Analogical learning of visual/conceptual relationships in sketches

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 202-208

  Forbus, Kenneth D ^a   Usher, Jeffrey ^a   Tomai, Emmett ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COGNITIVE SIMULATIONS; CONCEPTUAL RELATIONSHIPS; SKETCHES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 29344437833     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Alvarado, Christine and Davis, Randall (2001). Resolving ambiguities to create a natural sketch based interface. Proceedings of IJCAI-2001.
2. Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., Chen, L., and Clow, J. (1997). QuickSet: Multimodal interaction for distributed applications, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Multimodal Conference (Multimedia '97), Seattle, WA, November 1997), ACM Press, pp 31-40.
3. Cohn, A.G. 1996 Calculi for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning. In Calmet, J., Campbell, J.A., and Pfalzgraph, J. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Symbolic Mathematical Computation. LNCS 1138. Springer Verlag, 124-143.
4. Davies, J., & Goel, A. K. (2001). Visual analogy in problem solving. Proceedings of IJCAI 2001. pp 377-382. Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Davies, J. and Goel, A. 2003. Representation issues in visual analogy. Proceedings of CogSci03.
6. Eliasmith, C. and Thagard, P. 2001. Integrating structure and meaning: A distributed model of connectionist mapping. Cognitive Science.
7. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. and Gentner, D. The Structure-Mapping Engine. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1986.
8. Ferguson, R. W. (1994). MAGI: Analogy-based encoding using symmetry and regularity, Proceedings of CogSci94.
9. Ferguson, R. and Forbus, K. (2000). GeoRep: A flexible tool for spatial representation of line drawings. Proceedings of AAAI-2000. Austin, Texas.
10. Forbus, K. D. (1984). Qualitative Process Theory. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 85-168.
11. Forbus, K. 2001. Exploring analogy in the large. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K., and Kokinov, B. (Eds.) Analogy: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
12. Forbus, K. and Gentner, D. 1997. Qualitative mental models: Simulations or memories? Proceedings of the Eleventh International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Cortona, Italy.
13. Forbus, K., Ferguson, R. and Gentner, D. 1994. Incremental structure-mapping. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, August.
14. Forbus, K., Gentner, D., and Law, K. MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205, 1994.
15. Forbus, K. and Hinrichs, T. 2004. Companion Cognitive Systems: A step towards human-level AI. AAAI Fall Symposium on Achieving Human-level Intelligence through Integrated Systems and Research, October, Washington, DC.
16. Forbus, K., Mostek, T. and Ferguson, R. 2002. An analogy ontology for integrating analogical processing and first-principles reasoning. Proceedings of IAAI-02, July.
17. Forbus, K. and Usher, J. 2002. Sketching for knowledge capture: A progress report. IUI'02, San Francisco, CA.
18. Forbus, K. Usher, J. and Chapman, V. 2003. Qualitative spatial reasoning about sketch maps. Proceedings of IAAI03, Acapulco, Mexico
19. French, R. (1995). The subtlety of similarity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Gentner, D., Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science 7(2), 1983
21. Hummel, J.E., & Holyoak, K.J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104.
22. Kim, H. 1993. Qualitative reasoning about fluids and mechanics. Ph.D. dissertation and ILS Technical Report, Northwestern University.
23. Klenk, M., Forbus, K., Tomai, E., Kim, H., and Kyckelhahn, B. 2005. Solving Everyday Physical Reasoning Problems by Analogy. Proceedings of AAAI05.
24. Kolodner, J. L. 1994. Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
25. Kuehne, S., Forbus, K., and Gentner, D. 2000. SEQL: Category learning as incremental abstraction using structure mapping. Proceedings of CogSci-2000. Philadelphia, PA.
26. Larkey, L. and Love, B. 2003. CAB: Connectionist Analogy Builder. Cognitive Science, 27:781-794.
27. Leake, D. (Ed.) 1996. Case-based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons and Future Directions, MIT Press.
28. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. 2000. Structure-mapping in the comparison process. American Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 501-538.
29. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. 2000. Structure-mapping in the comparison process. American Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 501-538.
30. Markman, A.B., & Makin, V.S. 1998. Referential communication and category acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 331-354.
31. Mitchell, M. (1993) Analogy-making as perception: A computer model. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Mostek, T., Forbus, K. and Meverden, C. 2000. Dynamic case creation and expansion for analogical reasoning. Proceedings of AAAI-2000. Austin, Texas.
33. Nielsen, P. 1988. A Qualitative Approach to Rigid Body Mechanics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
34. Yan, J., Forbus, K. and Gentner, D. 2003. A theory of rerepresentation in analogical matching. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society