game Workbook. Quantico, VA: Marine Corps Association.
45. Thomere, J.; Rodriguez, A.; Chaudhri, V.; Mishra, S.; Eriksen, M.; Clark, P.; Barker, K.; and Porter, B. 2002. A Web-Based Ontology Browsing and Editing System. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
46. VanLehn, K.; and Jones, R. 1993. Better Learners Use Analogical Problem Solving Sparingly. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 338-345. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
47. Veloso, M.; and Carbonell, J. 1993. Derivational Analogy in PRODIGY: Automating Case Acquisition, Storage, and Utilization. Machine Learning 10: 249-278.
48. Weld, D. 1990. Theories of Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
49. Winston, P. 1981. Learning New Principles from Precedents and Exercises: The Details. MIT AI Laboratory Memo #632, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
50. Yan, J.; Forbus, K.; and Gentner, D. 2003. A Theory of Rerepresentation in Analogical Matching. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Wheat Ridge, CO: Cognitive Science Society.