CAB: Connectionist Analogy Builder

Cognitive Science

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 781-794

  Larkey, Levi B ^a   Love, Bradley C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Analogy; Artificial Intelligence; Cognitive modeling; Connectionism; Knowledge representation; Psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141867608     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00066-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Falkenhainer B. Forbus K.D. Gentner D. The structure mapping engine: Algorithm and examples Artificial Intelligence 41 1989 1-63
2. Forbus, K. D., & Oblinger, D. (1990). Making SME greedy and pragmatic. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 61-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Gentner D. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy Cognitive Science 7 1983 155-170
4. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical processing (pp. 199-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Gentner D. Toupin C. Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analog Cognitive Science 10 1986 277-300
6. Gentner D. Ratterman M. Forbus K. The role of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness Cognitive Psychology 25 1993 524-575
7. Goldstone R.L. Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 20 1994 3-28
8. Goldstone, R. L., & Rogosky, B. J. (2002). Using relations within conceptual systems to translate across conceptual systems. Cognition, 84, 295-320.
9. Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2001). Toward an understanding of analogy within a biological symbol system. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 161-195). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Holyoak K.J. Thagard P. Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction Cognitive Science 13 1989 295-355
11. Hummel J.E. Holyoak K.J. Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping Psychological Review 104 1997 427-466
12. James, W. (1985). Psychology: The briefer course. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
13. Keane M.T. What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure on analogical mapping Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 23 1997 946-967
14. Keane, M. T., & Brayshaw, M. (1988). The incremental analogy machine: A computational model of analogy. In Third European Working Session on Machine Learning (pp. 53-62). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
15. Love B.C. Rouder J. Wisniewski E.J. A structural account of global and local processing Cognitive Psychology 38 1999 291-316
16. Markman A.B. Constraints on analogical inference Cognitive Science 21 1997 373-418
17. Markman A.B. Gentner D. Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity Journal of Memory and Language 32 1993a 517-535
18. Markman A.B. Gentner D. Structural alignment during similarity comparisons Cognitive Psychology 23 1993b 431-467
19. Markman A.B. Gentner D. Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons Memory and Cognition 24 1996 235-249
20. Markman A.B. Gentner D. The effects of alignability on memory Psychological Science 8 1997 363-367
21. Markman A.B. Gentner D. Structure mapping in the comparison process American Journal of Psychology 113 2000 501-538
22. Marks L.E. On cross-modal similarity: The perceptual structure in pitch, loudness, and brightness Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 1989 586-602
23. Minsky, M. (1981). A framework for representing knowledge. In J. Haugland (Ed.), Mind design (pp. 95-128). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Murphy G.L. Allopenna P.D. The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 20 1994 904-919
25. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similairty, and the identification-categorization relationship Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 1986 39-57
26. Rumelhart D.E. Abrahamson A.A. A model for analogical reasoning Cognitive Psychology 5 1973 1-28
27. Rumelhart D.E. Hinton G.E. Williams R.J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors Nature 323 1986 533-536
28. Shepard R.N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part 1 Psychometrika 1 1962 125-140
29. Shepard R.N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science Science 237 1987 1317-1323
30. Spellman B.A. Holyoak K.J. If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 1992 913-933
31. Stilwell, C. H., & Markman, A. B. (2001). The fate of irrelevant information in analogical mapping. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 988-993). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Tversky A. Features of similarity Psychological Review 84 1977 327-352