Strong field behavior of the NMR signal from magnetically heterogeneous tissues

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 226-236

  Jensen, J H ^a,b   Chandra, R ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone marrow; Brain; Contrast agents; Diffusion; Susceptibility effects

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; DIFFUSION; HISTOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; SPIN POLARIZATION; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); TISSUE;

BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; BONE MARROW; CONTRAST AGENT; EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD; HETEROGENEOUS TISSUES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE(NMR); PARTICLE SUSPENSIONS; RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED;

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CALCULATION; DIFFUSION; MAGNETIC FIELD; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0033972949     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200002)43:2<226::AID-MRM9>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility ot the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850.
2. Ford JC, Wehrli FW. In vivo quantitative characterization of trabecular bone by NMR interferometry and localized proton spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:543-551.
3. Wehrli FW, Ford JC, Attie M, Kressel HY, Kaplan FS. Trabecular structure: preliminary application of MR interferometry. Radiology 1991;179:615-621.
4. Majumdar S, Thomasson D, Shimakawa A, Genant HK. Quantitation of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: experimental studies. Magn Reson Med 1991;22:111-127.
5. 2 anisotropic effects on magnetic resonance bone mineral density measurement. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:214-221.
6. Song HK, Wehrli FW, Ma J. Field strength and angle dependence of trabecular bone marrow transverse relaxation in the calcaneus. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:382-388.
7. Brooks RA, Di Chiro G. Magnetic resonance imaging of stationary blood: a review. Med Phys 1987;14:903-913.
8. Sorensen AG, Tievsky AL, Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR. Contrast agents in functional MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:47-55.
9. Kennan RP, Zhong J, Gore JC. Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissuos. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:9-21.
10. Ogawa S, Lee T, Nayak AS, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:68-78.
11. Hoppel BE, Weisskoff RM, Thulborn KR, Monre JB, Kwong KK, Rosen BR. Measurement of regional blond oxygenation and cerebral hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:715-723.
12. Boxerman JL, Hamburg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:555-566.
13. Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneons tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:749-763.
14. Kiselev VG, Posse S. Analytical theory of susceptibility induced NMR signal dephasing in a cerebrovascular network. Phys Rev Lett 1998;81: 5696-5699.
15. Kiselev VG, Posse S. Analytical model of susceptibility-induced MR signal dephasing: effect of diffusion in a microvascular network. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:499-509.
16. Muller RN, Gillis P, Moiny F, Roch A. Transverse relaxivity of particulate MRI contrast media: from theories to experiments. Magn Reson Med 1991;22:178-182.
17. Weisskoff RM, Zuo CS, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:601-610.
18. Dickinson WC. The time average magnetic field at the nucleus in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1951;81:717-731.
19. Torrey HC. Bloch equations with diffusion terms. Phys Rev 1956;104: 563-565.
20. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Chap. 7. New York: Cambridge University Press: 1989.
21. Pawlik G, Rackl A, Bing RJ. Quantitative capillary topography and blood flow in the cerebral cortex of cats: an in vivo microscopic study. Brain Res 1981;208:35-58.
22. Le Bihan D, Turner R, Patronas N. Diffusion MR imaging in normal brain and in brain tumors. In: Le Bihan D, editor. Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: applications to functional MRI. New York: Raven Press; 1995. p 134-140.
23. Dennie J, Mandeville JB, Boxerman JL, Packard SD, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. NMR imaging of changes in vascular morphology due to tumor angiogenesis. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:793-799.
24. Gibson LJ. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech 1985;18:317-328.
25. Ponder E. Hemolysis and related phenomena. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1948.
26. 2 relaxation and diffusion in the presence of gadolinium. Magn Reson Med 1998;39: 223-233.
27. Gasparovic G, Matwiyoff NA. The magnetic properties and water dynamics of the red blood cell: a study by proton-NMR lineshape analysis. Magn Reson Med 1992;26:274-299.
28. Stables LA, Kennan RP, Gore JC. Asymmetric spin echo imaging of magnetically inhomogeneous systems: theory, experiment, and numerical studies. Magn Res Med 1998;40:432-442.